2. Ministry of Health & Welfare. Advanced analysis of Korean national oral health survey. 2011. p. 320–349.
3. Yadav B, Jayna M, Yadav H, Suri S, Phogat S, Madan R. Comparison of different final impression techniques for management of resorbed mandibular ridge: a case report. Case Rep Dent. 2014; 2014:253731.
Article
4. McCord JF, Tyson KW. A conservative prosthodontic option for the treatment of edentulous patients with atrophic (flat) mandibular ridges. Br Dent J. 1997; 182:469–472.
Article
5. Tunkiwala A, Ram S. Management of mandibular poor foundation: conventional complete dentures. Dent Pract. 2013; 11:34–37.
6. Makzoumé JE. Morphologic comparison of two neutral zone impression techniques: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:563–568.
Article
7. Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 36:356–367.
Article
8. Sanghvi SJ, Bhatt NA, Bhargava K. An evaluation of crossbite ridge relationships. A study of articulated jaw records of 150 edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45:24–29.
Article
9. Kapur KK, Soman S. The effect of denture factors on masticatory performance part III. The location of food platforms. 1965. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:265–273.
10. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Ergin S, Erdogan O, Ates G. Evaluation of satisfaction and complications in patients with existing complete dentures. J Oral Sci. 2013; 55:29–37.
Article
11. Wehner PJ, Hickey JC, Boucher CO. Selection of artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 18:222–232.
Article
12. Yoshida K, Okane H, Nagasawa T, Tsuru H. A criterion for the selection of artificial posterior teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1988; 15:373–378.
Article
13. McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH. Classification system for complete edentulism. Dent Today. 2001; 20:90–95.
Article