Ann Lab Med.  2019 May;39(3):333-339. 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.333.

Comparison of Method Group Precision in Proficiency Testing of Clinical Chemistry Tests Before and After Two Major Changes: Reorganization of Proficiency Testing and Implementation of the Differential Benefit for the Quality of Laboratory Tests

• Park H
• Cho J

• KMID: 2431614
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.333

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Chemistry, Clinical*
Clinical Chemistry Tests*
Methods*

Reference

1. Lee YW, Jeon BR, Kim JG, Jun SH, Yun YM, Chun S, et al. Annual Report on the External Quality Assessment Scheme for Routine Clinical Chemistry in Korea (2016). J Lab Med Qual Assur. 2017; 39:61–75.

2. Ministry of Health and Welfare Notice 2017-111. Update on Jul 2017. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb0406vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=030406&CONT_SEQ=340352&page=1.

3. Proficiency Testing, Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory (Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service). Updated on Jul 2018. http://eqas.keqas.org.

4. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing;Updated on Sep 2018. https://www.R-project.org.

5. Jang MA, Yoon YA, Song J, Kim JH, Min WK, Lee JS, et al. Effect of accreditation on accuracy of diagnostic tests in medical laboratories. Ann Lab Med. 2017; 37:213–222. PMID: 28224767.

6. Yoon YA, Jang MA, Lee JS, Min WK, Kwon KC, Lee YW, et al. Effect of Accreditation on the accuracy of diagnostic hematologic tests: standard deviation index analysis. Ann Lab Med. 2018; 38:67–70. PMID: 29071823.