Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci.  2018 Nov;16(4):469-480. 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.4.469.

A Pharmacogenomic-based Antidepressant Treatment for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: Results from an 8-week, Randomized, Single-blinded Clinical Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. pae@catholic.ac.kr
  • 3International Health Care Center, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • 5Global Medical Education, New York, NY, USA.
  • 6Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Psychiatric Section, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • 7Cell Death Disease Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Pharmacogenomic-based antidepressant treatment (PGATx) may result in more precise pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder (MDD) with better drug therapy guidance.
METHODS
An 8-week, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of PGATx in 100 patients with MDD. All recruited patients were randomly allocated either to PGATx (n=52) or treatment as usual (TAU, n=48) groups. The primary endpoint was a change of total score of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAMD-17) from baseline to end of treatment. Response rate (at least 50% reduction in HAMD-17 score from baseline), remission rate (HAMD-17 score ≥7 at the end of treatment) as well as the change of total score of Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Ratings (FIBSER) from baseline to end of treatment were also investigated.
RESULTS
The mean change of HAMD-17 score was significantly different between two groups favoring PGATx by −4.1 point of difference (p=0.010) at the end of treatment. The mean change in the FIBSER score from baseline was significantly different between two treatment groups favoring PGATx by −2.5 point of difference (p=0.028). The response rate (71.7 % vs. 43.6%, p=0.014) were also significantly higher in PGATx than in TAU at the end of treatment, while the remission rate was numerically higher in PGATx than in TAU groups without statistical difference (45.5% vs. 25.6%, p=0.071). The reason for early drop-out associated with adverse events was also numerically higher in TAU (n=9, 50.0%) than in PGATx (n=4, 30.8%).
CONCLUSION
The present study clearly demonstrate that PGATx may be a better treatment option in the treatment of MDD in terms of effectiveness and tolerability; however, study shortcomings may limit a generalization. Adequately-powered, well-designed, subsequent studies should be mandatory to prove its practicability and clinical utility for routine practice.

Keyword

Depressive disorder; Pharmacogenetic testing; Antidepressants; Precision medicine; Effects; Tolerance

MeSH Terms

Antidepressive Agents
Depression
Depressive Disorder
Depressive Disorder, Major*
Drug Therapy
Generalization (Psychology)
Humans
Precision Medicine
Antidepressive Agents
Full Text Links
  • CPN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr