Asian Spine J.  2018 Oct;12(5):839-845. 10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.839.

Use of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for the Measurement of Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass/Whole Fat Mass and Its Relevance in Assessing Osteoporosis among Patients with Low Back Pain: A Comparative Analysis Using Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chibaken Saiseikai Narashino Hospital, Narashino, Japan. s9082@nms.ac.jp
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Shimoshizu Hospital, Yotsukaido, Japan.
  • 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.
  • 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sainou Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
  • 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
  • 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
  • 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba Qiball Clinic, Chiba, Japan.
  • 10Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kitachiba Spine & Sports Clinic, Chiba, Japan.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PURPOSE: To compare measurements of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) and whole fat mass (WFM) obtained using dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) among patients with low back pain (LBP). Moreover, the study investigated the correlation between BIA-based ASMM and DXA-based bone mineral density (BMD). OVERVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: If reliable, BIA may be a useful alternative to DXA as a screening tool for sarcopenia and osteoporosis among patients with LBP.
METHODS
Measurements were performed in 130 patients, including BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The correlation between DXA and BIA as well as between BIA-ASMM and BMD were evaluated.
RESULTS
BIA and DXA were highly correlated in both male and female patients (r =0.73-0.90, p < 0.0001). However, BIA consistently overestimated ASMM by 1.5-2.5 kg on an average (p < 0.0001) and underestimated WFM (−4.0 to −2.7 kg) on an average (p < 0.0001). BIA-based ASMM correlated with BMD of the lumbar spine in both male and female patients (r =0.28-0.37, p ≤0.02) and that of the femoral neck (r =0.34-0.51, p ≤0.005). Regarding the calculated skeletal muscle index (SMI: ASMM/height [m2]) used as a criterion for sarcopenia, BIA-based SMI correlated with BMD of the lumbar spine in male patients (r =0.44, p =0.0004) and that of the femoral neck in female patients (r =0.33, p =0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
BIA may be a favorable alternative to DXA as a screening tool for sarcopenia and osteoporosis among patients with LBP. Considering the overestimation of BIA-based ASMM and SMI, we recommend using the cutoff values for sarcopenia of 7.9 kg/m2 for males and 6.1 kg/m2 for females.

Keyword

Lumbar vertebrae; Low back pain; Skeletal muscle; Sarcopenia; Osteoporosis

MeSH Terms

Absorptiometry, Photon*
Bone Density
Electric Impedance*
Female
Femur Neck
Humans
Low Back Pain*
Lumbar Vertebrae
Male
Mass Screening
Muscle, Skeletal*
Observational Study
Osteoporosis*
Sarcopenia
Spine
Full Text Links
  • ASJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr