Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2018 Aug;22(3):261-268. 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.3.261.

Vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric venous axis is beneficial despite a high rate of R1 resection

Affiliations
  • 1Gleneagles Global Hospital and Health City, Chennai, India. cramkay@gmail.com
  • 2Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
En-bloc vein resection (VR) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the head of pancreas adherent to the portomesenteric axis benefits patients when the vein wall is not infiltrated by tumour and an R0 resection is achieved, albeit at the expense of greater morbidity and mortality.
METHODS
A retrospective review of pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC over 6 years was conducted. Patients were divided into a standard resection group (Group SR) and simultaneous vein resection group (Group VR) and compared for outcome.
RESULTS
The study group consisted of 41 patients (Group SR 15, Group VR 26). VR was performed by end-to-end reconstruction in 12 patients and with interposition grafts in 13 cases (autologous vein in 10, PTFE in 3). R1 resections occurred in 49% patients, with the superior mesenteric artery margin most commonly involved. Patients with Ishikawa grade III and IV vein involvement were more likely to carry a positive SMA margin (p=0.04). Involvement of the splenoportal junction was associated with a significantly greater risk of pancreatic transection margin involvement. No difference in morbidity was seen between the groups. Median survival in the entire group of patients was 17 months and did not vary significantly between the groups. The only significant predictor of survival was lymph node status.
CONCLUSIONS
Venous involvement by proximal PDAC is indicative of tumor location rather than tumor biology. VR improves outcomes in patients with tumor adhesion to the portomesenteric venous axis despite a high incidence of R1 resections and greater operative mortality.

Keyword

Pancreatic cancer; Vein involvement; Borderline resectable; Vein resection; Survival

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma*
Biology
Head*
Humans
Incidence
Lymph Nodes
Mesenteric Artery, Superior
Mortality
Pancreas*
Pancreatic Ducts
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Retrospective Studies
Transplants
Veins*
Polytetrafluoroethylene

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of patient survival between the standard resection (SR) group and vein resection (VR) group.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of patient survival according to lymph node involvement.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of patient survival according to histological vein wall involvement.

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of patient survival following R0 vs. R1 resection.

  • Fig. 5 Comparison of patient survival according to type of vascular reconstruction.


Reference

1. Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, Sun CC, Lee JE, Fleming JB, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206:833–846.
Article
2. Katz MH, Crane CH, Varadachary G. Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014; 24:105–112.
Article
3. Ravikumar R, Sabin C, Abu Hilal M, Bramhall S, White S, Wigmore S, et al. Portal Vein resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a United Kingdom multicentre study. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218:401–411.
4. Murakami Y, Satoi S, Motoi M, Sho M, Kawai M, Matsumoto I, et al. Portal or superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg. 2015; 102:837–846.
5. Delpero JR, Boher JM, Sauvanet A, Le Truet YP, Sa-Cunha A, Mabrut JY, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vein involvement: is up front synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection still justified? a survey of the association Francaise de Chirurgie. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:1874–1883.
6. Giovinazzo F, Turri G, Katz MH, Heaton N, Ahmed I. Meta-analysis of benefits of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2016; 103:179–191.
Article
7. Tol JA, Eshuis WJ, Besselink MG, van Gulik TM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. Non-radical resection versus bypass procedure for pancreatic cancer - a consecutive series and systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015; 41:220–227.
Article
8. Pan G, Xie KL, Wu H. Vascular resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma with portal or superior mesenteric vein invasion. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19:8740–8744.
Article
9. Barreto SG, Windsor JA. Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2016; [in press]. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00463-5.
Article
10. Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, Fishman EK, Hough DM, Lu DS, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association. Radiology. 2014; 270:248–260.
Article
11. Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, Furukawa H, Sasaki Y, Fujita M, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992; 215:231–236.
Article
12. Sanjay P, Takaori K, Govil S, Shrikhande SV, Windsor JA. Artery-first approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2012; 99:1027–1035.
Article
13. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005; 138:8–13.
Article
14. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007; 142:20–25.
15. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142:761–768.
Article
16. Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMohan MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A. Redefining the r1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:1232–1237.
Article
17. Fuhrman GM, Leach SD, Staley CA, Cusack JC, Charnsangavej C, Cleary KR, et al. Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. pancreatic tumour study group. Ann Surg. 1996; 223:154–162.
18. Kim PT, Wei AC, Atenafu EG, Cavallucci D, Cleary SP, Moulton CA, et al. Planned versus unplanned portal vein resections during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013; 100:1349–1356.
Article
19. Ethun CG, Kooby DA. The importance of surgical margins in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113:283–288.
Article
20. Van den Broeck A, Sergeant G, Ectors N, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, Topal B. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35:600–604.
Article
21. Verbeke CS. Resection margins in pancreatic cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2013; 93:647–662.
Article
22. Kimbrough CW, St Hill CR, Martin RC, Mcmasters KM, Scoggins CR. Tumor-positive resection margins reflect an aggressive tumor biology in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 107:602–607.
Article
23. Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, Friess H, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are r1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15:1651–1660.
Article
24. Mizuno S, Isaji S, Tanemura A, Kishiwada M, Murata Y, Azumi Y, et al. Anterior approach to the superior mesenteric artery by using nerve plexus hanging maneuver for borderline resectable pancreatic head carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18:1209–1215.
Article
25. Butler JR, Ahmad SA, Katz MH, Cioffi JL, Zyromski NJ. A systematic review of the role of periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery in affecting margin status after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2016; 18:305–311.
Article
26. Strasberg SM, Sanchez LA, Hawkins WG, Fields RC, Linehan DC. Resection of tumors of the neck of the pancreas with venous invasion: the “whipple at the splenic artery (WATSA)” procedure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16:1048–1054.
Article
27. Kooby DA, Lad NL, Squires MH, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Staley CA, et al. Value of intraoperative neck margin analysis during whipple for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 1399 patients. Ann Surg. 2014; 260:494–501. discussion 501-503.
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr