Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2018 Jan;61(1):48-55. 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.48.

Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. dittakarn.bor@mahidol.ac.th

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) in emergency cesarean delivery and associated factors.
METHODS
A total of 431 pregnant women who were indicated for emergency cesarean delivery were included. Clinical information and timing of process after decision until delivery and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
Mean age was 30 years, and 59.4% were nulliparous. Mean gestational age at delivery was 37.9 weeks. The decision was made during normal office hour in 33.2%. Median decision-to-operating room interval, decision-to-incision interval, and DDIs were 45, 70, and 82 minutes, respectively. Only 3.5% of patients had DDI ≤30 minutes, while 52.0% had DDI >75 minutes. During after office hours, every time interval was significantly shorter and 4.9% had DDI ≤30 minutes compared to 0.7% in normal office hours (P=0.001). Compared to other indications, time intervals were significantly shorter in those with non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR), and DDI ≤30 minutes was achieved in 18.8% vs. 0.8% (P < 0.001). Shortest DDI was observed among those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between different DDIs.
CONCLUSION
Only 3.5% of emergency cesarean delivery had a DDI ≤30 minutes (median 82 minutes). Significant shorter time intervals were observed in those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours.

Keyword

Decision making; Cesarean section; Emergencies

MeSH Terms

Cesarean Section
Decision Making
Emergencies*
Female
Gestational Age
Heart Rate, Fetal
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnant Women
Tertiary Healthcare*
Thailand*

Reference

1. American Academy of Pediatrics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics;2002.
2. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Report of a joint working group: organization standards for maternity services. London (GB): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Press;1995.
3. Schauberger CW, Chauhan SP. Emergency cesarean section and the 30-minute rule: definitions. Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26:221–226.
Article
4. Bruce D, Stone S, Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections--completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22:273–278.
Article
5. Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? BJOG. 2002; 109:505–508.
Article
6. Livermore LJ, Cochrane RM. Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1,000 emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 26:307–310.
Article
7. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Caesarean section: NICE clinical guideline 132. London (GB): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Press;2011.
8. Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 27:251–267.
Article
9. Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Gilbert S, Hauth JC, Landon MB, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108:6–11.
Article
10. Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ. 2001; 322:1330–1333.
Article
11. Bello FA, Tsele TA, Oluwasola TO. Decision-to-delivery intervals and perinatal outcomes following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 130:279–283.
Article
12. Chukwudi OE, Okonkwo CA. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution. Pak J Med Sci. 2014; 30:946–950.
Article
13. Onah HE, Ibeziako N, Umezulike AC, Effetie ER, Ogbuokiri CM. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 25:342–346.
14. Boriboonhirunsarn D, Watananirun K, Sompagdee N. Decision-to-delivery interval in pregnant women with intrapartum non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016; 22:998–1002.
Article
15. American Academy of Pediatrics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village (IL): American Academy of Pediatrics;2012.
16. Chauleur C, Collet F, Furtos C, Nourrissat A, Seffert P, Chauvin F. Identification of factors influencing the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009; 68:248–254.
Article
17. Sayegh I, Dupuis O, Clement HJ, Rudigoz RC. Evaluating the decision--to--delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004; 116:28–33.
Article
18. MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG. 2002; 109:498–504.
Article
19. Fuhrmann L, Pedersen TH, Atke A, Møller AM, Østergaard D. Multidisciplinary team training reduces the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015; 59:1287–1295.
Article
20. Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, Ben-Haroush A, Sadan O, Golan A, et al. The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210:224.e1–224.e6.
Article
21. Hillemanns P, Strauss A, Hasbargen U, Schulze A, Genzel-Boroviczeny O, Weninger E, et al. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005; 273:161–165.
22. Holcroft CJ, Graham EM, Penning DH. Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval and the 30-minute rule for emergency cesareans. J Perinatol. 2005; 25:616.
Article
23. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ. 2004; 328:665.
Article
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr