J Bone Metab.  2018 Aug;25(3):165-173. 10.11005/jbm.2018.25.3.165.

Dental Panoramic Radiographic Indices as a Predictor of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Saudi Women

Affiliations
  • 1Center of Excellence for Osteoporosis Research, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • 2Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • 3Department of Orthodontics and Maxillofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • 4Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • 5Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. ayman.elsamanoudy@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Many oral presentations of osteoporosis-a bone metabolic disease-were recorded. Thus, we aimed to assess panoramic radiomorphometric indices with bone mineral density (BMD) values among Saudi postmenopausal women and its importance in the prediction of osteoporosis.
METHODS
A total of 431 Saudi women were enrolled in this study. Panoramic radiographs were obtained at the time of BMD measurement. Subjects were fatherly classified into; normal BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]D) and intact-parathyroid hormone were measured. Moreover, serum creatinine, calcium, and phosphate, together with serum osteocalcin (s-OC), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (s-PINP) and cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (s-CTX) were measured. Receiver-operator curve (ROC) curve analysis for use of mandibular cortical width (MCW), panoramic mandibular index (PMI), and maxillary-mandibular ratio (M/M ratio) to differentiate women with osteoporosis or osteopenia from normal subjects was calculated. Cut off values of 4.6 at T score <−1 and 4.1 at T score ≤−2.5 were used.
RESULTS
Body mass index is significantly low in the osteoporotic group. There is no significant difference in serum levels of LH, E2, calcium, phosphate, and 25(OH)D between the studied groups. Moreover, s-OC, C-terminal propeptide of procollagen type I, s-PINP, s-CTX, and urinary-CTX are significantly higher in osteoporosis than normal and osteopenia groups. ROC curve analysis revealed that MCW and PMI showed significant data while M/M ratio is non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS
It could be concluded that MCW as an important panoramic radiographic parameter can be used for prediction and diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Saudi women with low BMD.

Keyword

Bone density; Osteoporosis; Postmenopause; Radiography, panoramic; Saudi Arabia

MeSH Terms

Body Mass Index
Bone Density
Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Calcium
Collagen Type I
Creatinine
Diagnosis
Estradiol
Female
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
Humans
Luteinizing Hormone
Osteocalcin
Osteoporosis*
Postmenopause
Radiography, Panoramic
ROC Curve
Saudi Arabia
Calcium
Collagen Type I
Creatinine
Estradiol
Follicle Stimulating Hormone
Luteinizing Hormone
Osteocalcin

Reference

1. Calciolari E, Donos N, Park JC, et al. Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2015; 94:17s–27s. PMID: 25365969.
2. Bhatnagar S, Krishnamurthy V, Pagare SS. Diagnostic efficacy of panoramic radiography in detection of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women with low bone mineral density. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013; 3:23. PMID: 23814695.
Article
3. Friedlander AH. The physiology, medical management and oral implications of menopause. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133:73–81. PMID: 11811747.
Article
4. Melton LJ 3rd. Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res. 2003; 18:1139–1141. PMID: 12817771.
Article
5. Dervis E. Oral implications of osteoporosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100:349–356. PMID: 16122665.
Article
6. WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994; 843:1–129. PMID: 7941614.
7. Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S. New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2006; 7:67–74. PMID: 17043763.
Article
8. Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, et al. Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners’ diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int. 2003; 14:659–664. PMID: 12827223.
9. Taguchi A. Triage screening for osteoporosis in dental clinics using panoramic radiographs. Oral Dis. 2010; 16:316–327. PMID: 19671082.
Article
10. Devlin H, Horner K. Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2002; 13:373–378. PMID: 12086347.
Article
11. Dutra V, Devlin H, Susin C, et al. Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102:663–668. PMID: 17052644.
Article
12. Savic Pavicin I, Dumancic J, Jukic T, et al. Digital orthopantomograms in osteoporosis detection: mandibular density and mandibular radiographic indices as skeletal BMD predictors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43:20130366. PMID: 24969554.
Article
13. Ardawi MS, Qari MH, Rouzi AA, et al. Vitamin D status in relation to obesity, bone mineral density, bone turnover markers and vitamin D receptor genotypes in healthy Saudi pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22:463–475. PMID: 20431993.
Article
14. Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kröger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994; 102:68–72. PMID: 8153584.
Article
15. Taguchi A, Tanimoto K, Suei Y, et al. Tooth loss and mandibular osteopenia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 79:127–132. PMID: 7614152.
Article
16. Ledgerton D, Horner K, Devlin H, et al. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a British female population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28:173–181. PMID: 10740473.
Article
17. Ardawi MS, Maimani AA, Bahksh TA, et al. Reference intervals of biochemical bone turnover markers for Saudi Arabian women: a cross-sectional study. Bone. 2010; 47:804–814. PMID: 20659600.
Article
18. Cvijetić S, Grazio S, Kastelan D, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2007; 58:13–18. PMID: 17424780.
Article
19. López-López J, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jane-Salas E, et al. Early diagnosis of osteoporosis by means of orthopantomograms and oral x-rays: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16:e905–e913. PMID: 21743400.
20. Dagistan S, Bilge OM. Comparison of antegonial index, mental index, panoramic mandibular index and mandibular cortical index values in the panoramic radiographs of normal males and male patients with osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:290–294. PMID: 20587653.
Article
21. Alonso MB, Cortes AR, Camargo AJ, et al. Assessment of panoramic radiomorphometric indices of the mandible in a brazilian population. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011; 2011:854287. PMID: 22389803.
Article
22. Singh SV, Aggarwal H, Gupta V, et al. Measurements in mandibular pantomographic X-rays and relation to skeletal mineral densitometric values. J Clin Densitom. 2016; 19:255–261. PMID: 25934028.
Article
23. Bauer DC, Garnero P, Harrison SL, et al. Biochemical markers of bone turnover, hip bone loss, and fracture in older men: the MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24:2032–2038. PMID: 19453262.
Article
24. Hlaing TT, Compston JE. Biochemical markers of bone turnover - uses and limitations. Ann Clin Biochem. 2014; 51:189–202. PMID: 24399365.
Article
25. Löfman O, Magnusson P, Toss G, et al. Common biochemical markers of bone turnover predict future bone loss: a 5-year follow-up study. Clin Chim Acta. 2005; 356:67–75. PMID: 15936304.
Article
26. Baxter I, Rogers A, Eastell R, et al. Evaluation of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen measurements in the management of osteoporosis in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24:941–947. PMID: 22872068.
Article
27. Wheater G, Elshahaly M, Tuck SP, et al. The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis. J Transl Med. 2013; 11:201. PMID: 23984630.
Article
28. Greenblatt MB, Tsai JN, Wein MN. Bone turnover markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of metabolic bone disease. Clin Chem. 2017; 63:464–474. PMID: 27940448.
Article
29. Rosen CJ, Chesnut CH 3rd, Mallinak NJ. The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement or calcium supplementation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82:1904–1910. PMID: 9177404.
Article
30. Burch J, Rice S, Yang H, et al. Systematic review of the use of bone turnover markers for monitoring the response to osteoporosis treatment: the secondary prevention of fractures, and primary prevention of fractures in high-risk groups. Health Technol Assess. 2014; 18:1–180.
Article
31. Cosman F, Nieves J, Wilkinson C, et al. Bone density change and biochemical indices of skeletal turnover. Calcif Tissue Int. 1996; 58:236–243. PMID: 8661954.
Article
32. Sharma G, Johal AS, Liversidge HM. Predicting agenesis of the mandibular second premolar from adjacent teeth. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0144180. PMID: 26673218.
Article
33. Kavitha MS, Park SY, Heo MS, et al. Distributional variations in the quantitative cortical and trabecular bone radiographic measurements of mandible, between male and female populations of Korea, and its utilization. PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0167992. PMID: 28002443.
Article
34. Roberts M, Yuan J, Graham J, et al. Changes in mandibular cortical width measurements with age in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22:1915–1925. PMID: 20886206.
Article
35. Sindeaux R, Figueiredo PT, de Melo NS, et al. Fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width in normal and osteoporotic men and women. Maturitas. 2014; 77:142–148. PMID: 24289895.
Article
36. Kim JW, Ha YC, Lee YK. Factors affecting bone mineral density measurement after fracture in South Korea. J Bone Metab. 2017; 24:217–222. PMID: 29259960.
Article
37. Benson BW, Prihoda TJ, Glass BJ. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991; 71:349–356. PMID: 2011361.
Article
38. White SC, Taguchi A, Kao D, et al. Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16:339–346. PMID: 15726238.
Article
39. Shakeel MK, Daniel MJ, Srinivasan SV, et al. Comparative analysis of linear and angular measurements on digital orthopantomogram with calcaneus bone mineral density. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9:ZC12–ZC16.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr