Yonsei Med J.  2018 Oct;59(8):923-929. 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.923.

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Stomach Cancer Screening in Korea, 2005–2015: After the Introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program

• Lee EY
• Lee YY
• Suh M
• Choi E
• Mai TT
• Cho H
• Park B
• Jun JK
• Kim Y
• Oh JK
• Ki M
• Choi KS

• KMID: 2419725
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.923

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to investigate socioeconomic inequalities in stomach cancer screening in Korea and trends therein across income and education groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, a nationwide cross-sectional survey, were utilized. A total of 28913 men and women aged 40 to 74 years were included for analysis. Prior experience with stomach cancer screening was defined as having undergone either an endoscopy or gastrointestinal series within the past two years. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) were evaluated to check inequalities.
RESULTS
Stomach cancer screening rates increased from 40.0% in 2005 to 74.8% in 2015, with an annual percent change of 5.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2 to 7.5]. Increases in stomach cancer screening rates were observed for all age, education, and household income groups. Inequalities in stomach cancer screening were noted among individuals of differing levels of education, with a pooled SII estimate of 6.14% (95% CI, 3.94 to 8.34) and RII of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.40). Also, income-related inequalities were observed with an SII of 6.93% (95% CI, 4.89 to 8.97) and RII of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.43). The magnitude of inequality was larger for income than for education.
CONCLUSION
Both education and income-related inequalities were found in stomach cancer screening, despite a continuous increase in screening rate over the study period. Income-related inequality was greater than education-related inequality, and this was more apparent in women than in men.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasm; mass screening; inequalities; early detection of cancer

MeSH Terms

Cross-Sectional Studies
Early Detection of Cancer*
Education
Endoscopy
Family Characteristics
Female
Humans
Korea*
Male
Mass Screening*
Socioeconomic Factors*
Stomach Neoplasms*
Stomach*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Absolute and relative inequalities in stomach cancer screening from 2005 to 2015. (A) Absolute educational inequalities in stomach cancer screening rates. (B) Relative educational inequalities in stomach cancer screening rates. (C) Absolute household income inequalities in stomach cancer screening rates. (D) Relative household income inequalities in stomach cancer screening rates. Solid line represents the line of equality; dotted line reflects pooled coefficients. SII, slope index of inequality; RII, relative index of inequality; CI, confidence interval.

Reference

1. Hamashima C, Goto R. Potential capacity of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Japan. Cancer Sci. 2017; 108:101–107. PMID: 27727490.

2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65:87–108. PMID: 25651787.

3. Goto R, Hamashima C, Mun S, Lee WC. Why screening rates vary between Korea and Japan--differences between two national healthcare systems. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16:395–400. PMID: 25684461.

4. Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Lee DH, Lee KH. Community of population-based regional cancer registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2014. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 49:292–305. PMID: 28279062.

5. Lee HY, Park EC, Jun JK, Hahm MI, Jung KW, Kim Y, et al. Trends in socioeconomic disparities in organized and opportunistic gastric cancer screening in Korea (2005-2009). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19:1919–1926. PMID: 20647409.

6. Kweon SS, Kim MG, Kang MR, Shin MH, Choi JS. Difference of stage at cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic status for four target cancers of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: Results from the Gwangju and Jeonnam cancer registries. J Epidemiol. 2017; 27:299–304. PMID: 28279589.

7. Suh M, Song S, Cho HN, Park B, Jun JK, Choi E, et al. Trends in participation rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2002-2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 49:798–806. PMID: 27857022.

8. Suh M, Choi KS, Park B, Lee YY, Jun JK, Lee DH, et al. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2013. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:1–10. PMID: 25943324.

9. Palència L, Espelt A, Rodríguez-Sanz M, Puigpinós R, Pons-Vigués M, Pasarín MI, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39:757–765. PMID: 20176587.

10. Kwon YM, Lim HT, Lee K, Cho BL, Park MS, Son KY, et al. Factors associated with use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15:3653–3659. PMID: 19653344.

11. Lee K, Lim HT, Hwang SS, Chae DW, Park SM. Erratum to: “Socioeconomic disparities in behavioural risk factors for cancer and use of cancer screening services in Korean adults aged 30 years and older: The Third Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005 (KNHANES III)” [Public Health 124 (2010): 698–704]. Public Health. 2011; 125:243.

12. Park B, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK, Seo HG. Cancer screening status in Korea, 2011: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13:1187–1191. PMID: 22799303.

13. Harper S, Lynch J. Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to healthy people 2010 cancer related objectives. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, Number 6. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute;2005.

14. Hosseinpoor AR, Nambiar D, Schlotheuber A, Reidpath D, Ross Z. Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT): software for exploring and comparing health inequalities in countries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:141. PMID: 27760520.

15. Katz SJ, Hofer TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA. 1994; 272:530–534. PMID: 8046807.

16. Kelly DM, Estaquio C, Léon C, Arwidson P, Nabi H. Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys. BMJ Open. 2017; 7:e016941.

17. Kim J, Jang SN. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008; 41:186–194. PMID: 18515996.

18. Shin JY, Lee DH. Factors associated with the use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008 (KNHANES IV). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13:3773–3779. PMID: 23098470.