Yonsei Med J.  2017 May;58(3):497-504. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.3.497.

Port-Site Metastases and Chimney Effect of B-Ultrasound-Guided and Laparoscopically-Assisted Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy

Affiliations
  • 1Intracelom Hyperthermic Perfusion Therapy Center, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China. bamingchen@126.com
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Dermatology Institute, Guangzhou, P.R. China. 798587414@qq.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
COâ‚‚ leakage along the trocar (chimney effect) has been proposed to be an important factor underlying port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to test this hypothesis by comparing the incidence of port-site metastasis between B-ultrasound-guided and laparoscopically-assisted hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPPC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixty-two patients with malignant ascites induced by gastrointestinal or ovarian cancer were divided into two groups to receive either B-ultrasound-guided or laparoscopically-assisted HIPPC. Clinical efficacy was assessed from the objective remission rate (ORR), the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, and overall survival. The incidence of port-site metastasis was compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
Patients in the B-ultrasound (n=32) and laparoscopy (n=30) groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, primary disease type, volume of ascites, and free cancer cell (FCC)-positive ascites. After HIPPC, there were no significant differences between the B-ultrasound and laparoscopy groups in the KPS score change, ORR, and median survival time. The incidence of port-site metastasis after HIPPC was not significantly different between the B-ultrasound (3 of 32, 9.36%) and laparoscopy (3 of 30, 10%) groups, but significantly different among pancreatic, gastric, ovarian, and colorectal cancer (33.33, 15.79, 10.00, and 0.00%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
The chimney effect may not be the key reason for port-site metastasis after laparoscopy. Other factors may play a role, including the local microenvironment at the trocar site and the delivery of viable FCCs (from the tumor or malignant ascites) to the trauma site during laparoscopic surgery.

Keyword

Chimney effect; laparoscopy; B-ultrasound; HIPPC; port-site metastasis

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma/etiology/*secondary
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents/*administration & dosage
Ascites/*drug therapy/etiology
Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion/*methods
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy/pathology
Female
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced/*methods
Incidence
Laparoscopy/adverse effects/*methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy/pathology
Peritoneal Cavity
Peritoneal Neoplasms/complications/*drug therapy
Prospective Studies
Remission Induction
Surgical Instruments
Ultrasonography, Interventional/*methods
Antineoplastic Agents

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Placement sites for the infusion and outflow catheters, for B-ultrasound-guided HIPPC (A) and laparoscopically-assisted HIPPC (B). a mark the two infusion catheters, b mark the two outflow catheters, and the white clips mark the loop circuit for HIPPC preparation. HIPPC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy.

  • Fig. 2 Abdominal CT scan (axial) showing a port-site metastasis (arrow) on the right abdominal wall.

  • Fig. 3 Abdominal CT scan (axial) in a patient with gastric cancer exhibiting port-site metastasis (arrow) and recurrence of ascites 3 months after B-ultrasound-guided hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy.

  • Fig. 4 Histopathological examination of a resected tumor (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×400). The metastatic nodule resected from the abdominal wall was a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; the pathological type and degree of differentiation were the same as those of the primary tumor.

  • Fig. 5 Immunohistochemical assessment of a metastatic nodule in the abdominal wall (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×100). The carcinoembryonic antigen expression of the metastatic nodule was the same as that of the primary tumor.


Cited by  1 articles

Laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery for the Treatment of Huge Ovarian Cysts Using an Angiocatheter Needle
Eun Young Ki, Eun Kyung Park, In Cheol Jeong, Sung Eun Bak, Hye Sung Hwang, Yoo Hyun Chung, Min Jong Song
Yonsei Med J. 2019;60(9):864-869.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.9.864.


Reference

1. Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA, Peterson LB, Sultana N, Bigsby GE 4th, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 115:447–452.
Article
2. Young-Fadok T, Talac R, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer; the need for trials. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 1999; 19:94–101.
3. Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012; 36:2879–2887.
Article
4. Fagotti A, Vizzielli G, Costantini B, Lecca A, Gallotta V, Gagliardi ML, et al. Learning curve and pitfalls of a laparoscopic score to describe peritoneal carcinosis in advanced ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90:1126–1131.
Article
5. Lanowska M, Mangler M, Spek A, Grittner U, Hasenbein K, Chiantera V, et al. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: prospective study of 225 patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011; 21:1458–1464.
Article
6. Curet MJ, Putrakul K, Pitcher DE, Josloff RK, Zucker KA. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma: perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14:1062–1066.
Article
7. Zmora O, Weiss EG. Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Myth or real concern? Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001; 10:625–638.
8. Berretta R, Rolla M, Patrelli TS, Gramellini D, Fadda GM, Nardelli GB. Incidence of port-site metastasis after laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: a series of 22 patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009; 30:300–302.
9. Zivanovic O, Sonoda Y, Diaz JP, Levine DA, Brown CL, Chi DS, et al. The rate of port-site metastases after 2251 laparoscopic procedures in women with underlying malignant disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111:431–437.
Article
10. Eng MK, Katz MH, Bernstein AJ, Shikanov S, Shalhav AL, Zorn KC. Laparoscopic port-site metastasis in urologic surgery. J Endourol. 2008; 22:1581–1585.
Article
11. Kruitwagen RF, Swinkels BM, Keyser KG, Doesburg WH, Schijf CP. Incidence and effect on survival of abdominal wall metastases at trocar or puncture sites following laparoscopy or paracentesis in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 60:233–237.
Article
12. Agostini A, Robin F, Aggerbeck M, Jaïs JP, Blanc B, Lécuru F. Influence of peritoneal factors on port-site metastases in a xenograft ovarian cancer model. BJOG. 2001; 108:809–812.
Article
13. Tseng LN, Berends FJ, Wittich P, Bouvy ND, Marquet RL, Kazemier G, et al. Port-site metastases. Impact of local tissue trauma and gas leakage. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12:1377–1380.
14. Allardyce RA, Morreau P, Bagshaw PF. Operative factors affecting tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40:939–945.
Article
15. Ziprin P, Ridgway PF, Peck DH, Darzi AW. The theories and realities of port-site metastases: a critical appraisal. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195:395–408.
16. Wang PH, Yuan CC, Lin G, Ng HT, Chao HT. Risk factors contributing to early occurrence of port site metastases of laparoscopic surgery for malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 72:38–44.
Article
17. Whelan RL, Lee SW. Review of investigations regarding the etiology of port site tumor recurrence. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999; 9:1–16.
Article
18. Iwanaka T, Arya G, Ziegler MM. Mechanism and prevention of port-site tumor recurrence after laparoscopy in a murine model. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33:457–461.
Article
19. Hewett PJ, Thomas WM, King G, Eaton M. Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy. An in vivo model. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39:10 Suppl. S62–S66.
20. Jacobi CA, Sabat R, Böhm B, Zieren HU, Volk HD, Mûller JM. Pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide stimulates growth of malignant colonic cells. Surgery. 1997; 121:72–78.
Article
21. Hubens G, Pauwels M, Hubens A, Vermeulen P, Van Marck E, Eyskens E. The influence of a pneumoperitoneum on the peritoneal implantation of free intraperitoneal colon cancer cells. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10:809–812.
Article
22. Canis M, Botchorishvili R, Wattiez A, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA. Tumor growth and dissemination after laparotomy and CO2 pneumoperitoneum: a rat ovarian cancer model. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92:104–108.
Article
23. Mathew G, Watson DI, Rofe AM, Ellis T, Jamieson GG. Adverse impact of pneumoperitoneum on intraperitoneal implantation and growth of tumour cell suspension in an experimental model. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997; 67:289–292.
Article
24. Gutt CN, Riemer V, Kim ZG, Jacobi CA, Paolucci V, Lorenz M. Impact of laparoscopic colonic resection on tumour growth and spread in an experimental model. Br J Surg. 1999; 86:1180–1184.
Article
25. Allendorf JD, Bessler M, Kayton ML, Oesterling SD, Treat MR, Nowygrod R, et al. Increased tumor establishment and growth after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in a murine model. Arch Surg. 1995; 130:649–653.
Article
26. Yamaguchi K, Hirabayashi Y, Shiromizu A, Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S. Enhancement of port site metastasis by hyaluronic acid under CO2 pneumoperitoneum in a murine model. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:504–507.
Article
27. Watson DI, Mathew G, Ellis T, Baigrie CF, Rofe AM, Jamieson GG. Gasless laparoscopy may reduce the risk of port-site metastases following laparascopic tumor surgery. Arch Surg. 1997; 132:166–168.
Article
28. Bouvy ND, Giuffrida MC, Tseng LN, Steyerberg EW, Marquet RL, Jeekel H, et al. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, air pneumoperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on body weight and tumor growth. Arch Surg. 1998; 133:652–656.
Article
29. Bouvy ND, Marquet RL, Jeekel H, Bonjer HJ. Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases. Ann Surg. 1996; 224:694–700.
Article
30. Murthy SM, Goldschmidt RA, Rao LN, Ammirati M, Buchmann T, Scanlon EF. The influence of surgical trauma on experimental metastasis. Cancer. 1989; 64:2035–2044.
Article
31. Little D, Regan M, Keane RM, Bouchier-Hayes D. Perioperative immune modulation. Surgery. 1993; 114:87–91.
32. Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Peptide growth factors and inflammation, tissue repair, and cancer. J Clin Invest. 1986; 78:329–332.
Article
33. Facchiano E, Scaringi S, Kianmanesh R, Sabate JM, Castel B, Flamant Y, et al. Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of malignant ascites secondary to unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis from advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008; 34:154–158.
Article
34. Garofalo A, Valle M, Garcia J, Sugarbaker PH. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for palliation of debilitating malignant ascites. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006; 32:682–685.
Article
35. Valle M, Van der Speeten K, Garofalo A. Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of refractory malignant ascites: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis in 52 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2009; 100:331–334.
Article
36. Ba MC, Cui SZ, Lin SQ, Tang YQ, Wu YB, Wang B, et al. Chemotherapy with laparoscope-assisted continuous circulatory hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion for malignant ascites. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16:1901–1907.
Article
37. Ba MC, Long H, Cui SZ, Tang YQ, Wu YB, Zhang XL, et al. Multivariate comparison of B-ultrasound guided and laparoscopic continuous circulatory hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for malignant ascites. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:2735–2743.
Article
38. Cui S, Ba M, Tang Y, Liu J, Wu Y, Wang B, et al. B ultrasound-guided hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant ascites. Oncol Rep. 2012; 28:1325–1331.
Article
39. Liang D, Ma Y, Liu J, Trope CG, Holm R, Nesland JM, et al. The hypoxic microenvironment upgrades stem-like properties of ovarian cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12:201.
Article
40. Conley SJ, Gheordunescu E, Kakarala P, Newman B, Korkaya H, Heath AN, et al. Antiangiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via the generation of tumor hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109:2784–2789.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr