J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2016;13:37. 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.37.

Continuing education requirements among State Occupational Therapy Regulatory Boards in the United States of America

• Hall SR
• Crifasi KA
• Marinelli
• Yuen HK

• KMID: 2413786
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.37

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the contents of each state's occupational therapy (OT) regulatory board requirements regarding licensees' acquisition of continuing education units in the United States of America.
METHODS
Data related to continuing education requirements from each OT regulatory board of all 50 states and the District of Columbia in the United States were reviewed and categorized by two reviewers. Analysis was conducted based on the categorization of the continuing education requirements and activities required, allowed, and not allowed/not mentioned for continuing education units.
RESULTS
Findings revealed non-uniformity and inconsistency of continuing education requirements for licensure renewal between OT regulatory boards and was coupled with lack of specific criteria for various continuing education activities. Continuing education requirements were not tailored to meet the needs of individual licensee's current and anticipated professional role and job responsibilities, with a negative bias towards presentation and publication allowed for continuing education units. Few boards mandated continuing education topics on ethics related to OT practice within each renewal cycle.
CONCLUSION
OT regulatory boards should move towards unifying the reporting format of continuing education requirements across all states to reduce ambiguity and to ensure licensees are equipped to provide ethical and competent practice. Efforts could be made to enact continuing education requirements specific to the primary role of a particular licensee. Finally, assigning the amount of continuing education credits to be awarded for different activities should be based on research evidence rather than arbitrary determination.

Keyword

Continuing education; Licensure; Occupational therapy; Professional competence; United States

MeSH Terms

Americas*
Awards and Prizes
Bias (Epidemiology)
Education, Continuing*
Ethics
Licensure
Occupational Therapy*
Professional Competence
Professional Role
Publications
United States*

Reference

References

1. Braeman B. Leading & managing occupational therapy services: an evidence-based approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis;2016.

2. Willmarth C. State regulation of occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants. In : Jacobs K, McCormack GL, editors. The occupational therapy manager. 5th ed. Bethesda (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association;2011. p. 455–468.

3. Moyers Cleveland PA, Hinojosa J. Continuing competence and competency. In : Jacobs K, McCormack GL, editors. The occupational therapy manager. 5th ed. Bethesda (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association;2011. p. 485–501.

4. Fisher GS. Mandatory continuing education: the future of occupational therapy professional development? Occup Ther Health Care. 2001; 13:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v13n02_01.

5. Long PJ, Emery LJ. Continuing education: a clinician’s guide to monitoring and promoting competence. Occup Ther Health Care. 2000; 12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v12n04_01.

6. American Occupational Therapy Association. Model continuing competence guidelines for occupational therapists and occupational therapy assistants: a resource for State Regulatory Boards [Internet]. Rockville (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association;2003. [cited 2016 Jan 11]. Available from: https://www.aota.org/media/corporate/files/advocacy/state/resources/contcomp/modceguidelines.pdf.

7. National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy. NBCOT certification renewal activities chart [Internet]. Gaithersburg (MD): The National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy Inc.;2015. [cited 2016 Jan 11]. Available from: http://www.nbcot.org/pdf/cra-chart.

8. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005; 37:360–363.

9. DeSilets LD. The institute of medicine’s redesigning continuing education in the health professions. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010; 41:340–341. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20100726-02.

10. Miller SH, Thompson JN, Mazmanian PE, Aparicio A, Davis DA, Spivey BE, Kahn NB. Continuing medical education, professional development, and requirements for medical licensure: a white paper of the Conjoint Committee on Continuing Medical Education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008; 28:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.164.

11. Dopp AL, Moulton JR, Rouse MJ, Trewet CB. A five-state continuing professional development pilot program for practicing pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74:28. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj740228.

12. Occupational Therapy Code of Ethics (2015). Am J Occup Ther. 2015; 69 Suppl 3:6913410030p1–8. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.696s03.