Cancer Res Treat.  2018 Apr;50(2):488-494. 10.4143/crt.2016.584.

Pazopanib for the Treatment of Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hoylim@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Division of Hematology and Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Division of Hematology and Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
  • 6Division of Hematology and Oncology, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
  • 7Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Division of Oncology-Hematology, Department of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 9Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The optimal treatment strategy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell type renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear. Although several inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor have recently shown efficacy against nccRCC, the clinical benefit of pazopanib in nccRCC has not been analyzed. We therefore designed a single-arm, open-label, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with nccRCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC, exceptfor collecting duct or sarcomatoid type, received 800 mg/day of pazopanib daily until progression of disease or intolerable toxicity. One cyclewas defined as 4 weeks and tumor response was evaluated every two cycles. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR).
RESULTS
A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled at nine centers in Korea from December 2012 and September 2014. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 27 to 76 years) and 21 patients (72%) were male. Regarding histology type, 19 patients had papillary, three had chromophobe, two had unclassified and five had unknown non-clear cell type. Of 28 evaluable patients, eight achieved a confirmed partial response with ORR of 28%. The median progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.9 to 22.1) and median overall survival was not reached. Sixteen patients (55%) experienced treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or more, but most adverse events were overcome through dose reduction and delay.
CONCLUSION
In this prospective phase II study, pazopanib demonstrated promising activity and tolerable safety profile in patients with metastatic nccRCC.

Keyword

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma; Pazopanib; Phase II study

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Renal Cell*
Disease-Free Survival
Humans
Korea
Male
Prospective Studies
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Progression-free survival (PFS) (A) and overall survival (OS) (B) of 28 patients. CI, confidence interval.


Cited by  1 articles

Temsirolimus in Asian Metastatic/Recurrent Non-clear Cell Renal Carcinoma
Jii Bum Lee, Hyung Soon Park, Sejung Park, Hyo Jin Lee, Kyung A Kwon, Young Jin Choi, Yu Jung Kim, Chung Mo Nam, Nam Hoon Cho, Beodeul Kang, Hyun Cheol Chung, Sun Young Rha
Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1578-1588.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.671.


Reference

References

1. Leibovich BC, Lohse CM, Crispen PL, Boorjian SA, Thompson RH, Blute ML, et al. Histological subtype is an independent predictor of outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010; 183:1309–15.
Article
2. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Mariani T, Russo P, Mazumdar M, Reuter V. Treatment outcome and survival associated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of non-clear-cell histology. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:2376–81.
Article
3. Vera-Badillo FE, Templeton AJ, Duran I, Ocana A, de Gouveia P, Aneja P, et al. Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 67:740–9.
Article
4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology, kidney cancer. version 2. 2016 [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network;2016. [cited 2016 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf.
5. Dutcher JP, de Souza P, McDermott D, Figlin RA, Berkenblit A, Thiele A, et al. Effect of temsirolimus versus interferon-alpha on outcome of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma of different tumor histologies. Med Oncol. 2009; 26:202–9.
6. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356:2271–81.
Article
7. Heng DY, Bukowski RM. Anti-angiogenic targets in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008; 8:676–82.
Article
8. Rini BI. Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2009; 115(10 Suppl):2306–12.
Article
9. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, et al. Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:1061–8.
Article
10. Sternberg CN, Hawkins RE, Wagstaff J, Salman P, Mardiak J, Barrios CH, et al. A randomised, double-blind phase III study of pazopanib in patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: final overall survival results and safety update. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49:1287–96.
Article
11. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Cella D, Reeves J, Hawkins R, Guo J, et al. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:722–31.
Article
12. Altorki N, Lane ME, Bauer T, Lee PC, Guarino MJ, Pass H, et al. Phase II proof-of-concept study of pazopanib monotherapy in treatment-naive patients with stage I/II resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:3131–7.
Article
13. Friedlander M, Hancock KC, Rischin D, Messing MJ, Stringer CA, Matthys GM, et al. A Phase II, open-label study evaluating pazopanib in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 119:32–7.
Article
14. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012; 379:1879–86.
Article
15. Gore ME, Szczylik C, Porta C, Bracarda S, Bjarnason GA, Oudard S, et al. Final results from the large sunitinib global expanded-access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2015; 113:12–9.
16. Choueiri TK, Plantade A, Elson P, Negrier S, Ravaud A, Oudard S, et al. Efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:127–31.
Article
17. Lee JL, Ahn JH, Lim HY, Park SH, Lee SH, Kim TM, et al. Multicenter phase II study of sunitinib in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23:2108–14.
Article
18. Matrana MR, Baiomy A, Campbell M, Alamri S, Shetty A, Teegavarapu P, et al. Outcomes of patients with metastatic nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with pazopanib. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017; 15:e205–8.
Article
19. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Bacik J, Berg W, Amsterdam A, Ferrara J. Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17:2530–40.
Article
20. Koh Y, Lim HY, Ahn JH, Lee JL, Rha SY, Kim YJ, et al. Phase II trial of everolimus for the treatment of nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24:1026–31.
Article
21. Gordon MS, Hussey M, Nagle RB, Lara PN Jr, Mack PC, Dutcher J, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic papillary histology renal cell cancer: SWOG S0317. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:5788–93.
Article
22. Armstrong AJ, Halabi S, Eisen T, Broderick S, Stadler WM, Jones RJ, et al. Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17:378–88.
Article
23. Sankin A, Hakimi AA, Hsieh JJ, Molina AM. Metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma: an evidence based review of current treatment strategies. Front Oncol. 2015; 5:67.
Article
24. Tannir NM, Plimack E, Ng C, Tamboli P, Bekele NB, Xiao L, et al. A phase 2 trial of sunitinib in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2012; 62:1013–9.
Article
25. Necchi A, Mariani L, Zaffaroni N, Schwartz LH, Giannatempo P, Crippa F, et al. Pazopanib in advanced and platinum-resistant urothelial cancer: an open-label, single group, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13:810–6.
Article
26. Qi WX, Sun YJ, Tang LN, Shen Z, Yao Y. Risk of gastrointestinal perforation in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014; 89:394–403.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr