Cancer Res Treat.  2018 Apr;50(2):366-373. 10.4143/crt.2017.126.

Sub-classification of Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cohort Study Including 612 Patients Treated with Sorafenib

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pindra@empal.com
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Gangnam Healthcare Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine Liver Center, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with various clinical conditions including major vessel invasion, metastasis, and poor performance status. The aim of this study was to establish a prognostic scoring system and to propose a sub-classification of the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study included consecutive patients who received sorafenib for BCLC stage C HCC at a single tertiary hospital in Korea. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop a scoring system, and internal validationwas performed by a 5-fold cross-validation. The performance of the model in predicting risk was assessed by the area under the curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
RESULTS
A total of 612 BCLC stage C HCC patients were sub- classified into strata depending on their performance status. Five independent prognostic factors (Child-Pugh score, α-fetoprotein, tumor type, extrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein invasion) were identified and used in the prognostic scoring system. This scoring system showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.734 to 0.818) and calibration functions (both p < 0.05 by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test at 1 month and 12 months, respectively). The differences in survival among the different risk groups classified by the total score were significant (p < 0.001 by the log-rank test in both the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 and 1 strata).
CONCLUSION
The heterogeneity of patientswith BCLC stage C HCC requires sub-classification of advanced HCC. A prognostic scoring system with five independent factors is useful in predicting the survival of patients with BCLC stage C HCC.

Keyword

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Advanced-stage; Sorafenib; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Calibration
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular*
Cohort Studies*
Discrimination (Psychology)
Humans
Korea
Liver Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Population Characteristics
Portal Vein
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Tertiary Care Centers

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The results of internal validation using 5-fold cross-validation at each time point.

  • Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the cumulative overall survival rate according to the risk group. (A) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0. (B) EGOG PS 1.


Cited by  2 articles

Sorafenib for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation
Bo Hyun Kim, Joong-Won Park
J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(45):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e286.

Subclassification of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: combined transarterial chemoembolization and radiotherapy as an alternative first-line treatment
Sujin Jin, Won-Mook Choi, Ju Hyun Shim, Danbi Lee, Kang Mo Kim, Young-Suk Lim, Han Chu Lee, Jinhong Jung, Sang Min Yoon, Jonggi Choi
J Liver Cancer. 2023;23(1):177-188.    doi: 10.17998/jlc.2023.03.04.


Reference

References

1. Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen PJ, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE Study. Liver Int. 2015; 35:2155–66.
2. El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:1118–27.
Article
3. Sherman M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, surveillance, and diagnosis. Semin Liver Dis. 2010; 30:3–16.
Article
4. Chan AC, Poon RT, Ng KK, Lo CM, Fan ST, Wong J. Changing paradigm in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma improves the survival benefit of early detection by screening. Ann Surg. 2008; 247:666–73.
Article
5. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003; 37:429–42.
Article
6. Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, et al. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100:698–711.
Article
7. Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005; 42:1208–36.
Article
8. European Association for the Study of the Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012; 56:908–43.
9. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012; 379:1245–55.
Article
10. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:378–90.
Article
11. Cabibbo G, Enea M, Attanasio M, Bruix J, Craxi A, Camma C. A meta-analysis of survival rates of untreated patients in randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010; 51:1274–83.
Article
12. Yau T, Tang VY, Yao TJ, Fan ST, Lo CM, Poon RT. Development of Hong Kong Liver Cancer staging system with treatment stratification for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2014; 146:1691–700.
Article
13. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC;1994.
14. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S. The multiple logistic regression model: applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1989.
15. Yopp AC, Mokdad A, Zhu H, Mansour JC, Balch GC, Choti MA, et al. Infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: natural history and comparison with multifocal, nodular hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22 Suppl 3:S1075–82.
Article
16. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis. 1999; 19:329–38.
Article
17. Okuda K, Ohtsuki T, Obata H, Tomimatsu M, Okazaki N, Hasegawa H, et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment: study of 850 patients. Cancer. 1985; 56:918–28.
Article
18. Lei HJ, Chau GY, Lui WY, Tsay SH, King KL, Loong CC, et al. Prognostic value and clinical relevance of the 6th Edition 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203:426–35.
Article
19. A new prognostic system for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 435 patients: the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) investigators. Hepatology. 1998; 28:751–5.
20. Tandon P, Garcia-Tsao G. Prognostic indicators in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of 72 studies. Liver Int. 2009; 29:502–10.
Article
21. Adhoute X, Penaranda G, Raoul JL, Blanc JF, Edeline J, Conroy G, et al. Prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a new stratification of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C: results from a French multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 28:433–40.
22. Benvegnu L, Noventa F, Bernardinello E, Pontisso P, Gatta A, Alberti A. Evidence for an association between the aetiology of cirrhosis and pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma development. Gut. 2001; 48:110–5.
Article
23. Kneuertz PJ, Demirjian A, Firoozmand A, Corona-Villalobos C, Bhagat N, Herman J, et al. Diffuse infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19:2897–907.
Article
24. Demirjian A, Peng P, Geschwind JF, Cosgrove D, Schutz J, Kamel IR, et al. Infiltrating hepatocellular carcinoma: seeing the tree through the forest. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15:2089–97.
Article
25. Sereni CP, Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Goykhman I. Portal vein thrombus and infiltrative HCC: a pictoral review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42:159–70.
Article
26. Shah ZK, McKernan MG, Hahn PF, Sahani DV. Enhancing and expansile portal vein thrombosis: value in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with multiple hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188:1320–3.
Article
27. Pirisi M, Avellini C, Fabris C, Scott C, Bardus P, Soardo G, et al. Portal vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: age and sex distribution in an autopsy study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1998; 124:397–400.
Article
28. Carr BI, Guerra V. Low alpha-fetoprotein levels are associated with improved survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61:937–47.
Article
29. Liu C, Xiao GQ, Yan LN, Li B, Jiang L, Wen TF, et al. Value of alpha-fetoprotein in association with clinicopathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19:1811–9.
30. Zhang N, Gu J, Yin L, Wu J, Du MY, Ding K, et al. Incorporation of alpha-fetoprotein into subclassification of BCLC C stage hepatocellular carcinoma according to a 5-year survival analysis based on the SEER database. Oncotarget. 2016; 7:81389–401.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr