Ann Surg Treat Res.  2018 May;94(5):254-261. 10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.254.

Validation of the Korean version of visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome questionnaire for assessment of defecation pattern changes

Affiliations
  • 1Center for Colorectal Cance, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. gsgsbal@ncc.re.kr
  • 2Biometrics Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 3Korean Language and Literature, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.
  • 5Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, and Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital and Cancer Control and Public Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 6Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 7Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Patients often complain of change of defecation pattern and it is necessary to quantify their symptoms. To quantify symptoms, use of questionnaire is ideal, so we adopted a simple and easily writable visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome questionnaire (VAS-IBS). The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Korean version of VAS-IBS questionnaire (Korean VAS-IBS) that can adequately reflect the defecation pattern.
METHODS
This study translated English VAS-IBS into Korean using the forward-and-back translation method. Korean VAS-IBS was performed on 30 patients, who visited the outpatient clinic and had no possibility of special defecation pattern. Detailed past medical history and Bristol stool chart was added to the questionnaire. The survey was conducted twice, and the median interval between the 2 surveys was 10 days (8-11 days). Cronbach α for internal consistency reliability and intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability were analyzed.
RESULTS
Korean VAS-IBS achieved acceptable homogeneity with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.66-0.79 showing adequate internal consistency reliability. In addition, intraclass correlation coefficients showed significant test-retest reliability with 0.46-0.80 except for the question assessing the "perception of psychological wellbeing."
CONCLUSION
The Korean VAS-IBS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the measurement of the symptoms of defecation pattern changes.

Keyword

Surveys and questionnaire; Defecation; Visual analog scale; Translations

MeSH Terms

Ambulatory Care Facilities
Defecation*
Humans
Irritable Bowel Syndrome*
Methods
Reproducibility of Results
Translations
Visual Analog Scale

Figure

  • Fig. 1 English and Korean versions of the Visual Analogue Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (VAS-IBS) questionnaire.


Reference

1. Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Van Dyke C, Melton LJ 3rd. Epidemiology of colonic symptoms and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1991; 101:927–934.
Article
2. Jun DW, Park HY, Lee OY, Lee HL, Yoon BC, Choi HS, et al. A population-based study on bowel habits in a Korean community: prevalence of functional constipation and self-reported constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2006; 51:1471–1477.
Article
3. Talley NJ, Phillips SF, Melton J 3rd, Wiltgen C, Zinsmeister AR. A patient questionnaire to identify bowel disease. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111:671–674.
Article
4. Bengtsson M, Ohlsson B, Ulander K. Development and psychometric testing of the Visual Analogue Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (VAS-IBS). BMC Gastroenterol. 2007; 7:16.
Article
5. Bengtsson M, Persson J, Sjolund K, Ohlsson B. Further validation of the visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome after use in clinical practice. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2013; 36:188–198.
Article
6. Bengtsson M, Hammar O, Mandl T, Ohlsson B. Evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms in different patient groups using the visual analogue scale for irritable bowel syndrome (VAS-IBS). BMC Gastroenterol. 2011; 11:122.
Article
7. Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7:75–83.
8. Song KH, Jung HK, Min BH, Youn YH, Choi KD, Keum BR, et al. Development and validation of the Korean rome III questionnaire for diagnosis of functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 19:509–515.
Article
9. Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, Gottesman L, Paty PB, Weiser MR, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48:1353–1365.
Article
10. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997; 32:920–924.
Article
11. Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof. 2005; 28:212–232.
Article
12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25:3186–3191.
Article
13. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press;2014.
14. Peters GJ. The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach's alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. Eur Health Psychol. 2014; 16:56–69.
Article
15. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994; 6:284–290.
Article
16. Wiklund IK, Fullerton S, Hawkey CJ, Jones RH, Longstreth GF, Mayer EA, et al. An irritable bowel syndrome-specific symptom questionnaire: development and validation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003; 38:947–954.
17. Posserud I, Syrous A, Lindstrom L, Tack J, Abrahamsson H, Simrén M. Altered rectal perception in irritable bowel syndrome is associated with symptom severity. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133:1113–1123.
Article
18. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983; 16:87–101.
Article
19. Rao SS, Camilleri M, Hasler WL, Maurer AH, Parkman HP, Saad R, et al. Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011; 23:8–23.
Article
20. Lane MM, Czyzewski DI, Chumpitazi BP, Shulman RJ. Reliability and validity of a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale for children. J Pediatr. 2011; 159:437–441.e1.
Article
21. Monane M, Avorn J, Beers MH, Everitt DE. Anticholinergic drug use and bowel function in nursing home patients. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153:633–638.
Article
22. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Müller-Lissner SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999; 45 Suppl 2. II43–II47.
Article
23. Kamm MA, Farthing MJ, Lennard-Jones JE. Bowel function and transit rate during the menstrual cycle. Gut. 1989; 30:605–608.
Article
24. Johanson JF, Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25:599–608.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr