J Adv Prosthodont.  2018 Feb;10(1):43-49. 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.43.

Influence of nano alumina coating on the flexural bond strength between zirconia and resin cement

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Osmangazi University, EskiÅŸehir, Turkey. cnngcr2@hotmail.com
  • 2Ministry of Health Karapürçek Oral and Dental Health Clinics, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 3Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 4Department of Chemistry, Polymer Chemistry Division, Hacettepe University, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this in vitro study is to examine the effects of a nano-structured alumina coating on the adhesion between resin cements and zirconia ceramics using a four-point bending test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
100 pairs of zirconium bar specimens were prepared with dimensions of 25 mm × 2 mm × 5 mm and cementation surfaces of 5 mm × 2 mm. The samples were divided into 5 groups of 20 pairs each. The groups are as follows: Group I (C) - Control with no surface modification, Group II (APA) - airborne-particle-abrasion with 110 µm high-purity aluminum oxide (Al2O3) particles, Group III (ROC) - airborne-particle-abrasion with 110 µm silica modified aluminum oxide (Alâ‚‚O₃ + SiO2) particles, Group IV (TCS) - tribochemical silica coated with Al2O3 particles, and Group V (AlC) - nano alumina coating. The surface modifications were assessed on two samples selected from each group by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The samples were cemented with two different self-adhesive resin cements. The bending bond strength was evaluated by mechanical testing.
RESULTS
According to the ANOVA results, surface treatments, different cement types, and their interactions were statistically significant (P < .05). The highest flexural bond strengths were obtained in nanostructured alumina coated zirconia surfaces (50.4 MPa) and the lowest values were obtained in the control group (12.00 MPa), both of which were cemented using a self-adhesive resin cement.
CONCLUSION
The surface modifications tested in the current study affected the surface roughness and flexural bond strength of zirconia. The nano alumina coating method significantly increased the flexural bond strength of zirconia ceramics.

Keyword

Surface modification; Zirconia; Nano-structured alumina coating; Four-point bending

MeSH Terms

Aluminum Oxide*
Cementation
Ceramics
In Vitro Techniques
Methods
Microscopy, Atomic Force
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Resin Cements*
Silicon Dioxide
Zirconium
Aluminum Oxide
Resin Cements
Silicon Dioxide
Zirconium

Figure

  • Fig. 1 SEM images of zirconia samples after surface treatments.(×10,000, bar 10 µm): (A) airborne-particle abrasion with 110 µm aluminum oxide particles (B) airborne-particle abrasion with 110 µm silica-modified aluminum oxide particles (C) airborne-particle abrasion with 30 µm silica-coated aluminum oxide particles (D) nano-structured alumina coating.

  • Fig. 2 AFM images of zirconia samples after different surface treatments. (A) airborne-particle abrasion with 110 µm aluminum oxide particles (B) airborne-particle abrasion with 110 µm silica-modified aluminum oxide particles (C) airborne-particle abrasion with 30 µm silicacoated aluminum oxide particles (D) nano-structured alumina coating. Differences in zirconia surface texture were evident according to the conditioning treatment performed. A more retentive surface was evident coated with nano-structured alumina.


Reference

1. Zhang S, Kocjan A, Lehmann F, Kosmac T, Kern M. Influence of contamination on resin bond strength to nano-structured alumina-coated zirconia ceramic. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010; 118:396–403. PMID: 20662914.
Article
2. Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Braswell K, Stoner BR. Surface fluorination of zirconia: adhesive bond strength comparison to commercial primers. Dent Mater. 2012; 28:604–608. PMID: 22364644.
Article
3. Hjerppe J, Närhi TO, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Surface roughness and the flexural and bend strength of zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116:577–583. PMID: 27157604.
Article
4. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35:819–826. PMID: 17825465.
Article
5. Jevnikar P, Krnel K, Kocjan A, Funduk N, Kosmac T. The effect of nano-structured alumina coating on resin-bond strength to zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:688–696. PMID: 20381854.
Article
6. Şanlı S, Çömlekoğlu MD, Çömlekoğlu E, Sonugelen M, Pamir T, Darvell BW. Influence of surface treatment on the resin-bonding of zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:657–668. PMID: 25862408.
Article
7. Cheung GJ, Botelho MG. Zirconia surface treatments for resin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17:551–558. PMID: 26734680.
8. Tanış MÇ, Akay C, Karakış D. Resin cementation of zirconia ceramics with different bonding agents. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015; 29:363–367. PMID: 26019653.
Article
9. Akay C, Çakırbay Tanış M, Şen M. Effects of hot chemical etching and 10-metacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer on the bond strength of zirconia ceramics to resinbased cements. J Prosthodont. 2016; Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Article
10. Casucci A, Osorio E, Osorio R, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M. Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia frameworks. J Dent. 2009; 37:891–897. PMID: 19616882.
Article
11. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater. 2009; 25:172–179. PMID: 18620746.
Article
12. Ozcan M, Kerkdijk S, Valandro LF. Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic following manufacturers' instructions of the cements only. Clin Oral Investig. 2008; 12:279–282.
13. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:430–436. PMID: 16765155.
Article
14. Menani LR, Farhat IA, Tiossi R, Ribeiro RF, Guastaldi AC. Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength between yttria partially stabilized zirconia ceramics and resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:357–364. PMID: 24529839.
Article
15. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:650–658. PMID: 20427080.
Article
16. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011; 27:71–82. PMID: 21094526.
Article
17. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:45–50. PMID: 16427692.
Article
18. Song HY, Yi YJ, Cho LR, Park DY. Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:347–353. PMID: 14564289.
Article
19. Carter CB, Norton MG. Ceramic materials: science and engineering. Springer;2007. p. 297–298.
20. Jones DW, Jones PA, Wilson HJ. The relationship between transverse strength and testing methods for dental ceramics. J Dent. 1972; 1:85–91. PMID: 4513718.
Article
21. ASTM International. Designation: C1674-11. Standard testmethod for flexural strength of advanced ceramics withengineered porosity (Honeycomb Cellular Channels) atambient temperatures. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International;2011.
22. Inokoshi M, Zhang F, Vanmeensel K, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Naert I, Vleugels J, Van Meerbeek B. Residual compressive surface stress increases the bending strength of dental zirconia. Dent Mater. 2017; 33:e147–e154. PMID: 28077209.
Article
23. Srikanth R, Kosmac T, Della Bona A, Yin L, Zhang Y. Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:435–442. PMID: 25687628.
Article
24. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38:745–753. PMID: 17873981.
25. Dias de Souza GM, Thompson VP, Braga RR. Effect of metal primers on microtensile bond strength between zirconia and resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105:296–303. PMID: 21530754.
Article
26. Casucci A, Osorio E, Osorio R, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M. Influence of different surface treatments on surface zirconia frameworks. J Dent. 2009; 37:891–897. PMID: 19616882.
Article
27. Placido E, Meira JB, Lima RG, Muench A, de Souza RM, Ballester RY. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1086–1092. PMID: 17123595.
Article
28. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27:849–855. PMID: 19241695.
29. Jin J, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Effect of test method on flexural strength of recent dental ceramics. Dent Mater J. 2004; 23:490–496. PMID: 15688709.
Article
30. Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990; 69:1791–1799. PMID: 2250083.
Article
31. Kim DW, Lee JJ, Kim KA, Seo JM. Influence of nano-structured alumina coating treatment on shear bond strength between zirconia ceramic and resin cement. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2016; 54:354–363.
Article
32. Ozcan M, Melo RM, Souza RO, Machado JP, Felipe Valandro L, Botttino MA. Effect of air-particle abrasion protocols on the biaxial flexural strength, surface characteristics and phase transformation of zirconia after cyclic loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013; 20:19–28. PMID: 23455160.
33. Scherrer SS, Cattani-Lorente M, Vittecoq E, de Mestral F, Griggs JA, Wiskott HW. Fatigue behavior in water of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics after abrasion with 30 µm silica-coated alumina particles. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:e28–e42. PMID: 21056462.
34. Qeblawi DM, Muñoz CA, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr. The effect of zirconia surface treatment on flexural strength and shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103:210–220. PMID: 20362764.
Article
35. Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo Cdos R, Bonachela WC. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:224–229. PMID: 16543020.
Article
36. Fonseca RG, Abi-Rached Fde O, da Silva FS, Henriques BA, Pinelli LA. Effect of surface and heat treatments on the biaxial flexural strength and phase transformation of a Y-TZP ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16:451–458. PMID: 25191667.
37. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Factors affecting the mechanical behavior of Y-TZP. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 37:78–87. PMID: 24887645.
Article
38. Silva GAF, da Luz EC, dos Reis Goyata F, da Silva Concilio LR, Neves ACC, Vitti RP, Cunha LG. Influence of surface treatments on topography and bond strength of densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Ceramics Int. 2016; 42:8136–8139.
Article
39. Valandro LF, Della Bona A, Antonio Bottino M, Neisser MP. The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:253–259. PMID: 15775926.
Article
40. Inan O, Acar A, Halkaci S. Effects of sandblasting and electrical discharge machining on porcelain adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 78:393–400. PMID: 16447164.
Full Text Links
  • JAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr