J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2018 Jan;61(1):51-59. 10.3340/jkns.2017.0209.

Complications Following Transradial Cerebral Angiography : An Ultrasound Follow-Up Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Focused Training Center for Trauma, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Cerebrovascular Skull Base Surgery, Mischer Neuroscience Institute, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
  • 4Department of Neurosurgery, St. Paul’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • 6Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • 7Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. nvkumc@gmail.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The feasibility and usefulness of transradial catheterization for coronary and neuro-intervention are well known. However, the anatomical change in the catheterized radial artery (RA) is not well understood. Herein, we present the results of ultrasonographic observation of the RA after routine transradial cerebral angiography (TRCA).
METHODS
Patients who underwent routine TRCA with pre- and post-procedure Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) of the catheterized RA were enrolled. We then recorded and retrospectively reviewed the diameter and any complicated features of the RA observed on DUS, and the factors associated with the diameter and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 223 TRCAs across 181 patients were enrolled in the current study. The mean RA diameter was 2.48 mm and was positively correlated with male gender (p < 0.001) and hypertension (p < 0.002). The median change in diameter after TRCA was less than 0.1 mm (range, -1.3 to 1.2 mm) and 90% of changes were between -0.8 and +0.7 mm. Across 228 procedures, there were 12 cases (5.3%) of intimal hyperplasia and 22 cases (9.6%) of asymptomatic local vascular complications found on DUS. Patients with abnormal findings on the first procedure had a smaller pre-procedural RA diameter than that of patients without findings (2.26 vs. 2.53 mm, p=0.0028). There was no significant difference in the incidence of abnormal findings for the first versus subsequent procedures (p=0.68).
CONCLUSION
DUS identified the pre- and post-procedural diameter and local complications of RA. Routine TRCA seems to be acceptable with regard to identifying local complications and changes in RA diameter.

Keyword

Cerebral Angiography; Radial Artery; Ultrasonography

MeSH Terms

Catheterization
Catheters
Cerebral Angiography*
Follow-Up Studies*
Humans
Hyperplasia
Hypertension
Incidence
Male
Radial Artery
Retrospective Studies
Ultrasonography*
Ultrasonography, Doppler

Figure

  • Fig. 1. A case of radial artery occlusion. A : This shows a pre-procedural normal radial artery with an intact lumen and vessel wall. B : This is the normal Doppler wave-form of the ulnar artery at the post-procedure follow-up. C : In contrast to (A) and (B), there is vague echogenicity in the lumen, which is assumed to indicate thrombus formation. D : The Doppler shows an obstructive wave pattern.

  • Fig. 2. Doppler ultrasonographic findings of various complications. A and B : A dissection of a radial artery in cross-sectional and longitudinal view. Note the double lumen sign. In the Doppler image that is not shown in this figure, the false lumen did not have any blood flow signal. C : An aneurysmal change in the radial artery around the puncture site (asterisk). D and E : A pseudoaneurysm case in Doppler and gray scale images. The pseudoaneurysm sac does not appear to have a proper wall and shows mixed Doppler signals due to the turbulent blood flow. F : A case of arteriovenous fistula.


Reference

References

1. Babunashvili A, Dundua D. Recanalization and reuse of early occluded radial artery within 6 days after previous transradial diagnostic procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 77:530–536. 2011.
Article
2. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, Simard S, Larivière MM. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J. 147:489–493. 2004.
Article
3. Benit E, Vranckx P, Jaspers L, Jackmaert R, Poelmans C, Coninx R. Frequency of a positive modified Allen's test in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 38:352–354. 1996.
Article
4. Bertrand B, Sene Y, Huygue O, Monsegu J. Doppler ultrasound imaging of the radial artery after catheterization. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 52:135–138. 2003.
5. Bertrand OF, Carey PC, Gilchrist IC. Allen or no Allen: that is the question! J Am Coll Cardiol. 63:1842–1844. 2014.
6. Bertrand OF, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rodés-Cabau J, Larose E, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 3:1022–1031. 2010.
7. Buturak A, Gorgulu S, Norgaz T, Voyvoda N, Sahingoz Y, Degirmencioglu A, et al. The long-term incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure. Cardiol J. 21:350–356. 2014.
Article
8. Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 109(23 Suppl 1):III27–III32. 2004.
Article
9. Eker HE, Tuzuner A, Yilmaz AA, Alanoglu Z, Ates Y. The impact of two arterial catheters, different in diameter and length, on postcannulation radial artery diameter, blood flow, and occlusion in atherosclerotic patients. J Anesth. 23:347–352. 2009.
Article
10. Fang HY, Chung SY, Sun CK, Youssef AA, Bhasin A, Tsai TH, et al. Transradial and transbrachial arterial approach for simultaneous carotid angiographic examination and stenting using catheter looping and retrograde engagement technique. Ann Vasc Surg. 24:670–679. 2010.
Article
11. Feray H, Izgi C, Cetiner D, Men EE, Saltan Y, Baltay A, et al. Effectiveness of enoxaparin for prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial cardiac catheterization. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 29:322–325. 2010.
Article
12. Jo KW, Park SM, Kim SD, Kim SR, Baik MW, Kim YW. Is transradial cerebral angiography feasible and safe? A single center's experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 47:332–337. 2010.
Article
13. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 377:1409–1420. 2011.
Article
14. Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, Asif N, Almoghairi AM, Choudhury A, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the Good Radial Artery Size Prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol. 30:211–216. 2014.
Article
15. Koutouzis M, Matejka G, Olivecrona G, Grip L, Albertsson P. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 11:79–83. 2010.
Article
16. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, Bendok BR, Ringer AJ, Kim SH, et al. Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery. 51:335–340. discussion 340-332. 2002.
Article
17. Lopes FG, Bottino DA, Oliveira FJ, Mecenas AS, Clapauch R, Bouskela E. In elderly women moderate hypercholesterolemia is associated to endothelial and microcirculatory impairments. Microvasc Res. 85:99–103. 2013.
Article
18. Matsumoto Y, Hongo K, Toriyama T, Nagashima H, Kobayashi S. Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 22:704–708. 2001.
19. Nohara AM, Kallmes DF. Transradial cerebral angiography: technique and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 24:1247–1250. 2003.
20. Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 72:335–340. 2008.
Article
21. Pancholy SB. Impact of two different hemostatic devices on radial artery outcomes after transradial catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol. 21:101–104. 2009.
22. Pancholy SB. Strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion after transradial PCI. Curr Cardiol Rep. 16:505. 2014.
Article
23. Pancholy SB, Patel TM. Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial access. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 79:78–81. 2012.
Article
24. Patel T, Shah S, Malhotra H, Radadia R, Shah L. Transradial approach for stenting of vertebrobasilar stenosis: a feasibility study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 74:925–931. 2009.
Article
25. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 60:2481–2489. 2012.
Article
26. Slawin J, Kubler P, Szczepański A, Piatek J, Stepkowski M, Reczuch K. Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 9:353–361. 2013.
27. Stegemann E, Sansone R, Stegemann B, Kelm M, Heiss C. Validation of high-resolution ultrasound measurements of intima-media thickness of the radial artery for the assessment of structural remodeling. Angiology. 66:574–577. 2014.
Article
28. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 40:156–158. 1997.
Article
29. Tuncez A, Kaya Z, Aras D, Yildiz A, Gül EE, Tekinalp M, et al. Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion associated transradial catheterization. Int J Med Sci. 10:1715–1719. 2013.
Article
30. Uhlemann M, Möbius-Winkler S, Mende M, Eitel I, Fuernau G, Sandri M, et al. The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 5:36–43. 2012.
Article
31. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Penzo C, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Ferrari R, et al. Transradial coronary catheterization and intervention across the whole spectrum of Allen test results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63:1833–1841. 2014.
Article
32. Wakeyama T, Ogawa H, Iida H, Takaki A, Iwami T, Mochizuki M, et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 41:1109–1114. 2003.
Article
33. Wu CJ, Hung WC, Chen SM, Yang CH, Chen CJ, Cheng CI, et al. Feasibility and safety of transradial artery approach for selective cerebral angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 66:21–26. 2005.
Article
34. Yan Z, Zhou Y, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Yang S, Wang Z. Impact of transradial coronary procedures on radial artery function. Angiology. 65:104–107. 2014.
Article
35. Yip HK, Youssef AA, Chang WN, Lu CH, Yang CH, Chen SM, et al. Feasibility and safety of transradial arterial approach for simultaneous right and left vertebral artery angiographic studies and stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 30:840–846. 2007.
Article
36. Zankl AR, Andrassy M, Volz C, Ivandic B, Krumsdorf U, Katus HA, et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clin Res Cardiol. 99:841–847. 2010.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr