Kosin Med J.  2017 Dec;32(2):204-211. 10.7180/kmj.2017.32.2.204.

Influence of Orthokeratology Lens on Axial length Elongation and Myopic Progression in Childhood Myopia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Maryknoll Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. jiel75@hanmail.net

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
To investigate the clinical effects of orthokeratology lens wear on inhibition of the myopic progression and axial length elongation in Korean children with myopia.
METHODS
The authors reviewed out-patient records of 37 eyes of 19 patients wearing orthokeratology lenses. The 46 eyes of 23 patients wearing spectacles were included into the control group. We evaluated the relationship between orthokeratology lens wear and control group according to age, initial myopia, initial astigmatism, axial length elongation.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences between two groups as for age, initial myopia, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, and axial length at baseline (t-test, P > 0.05). Significant reduction of refraction was shown in patients with wearing lenses after 1 year (t-test, P < 0.001). The mean axial length before and after 1 year was 24.62 ± 1.39 mm and 24.73 ± 1.28 mm respectively after lens wearing, and 24.59 ± 0.74 mm and 24.80 ± 0.71 mm respectively after wearing glasses. The axial length elongation was 0.11 ± 0.12 mm, and 0.21 ± 0.07 mm in patients with wearing lenses and glasses, respectively, which showed statistically significant difference (t-test, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
The orthokeratology lens was found to be effective in suppression of myopic progression through less axial length elongation, compared with the glasses.

Keyword

Axial length; Myopia; Orthokeratology

MeSH Terms

Astigmatism
Child
Eyeglasses
Glass
Humans
Myopia*
Outpatients

Reference

1. Foster PJ, Jiang Y. Epidemiology of myopia. Eye (Lond). 2014; 28:202–208.
Article
2. Fledelius HC. Is myopia getting more frequent? A cross-sectional study of 1416 Danes aged 16 years+. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1983; 61:545–559.
Article
3. Kim JC, Koo BS. A study of prevailing features and causes of myopia and visual impairment in urban school children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1988; 29:165–181.
4. Han ER, Kang JE, Jun RM, Choi KR. Changes of refractive errors and optometric values in fourth graders at an urban elementary school in Korea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:1119–1125.
Article
5. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Lee LA, Hung PT. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence and severity of myopia among schoolchildren in Taiwan in 2000. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001; 100:684–691.
6. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005; 25:381–391.
Article
7. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012; 379:1739–1748.
Article
8. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Au Eong KG, Tan DT. Myopia: attempts to arrest progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86:1306–1311.
Article
9. Lee JJ, Fang PC, Yang IH, Chen CH, Lin PW, Lin SA, et al. Prevention of myopia progression with 0.05% atropine solution. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 22:41–46.
Article
10. Tan DT, Lam DS, Chua WH, Shu-Ping DF, Crockett RS. Asian Pirenzepine Study Group. One-year multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:84–91.
Article
11. Jensen H. Timolol maleate in the control of myopia. A preliminary report. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1988; 185:128–129.
Article
12. Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ, Chang CW, Hung PT, Lin LL. An intervention trial on efficacy of atropine and multi-focal glasses in controlling myopic progression. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001; 79:233–236.
Article
13. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. A randomized trial of the effects of rigid contact lenses on myopia progression. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:1760–1766.
Article
14. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology--a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res. 2004; 28:121–127.
Article
15. Carney LG. The basis for corneal shape change during contact lens wear. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1975; 52:445–454.
Article
16. Dave T, Ruston D. Current trends in modern orthokeratology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998; 18:224–233.
Article
17. Cho P, Cheung SW, Edwards M. The longitudinal orthokeratology research in children (LORIC) in Hong Kong: a pilot study on refractive changes and myopic control. Curr Eye Res. 2005; 30:71–80.
Article
18. Swarbrick HA, Alharbi A, Watt K, Lum E, Kang P. Myopia control during orthokeratology lens wear in children using a novel study design. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:620–630.
Article
19. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:1181–1185.
Article
20. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77:252–259.
Article
21. Jee DH, Hong ME, Kim MS. The efficacy and safety of Ortho-K LK(TM) Lens. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:706–711.
22. Shin DB, Yang KM, Lee SB, Kim MK, Lee JL. Effect of reverse geometry lens on correction of moderate-degree myopia and cornea. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:1748–1756.
23. Chang JW, Choi TH, Lee HB. The efficacy and safety of reverse geometry lenses. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:908–912.
24. Lam CS, Edwards M, Millodot M, Goh WS. A 2-year longitunidal study of myopia progression and optical component changes among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 1999; 76:370–380.
25. Kakita T, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Influence of overnight orthokeratology on axial elongation in childhood myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:2170–2174.
Article
26. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr. Animal models of emmetropization: matching axial length to the focal plane. J Am Optom Assoc. 1995; 66:405–414.
27. Smith EL 3rd, Kee CS, Ramamirtham R, Qiao-Grider Y, Hung LF. Peripheral vision can influence eye growth and refractive development in infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:3965–3972.
Article
28. Huang J, Hung LF, Ramamirtham R, Blasdel TL, Humbird TL, Bockhorst KH, et al. Effects of form deprivation on peripheral refractions and ocular shape in infant rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:4033–4044.
Article
29. Knight-Nanan DM, O'Keefe M. Refractive outcome in eyes with retinopathy of prematurity treated with cryotherapy or diode laser:3 year follow up. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:998–1001.
Article
30. Mathur A, Atchison DA. Effect of orthokeratology on peripheral aberrations of the eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86:E476–E484.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr