Korean J Ophthalmol.  2017 Dec;31(6):489-496. 10.3341/kjo.2016.0107.

Comparison of Contact Lens Corrected Quality of Vision and Life of Keratoconus and Myopic Patients

• Lee S
• Jung G
• Lee HK

• KMID: 2396699
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.0107

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare and analyze changes in vision quality, subjective symptoms, and psycho-social satisfaction in keratoconus and myopic patients following the wearing of contact lenses.
METHODS
This study enrolled 25 keratoconus and 25 myopic patients with corrected vision over 0.8 according to the Snellen chart due to treatment with contact lenses. Patients were surveyed prior to the wearing of contact lenses, and again after three months of contact lens usage with a questionnaire about quality of vision and life. The changes in visual function, visual symptoms, and psycho-social well-being before and after contact lens usage were analyzed.
RESULTS
The keratoconus patients' overall degree of satisfaction was higher than the overall degree of satisfaction of myopic patients, and the motivation for contact lens usage and purpose of contact lens treatment were different in the two groups. Keratoconus patients experienced greater changes in satisfaction, particularly in satisfaction during night activities, short-distance work, and the reading of fine print. Furthermore, they experienced fewer dry eye symptoms but greater foreign body sensations than patients with myopia following treatment with contact lenses. No statistically significant differences in social role functions existed between the two groups. Keratoconus patients had a lower expectation of visual acuity recovery before treatment with contact lenses (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.049) compared to myopic patients, and more anxiety about vision loss following treatment (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.018) compared to their level of anxiety about vision loss before treatment with contact lenses.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the same treatment was applied, keratoconus and myopic patients experienced different types of discomfort and areas of improvement in contact lens corrected vision. Therefore, not only corrected vision, but also subsequent improvement and discomfort outcomes should be considered by patients when choosing contact lens treatment. For patients with mild keratoconus, contact lens treatment may be an efficacious first treatment modality.

Keyword

Contact lenses; Keratoconus; Myopia; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire; Vision quality

MeSH Terms

Anxiety
Contact Lenses
Foreign Bodies
Humans
Keratoconus*
Motivation
Myopia
Sensation
Visual Acuity

Reference

1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998; 42:297–319.

2. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984; 28:293–322.

3. Szczotka LB, Rabinowitz YS, Yang H. Influence of contact lens wear on the corneal topography of keratoconus. CLAO J. 1996; 22:270–273.

4. Shin DB, Han NS, Kim MK, et al. Effect of the aspheric RGP lens on corneal topography and endothelial cell in keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:396–404.

5. Yang KM, Kim MK, Lee JL, Kim CS. Effect of the spheric multi-curve lens on changes of corneal topography and endothelial cell in keratoconus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1427–1437.

6. Lee J, Lee J, Park K, et al. Impact of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatment on quality of life in myopia patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:2591–2606.

7. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:227–233.

8. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, et al. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:1496–1504.

9. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. The VF-14: an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:630–638.

10. Lee SW, Choi TH, Lee HB. Comparison of wavefront guided customized ablation vs. conventional ablation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:2607–2614.

11. Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, et al. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:527–535.

12. Erdurmus M, Yildiz EH, Abdalla YF, et al. Contact lens related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2009; 35:123–127.

13. Zadnik K, Mannis MJ, Johnson CA, Rich D. Rapid contrast sensitivity assessment in keratoconus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987; 64:693–697.

14. Dogru M, Karakaya H, Ozcetin H, et al. Tear function and ocular surface changes in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1110–1118.