J Clin Neurol.  2017 Oct;13(4):317-324. 10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317.

Apraxia: Review and Update

• Park JE

• KMID: 2392126
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2017.13.4.317

Abstract

Praxis, the ability to perform skilled or learned movements is essential for daily living. Inability to perform such praxis movements is defined as apraxia. Apraxia can be further classified into subtypes such as ideomotor, ideational and limb-kinetic apraxia. Relevant brain regions have been found to include the motor, premotor, temporal and parietal cortices. Apraxia is found in a variety of highly prevalent neurological disorders including dementia, stroke and Parkinsonism. Furthermore, apraxia has been shown to negatively affect quality of life. Therefore, recognition and treatment of this disorder is critical. This article provides an overview of apraxia and highlights studies dealing with the neurophysiology of this disorder, opening up novel perspectives for the use of motor training and noninvasive brain stimulation as treatment.

Keyword

apraxia; ideomotor; ideational; limb-kinetic; neurophysiology; Parkinsonism; dementia; stroke

MeSH Terms

Apraxias*
Brain
Dementia
Nervous System Diseases
Neurophysiology
Parietal Lobe
Parkinsonian Disorders
Quality of Life
Stroke

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Reproduction of Liepmann's schema of the motor engram. Adapted from Roby-Brami et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012;367:144-160, with permission of Royal Society Publishing.2 1: limb-kinetic apraxia, 2: ideomotor apraxia, 3: ideational apraxia, Co.: precentral gyrus, Cp: postcentral gyrus, F. inf.: frontal lobe, inferior, F. med.: frontal lobe, middle, F. sup.: frontal lobe, superior, G.sm.: supramarginal gyrus, O.m.: occipital lobe, medial, O.s.: occipital lobe, superior.

• 

  Fig. 2 Spatial plots for simple movement (A) and tool use movement (B). The beginning of the Bereitschaftspotentials (BPs), or movement-related cortical potentials, are seen to occur in bilateral sensorimotor areas in simple movement, while it is seen to begin in the left parietal area in tool pantomime. Adapted from Wheaton et al. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005;116:1382-1390, with permission of Springer.49

• 

  Fig. 3 Study design of tDCS in patients with corticobasal syndrome. The study was conducted in a randomized, double-blind fashion. All patients were randomly subjected to three types of stimulation over two sessions. A: tDCS of the left parietal cortex, right parietal cortex and placebo tDCS. B: The De Renzi ideomotor apraxia test was conducted to assess limb apraxia prior to and following each stimulation session. Adapted from Bianchi et al. European Journal of Neurology 2015;22: 1317-1322, with permission of Wiley.71 tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation, PARC: parietal cortex.

Reference

1. Gross RG, Grossman M. Update on apraxia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008; 8:490–496.

2. Roby-Brami A, Hermsdörfer J, Roy AC, Jacobs S. A neuropsychological perspective on the link between language and praxis in modern humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367:144–160.

3. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. Brain. 1965; 88:585–644.

4. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. Brain. 1965; 88:237–294.

5. Heilman KM, Rothi LJ, Valenstein E. Two forms of ideomotor apraxia. Neurology. 1982; 32:342–346.

6. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle K, Grossman M, Coslett HB. Left inferior parietal representations for skilled hand-object interactions: evidence from stroke and corticobasal degeneration. Cortex. 2007; 43:411–423.

7. Buxbaum LJ. Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action. Neurocase. 2001; 7:445–458.

8. Heilman KM. Apraxia. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2010; 16:86–98.

9. Foki T, Vanbellingen T, Lungu C, Pirker W, Bohlhalter S, Nyffeler T, et al. Limb-kinetic apraxia affects activities of daily living in Parkinson's disease: a multi-center study. Eur J Neurol. 2016; 23:1301–1307.

10. Mendoza JE, Apostolos GT, Humphreys JD, Hanna-Pladdy B, O'Bryant SE. Coin rotation task (CRT): a new test of motor dexterity. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24:287–292.

11. Gálvez-Jiménez N, Tuite PJ. Uncommon causes of movement disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2011.

12. Tyrrell PJ. Apraxia of gait or higher level gait disorders: review and description of two cases of progressive gait disturbance due to frontal lobe degeneration. J R Soc Med. 1994; 87:454–456.

13. Zadikoff C, Lang AE. Apraxia in movement disorders. Brain. 2005; 128:1480–1497.

14. Donkervoort M, Dekker J, van den Ende F, Stehmann-Saris JC, Deelman BG. Prevalence of apraxia among patients with a first left hemisphere stroke in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clin Rehabil. 2000; 14:130–136.

15. Wheaton LA, Hallett M. Ideomotor apraxia: a review. J Neurol Sci. 2007; 260:1–10.

16. Hanna-Pladdy B, Daniels SK, Fieselman MA, Thompson K, Vasterling JJ, Heilman KM, et al. Praxis lateralization: errors in right and left hemisphere stroke. Cortex. 2001; 37:219–230.

17. Burrell JR, Hornberger M, Vucic S, Kiernan MC, Hodges JR. Apraxia and motor dysfunction in corticobasal syndrome. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e92944.

18. Goldenberg G. Apraxia. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013; 4:453–462.

19. De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol. 1980; 37:6–10.

20. Vanbellingen T, Kersten B, Van Hemelrijk B, Van de Winckel A, Bertschi M, Müri R, et al. Comprehensive assessment of gesture production: a new test of upper limb apraxia (TULIA). Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17:59–66.

21. Roy EA, Square-Storer P, Hogg S, Adams S. Analysis of task demands in apraxia. Int J Neurosci. 1991; 56:177–186.

22. Foundas AL, Macauley BL, Raymer AM, Maher LM, Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Ideomotor apraxia in Alzheimer disease and left hemisphere stroke: limb transitive and intransitive movements. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1999; 12:161–166.

23. Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning hand-object interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43:917–929.

24. Buxbaum LJ, Shapiro AD, Coslett HB. Critical brain regions for toolrelated and imitative actions: a componential analysis. Brain. 2014; 137:1971–1985.

25. Baumard J, Lesourd M, Jarry C, Merck C, Etcharry-Bouyx F, Chauviré V, et al. Tool use disorders in neurodegenerative diseases: roles of semantic memory and technical reasoning. Cortex. 2016; 82:119–132.

26. Jarry C, Osiurak F, Besnard J, Baumard J, Lesourd M, Croisile B, et al. Tool use in left brain damage and Alzheimer's disease: what about function and manipulation knowledge? J Neuropsychol. 2016; 10:154–159.

27. Lesourd M, Le Gall D, Baumard J, Croisile B, Jarry C, Osiurak F. Apraxia and Alzheimer's disease: review and perspectives. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013; 23:234–256.

28. Ochipa C, Rothi LJ, Heilman KM. Conceptual apraxia in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 1992; 115:1061–1071.

29. Tranel D, Kemmerer D, Adolphs R, Damasio H, Damasio AR. Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003; 20:409–432.

30. Choi SH, Na DL, Kang E, Lee KM, Lee SW, Na DG. Functional magnetic resonance imaging during pantomiming tool-use gestures. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 139:311–317.

31. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron. 2002; 34:149–159.

32. Chao LL, Haxby JV, Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2:913–919.

33. Frey SH. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex. 2007; 43:368–375.

34. Ebisch SJ, Babiloni C, Del Gratta C, Ferretti A, Perrucci MG, Caulo M, et al. Human neural systems for conceptual knowledge of proper object use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Cereb Cortex. 2007; 17:2744–2751.

35. Canessa N, Borgo F, Cappa SF, Perani D, Falini A, Buccino G, et al. The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18:740–751.

36. Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Tool responsive regions in the posterior parietal cortex: effect of differences in motor goal and target object during imagined transitive movements. Neuroimage. 2009; 47:1832–1843.

37. Watson CE, Buxbaum LJ. A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions. Cortex. 2015; 65:65–82.

38. Ogawa K, Imai F. Hand-independent representation of tool-use pantomimes in the left anterior intraparietal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234:3677–3687.

39. Assmus A, Marshall JC, Ritzl A, Noth J, Zilles K, Fink GR. Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments. Neuroimage. 2003; 20:Suppl 1. S82–S88.

40. Bohlhalter S, Hattori N, Wheaton L, Fridman E, Shamim EA, Garraux G, et al. Gesture subtype-dependent left lateralization of praxis planning: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19:1256–1262.

41. Fridman EA, Immisch I, Hanakawa T, Bohlhalter S, Waldvogel D, Kansaku K, et al. The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production. Neuroimage. 2006; 29:417–428.

42. Ramayya AG, Glasser MF, Rilling JK. A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 20:507–516.

43. Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Rick T, von Kapri A, Kuhlen T, Huang R, et al. Probabilistic fibre tract analysis of cytoarchitectonically defined human inferior parietal lobule areas reveals similarities to macaques. Neuroimage. 2011; 58:362–380.

44. Wheaton LA, Yakota S, Hallett M. Posterior parietal negativity preceding self-paced praxis movements. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 163:535–539.

45. Wheaton LA, Shibasaki H, Hallett M. Temporal activation pattern of parietal and premotor areas related to praxis movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116:1201–1212.

46. Freund HJ, Hummelsheim H. Lesions of premotor cortex in man. Brain. 1985; 108:697–733.

47. Davare M, Andres M, Cosnard G, Thonnard JL, Olivier E. Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:2260–2268.

48. Davare M, Lemon R, Olivier E. Selective modulation of interactions between ventral premotor cortex and primary motor cortex during precision grasping in humans. J Physiol. 2008; 586:2735–2742.

49. Wheaton LA, Nolte G, Bohlhalter S, Fridman E, Hallett M. Synchronization of parietal and premotor areas during preparation and execution of praxis hand movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116:1382–1390.

50. Pobric G, Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA. Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Curr Biol. 2010; 20:964–968.

51. Patterson K, Nestor PJ, Rogers TT. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007; 8:976–987.

52. Lambon Ralph MA, Sage K, Jones RW, Mayberry EJ. Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107:2717–2722.

53. Adlam AL, Bozeat S, Arnold R, Watson P, Hodges JR. Semantic knowledge in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease. Cortex. 2006; 42:675–684.

54. Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Garrard P, Hodges JR. Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia. 2000; 38:1207–1215.

55. Soliveri , Piacentini S, Girotti F. Limb apraxia in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 2005; 64:448–453.

56. Soliveri P, Piacentini S, Paridi D, Testa D, Carella F, Girotti F. Distalproximal differences in limb apraxia in corticobasal degeneration but not progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurol Sci. 2003; 24:213–214.

57. Foki T, Pirker W, Geißler A, Haubenberger D, Hilbert M, Hoellinger I, et al. Finger dexterity deficits in Parkinson's disease and somatosensory cortical dysfunction. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015; 21:259–265.

58. Matt E, Foki T, Fischmeister F, Pirker W, Haubenberger D, Rath J, et al. Early dysfunctions of fronto-parietal praxis networks in Parkinson's disease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017; 11:512–525.

59. Denes G, Mantovan MC, Gallana A, Cappelletti JY. Limb-kinetic apraxia. Mov Disord. 1998; 13:468–476.

60. Smania N, Aglioti SM, Girardi F, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Cosentino A, et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves daily life activities in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2006; 67:2050–2052.

61. Smania N, Girardi F, Domenicali C, Lora E, Aglioti S. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: a study in left-brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:379–388.

62. Daumüller M, Goldenberg G. Therapy to improve gestural expression in aphasia: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24:55–65.

63. Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014; 125:2150–2206.

64. Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 128:56–92.

65. Wischnewski M, Schutter DJ. Efficacy and time course of theta burst stimulation in healthy humans. Brain Stimul. 2015; 8:685–692.

66. Wischnewski M, Schutter DJ. Efficacy and time course of paired associative stimulation in cortical plasticity: implications for neuropsychiatry. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 127:732–739.

67. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron. 2007; 55:187–199.

68. Nguyen JP, Suarez A, Kemoun G, Meignier M, Le Saout E, Damier P, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurophysiol Clin. 2017; 47:47–53.

69. Zhao J, Li Z, Cong Y, Zhang J, Tan M, Zhang H, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves cognitive function of Alzheimer's disease patients. Oncotarget. 2017; 8:33864–33871.

70. Lee J, Choi BH, Oh E, Sohn EH, Lee AY. Treatment of Alzheimer's disease with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Neurol. 2016; 12:57–64.

71. Bianchi M, Cosseddu M, Cotelli M, Manenti R, Brambilla M, Rizzetti MC, et al. Left parietal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation enhances gesture processing in corticobasal syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2015; 22:1317–1322.

72. Bolognini N, Convento S, Banco E, Mattioli F, Tesio L, Vallar G, et al. Improving ideomotor limb apraxia by electrical stimulation of the left posterior parietal cortex. Brain. 2015; 138:428–439.

73. Bieńkiewicz MM, Brandi ML, Goldenberg G, Hughes CM, Hermsdörfer J. The tool in the brain: apraxia in ADL. Behavioral and neurological correlates of apraxia in daily living. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:353.

74. Hanna-Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: evidence from physical activities of daily living. Neurology. 2003; 60:487–490.