Clin Exp Vaccine Res.  2013 Jan;2(1):8-18.

Requirements for improved vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease epidemics

Affiliations
  • 1Animal, Plant, and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency, Anyang, Korea. parkjhvet@korea.kr

Abstract

Inactivated foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines are currently used worldwide. With the emergence of various FMD virus serotypes and subtypes, vaccines must become more suitable for field-based uses under the current circumstances in terms of the fast and proper selection of vaccine strains, an extended vaccine development period for new viruses, protecting against the risk of virus leakage during vaccine manufacture, counteracting the delayed onset of immune response, counteracting shorter durations of immunity, and the accurate serological differentiation of infected and vaccinated animals and multiple vaccination. The quality of vaccines should then be improved to effectively control FMD outbreaks and minimize the problems that can arise among livestock after vaccinations. Vaccine improvement should be based on using attenuated virus strains with high levels of safety. Moreover, when vaccines are urgently required for newly spread field strains, the seed viruses for new vaccines should be developed for only a short period. Improved vaccines should offer superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine. In addition, they should have highly protective effects without persistent infection. In this way, if vaccines are developed using new methods such as reverse genetics or vector vaccine technology, in which live viruses can be easily made by replacing specific protective antigens, even a single vaccination is likely to generate highly protective effects with an extended duration of immunity, and the safety and stability of the vaccines will be assured. We therefore reviewed the current FMD vaccines and their adjuvants, and evaluated if they provide superior immunization to all susceptible animals including cattle and swine.

Keyword

Foot-and-mouth disease; Vaccine; Development; Improvement

MeSH Terms

Animals
Cattle
Disease Outbreaks
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Immunization
Livestock
Reverse Genetics
Seeds
Swine
Vaccination
Vaccines
Viruses
Vaccines

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Antibody levels against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus O type in susceptible animals after FMD vaccination in the field without maternal-derived antibody during the 2010 to 2011 epidemic in Korea. (A) Antibody levels determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to viral structural proteins (SP-ELISA) after the first vaccination (or second vaccination). The second vaccination in case of pigs (tested 30-50 animals per week) were vaccinated 4 weeks after first vaccination. (B) Virus neutralizing (VN) reciprocal titers using the field strain (O/Andong/KOR/2010) two weeks after the second vaccination.

  • Fig. 2 Diminishment of the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks after vaccination during the 2010 to 2011 epidemic in Korea. The arrows show the onset of vaccination.


Reference

1. Bachrach HL. Foot-and-mouth disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1968. 22:201–244.
Article
2. Hedger RS, Taylor WP, Barnett IT, Riek R, Harpham D. Simultaneous vaccination of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease and rinderpest. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1986. 18:21–25.
Article
3. Yoon H, Yoon SS, Wee SH, Kim YJ, Kim B. Clinical manifestations of foot-and-mouth disease during the 2010/2011 epidemic in the Republic of Korea. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2012. 59:517–525.
Article
4. Dupuis L, Ascarateil S, Aucouturier J, Ganne V. SEPPIC vaccine adjuvants for poultry. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006. 1081:202–205.
Article
5. Cloete M, Dungu B, Van Staden LI, Ismail-Cassim N, Vosloo W. Evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the SAT serotypes. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2008. 75:17–31.
Article
6. McKercher PD, Graves JH. A review of the current status of oil adjuvants in foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Dev Biol Stand. 1976. 35:107–112.
7. Andersen AA, Campbell CH. Experimental placental transfer of foot-and-mouth disease virus in mice. Am J Vet Res. 1976. 37:585–589.
8. Mackenzie JS, Slade WR. Evidence for recombination between two different immunological types of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1975. 53:251–256.
Article
9. Knowles NJ, He J, Shang Y, et al. Southeast Asian foot-and-mouth disease viruses in Eastern Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012. 18:499–501.
Article
10. Parida S. Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus: strategies and effectiveness. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009. 8:347–365.
Article
11. Madhanmohan M, Nagendrakumar SB, Kumar R, et al. Clinical protection, sub-clinical infection and persistence following vaccination with extinction payloads of O1 Manisa foot-and-mouth disease monovalent vaccine and challenge in goats and comparison with sheep. Res Vet Sci. 2012. 93:1050–1059.
Article
12. Doel TR. Optimisation of the immune response to foot-and-mouth disease vaccines. Vaccine. 1999. 17:1767–1771.
Article
13. Doel TR. FMD vaccines. Virus Res. 2003. 91:81–99.
Article
14. Mowat GN, Barr DA, Bennett JH. The development of an attenuated foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine by modification and cloning in tissue cultures of BHK21 cells. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1969. 26:341–354.
Article
15. Polacino P, Kaplan G, Yafal AG, Palma EL. Biochemical characterization of a foot-and-mouth disease virus strain attenuated for cattle: brief report. Arch Virol. 1986. 88:143–150.
Article
16. Saiz M, Nunez JI, Jimenez-Clavero MA, Baranowski E, Sobrino F. Foot-and-mouth disease virus: biology and prospects for disease control. Microbes Infect. 2002. 4:1183–1192.
Article
17. Doel TR. Natural and vaccine-induced immunity to foot and mouth disease: the prospects for improved vaccines. Rev Sci Tech. 1996. 15:883–911.
Article
18. Aucouturier J, Dupuis L, Ganne V. Adjuvants designed for veterinary and human vaccines. Vaccine. 2001. 19:2666–2672.
Article
19. Barnett PV, Pullen L, Williams L, Doel TR. International bank for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine: assessment of Montanide ISA 25 and ISA 206, two commercially available oil adjuvants. Vaccine. 1996. 14:1187–1198.
Article
20. Yeruham I, Yadin H, Haymovich M, Perl S. Adverse reactions to FMD vaccine. Vet Dermatol. 2001. 12:197–201.
Article
21. McCullough KC, Sobrino F. Sobrino F, Domingo E, editors. Immunology of foot-and-mouth disease. Foot and mouth disease: current perspectives. 2004. Norfolk: Horizon Biosciences;173–222.
Article
22. Spath EJ, Smitsaart E, Casaro AP, et al. Immune response of calves to foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine emulsified with oil adjuvant: strategies of vaccination. Vaccine. 1995. 13:909–914.
Article
23. Mason PW, Piccone ME, McKenna TS, Chinsangaram J, Grubman MJ. Evaluation of a live-attenuated foot-and-mouth disease virus as a vaccine candidate. Virology. 1997. 227:96–102.
Article
24. Chinsangaram J, Mason PW, Grubman MJ. Protection of swine by live and inactivated vaccines prepared from a leader proteinase-deficient serotype A12 foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine. 1998. 16:1516–1522.
Article
25. Jamal SM, Ferrari G, Ahmed S, Normann P, Belsham GJ. Molecular characterization of serotype Asia-1 foot-and-mouth disease viruses in Pakistan and Afghanistan: emergence of a new genetic group and evidence for a novel recombinant virus. Infect Genet Evol. 2011. 11:2049–2062.
Article
26. Lee KN, Oem JK, Park JH, et al. Evidence of recombination in a new isolate of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1. Virus Res. 2009. 139:117–121.
Article
27. Lewis-Rogers N, McClellan DA, Crandall KA. The evolution of foot-and-mouth disease virus: impacts of recombination and selection. Infect Genet Evol. 2008. 8:786–798.
Article
28. Rodriguez LL, Gay CG. Development of vaccines toward the global control and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011. 10:377–387.
Article
29. Li P, Bai X, Sun P, et al. Evaluation of a genetically modified foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine candidate generated by reverse genetics. BMC Vet Res. 2012. 8:57.
Article
30. Li P, Bai X, Lu Z, et al. Construction of a full-length infectious cDNA clone of inter-genotypic chimeric foot-and-mouth disease virus. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2012. 52:114–119.
31. Pacheco JM, Piccone ME, Rieder E, Pauszek SJ, Borca MV, Rodriguez LL. Domain disruptions of individual 3B proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus do not alter growth in cell culture or virulence in cattle. Virology. 2010. 405:149–156.
Article
32. Uddowla S, Hollister J, Pacheco JM, Rodriguez LL, Rieder E. A safe foot-and-mouth disease vaccine platform with two negative markers for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals. J Virol. 2012. 86:11675–11685.
Article
33. Li S, Gao M, Zhang R, et al. A mutant of infectious Asia 1 serotype foot-and-mouth disease virus with the deletion of 10-amino-acid in the 3A protein. Virus Genes. 2010. 41:406–413.
Article
34. Piccone ME, Pacheco JM, Pauszek SJ, et al. The region between the two polyprotein initiation codons of foot-and-mouth disease virus is critical for virulence in cattle. Virology. 2010. 396:152–159.
Article
35. Li P, Bai X, Cao Y, et al. Expression and stability of foreign epitopes introduced into 3A nonstructural protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus. PLoS One. 2012. 7:e41486.
Article
36. de Avila Botton S, Brum MC, Bautista E, et al. Immunopotentiation of a foot-and-mouth disease virus subunit vaccine by interferon alpha. Vaccine. 2006. 24:3446–3456.
Article
37. Moraes MP, Chinsangaram J, Brum MC, Grubman MJ. Immediate protection of swine from foot-and-mouth disease: a combination of adenoviruses expressing interferon alpha and a foot-and-mouth disease virus subunit vaccine. Vaccine. 2003. 22:268–279.
Article
38. Martin-Acebes MA, Vazquez-Calvo A, Rincon V, Mateu MG, Sobrino F. A single amino acid substitution in the capsid of foot-and-mouth disease virus can increase acid resistance. J Virol. 2011. 85:2733–2740.
Article
39. Hegde NR, Maddur MS, Rao PP, Kaveri SV, Bayry J. Thermostable foot-and-mouth disease virus as a vaccine candidate for endemic countries: a perspective. Vaccine. 2009. 27:2199–2201.
Article
40. Zhu J, Weiss M, Grubman MJ, de los Santos T. Differential gene expression in bovine cells infected with wild type and leaderless foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virology. 2010. 404:32–40.
Article
41. Almeida MR, Rieder E, Chinsangaram J, et al. Construction and evaluation of an attenuated vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease: difficulty adapting the leader proteinase-deleted strategy to the serotype O1 virus. Virus Res. 1998. 55:49–60.
Article
42. Brown CC, Piccone ME, Mason PW, McKenna TS, Grubman MJ. Pathogenesis of wild-type and leaderless foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle. J Virol. 1996. 70:5638–5641.
Article
43. Cottam EM, Wadsworth J, Shaw AE, et al. Transmission pathways of foot-and-mouth disease virus in the United Kingdom in 2007. PLoS Pathog. 2008. 4:e1000050.
Article
44. Brake DA, McIlhaney M, Miller T, et al. Human adenovirus-vectored foot-and-mouth disease vaccines: establishment of a vaccine product profile through in vitro testing. Dev Biol (Basel). 2012. 134:123–133.
45. D'Antuono A, Laimbacher AS, La Torre J, et al. HSV-1 amplicon vectors that direct the in situ production of foot-and-mouth disease virus antigens in mammalian cells can be used for genetic immunization. Vaccine. 2010. 28:7363–7372.
46. Ren XG, Xue F, Zhu YM, et al. Construction of a recombinant BHV-1 expressing the VP1 gene of foot and mouth disease virus and its immunogenicity in a rabbit model. Biotechnol Lett. 2009. 31:1159–1165.
Article
47. Wu Q, Moraes MP, Grubman MJ. Recombinant adenovirus co-expressing capsid proteins of two serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV): in vitro characterization and induction of neutralizing antibodies against FMDV in swine. Virus Res. 2003. 93:211–219.
Article
48. Grubman MJ, Mason PW. Prospects, including time-frames, for improved foot and mouth disease vaccines. Rev Sci Tech. 2002. 21:589–600.
Article
49. Mohana Subramanian B, Madhanmohan M, Sriraman R, et al. Development of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotype O virus-like-particles (VLPs) vaccine and evaluation of its potency. Antiviral Res. 2012. 96:288–295.
Article
50. Remond M, Da Costa B, Riffault S, et al. Infectious bursal disease subviral particles displaying the foot-and-mouth disease virus major antigenic site. Vaccine. 2009. 27:93–98.
Article
51. Capozzo AV, Wilda M, Bucafusco D, et al. Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G carrying a tandem dimer of foot and mouth disease virus antigenic site A can be used as DNA and peptide vaccine for cattle. Antiviral Res. 2011. 92:219–227.
Article
52. Li Z, Yi Y, Yin X, Zhang Z, Liu J. Expression of foot-and-mouth disease virus capsid proteins in silkworm-baculovirus expression system and its utilization as a subunit vaccine. PLoS One. 2008. 3:e2273.
Article
53. Li G, Chen W, Yan W, et al. Comparison of immune responses against foot-and-mouth disease virus induced by fusion proteins using the swine IgG heavy chain constant region or beta-galactosidase as a carrier of immunogenic epitopes. Virology. 2004. 328:274–281.
Article
54. Mateo R, Luna E, Rincon V, Mateu MG. Engineering viable foot-and-mouth disease viruses with increased thermostability as a step in the development of improved vaccines. J Virol. 2008. 82:12232–12240.
Article
55. Li D. Chitosan can stop or postpone the death of the suckling mice challenged with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virol J. 2010. 7:125.
Article
56. Quattrocchi V, Bianco V, Fondevila N, Pappalardo S, Sadir A, Zamorano P. Use of new adjuvants in an emergency vaccine against foot-and-mouth disease virus: evaluation of conferred immunity. Dev Biol (Basel). 2004. 119:481–497.
57. Batista A, Quattrocchi V, Olivera V, et al. Adjuvant effect of Cliptox on the protective immune response induced by an inactivated vaccine against foot and mouth disease virus in mice. Vaccine. 2010. 28:6361–6366.
Article
58. Jaworski JP, Compaired D, Trotta M, Perez M, Trono K, Fondevila N. Validation of an r3AB1-FMDV-NSP ELISA to distinguish between cattle infected and vaccinated with foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol Methods. 2011. 178:191–200.
Article
59. Office International des Epizooties. Report of the Meeting of the OIE Ad Hoc Group on Evaluation of Nonstructural Protein Tests for Foot and Mouth Disease Diagnosis. 2002. 2002 Oct 2-4; Paris. Paris: Office International des Epizooties.
60. OIE World Organisation for Animal Health. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Chapter 8.5. Foot and mouth disease. 2012. Paris: OIE World Organisation for Animal Health.
61. Sorensen KJ, Madsen KG, Madsen ES, Salt JS, Nqindi J, Mackay DK. Differentiation of infection from vaccination in foot-and-mouth disease by the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins 3D, 3AB and 3ABC in ELISA using antigens expressed in baculovirus. Arch Virol. 1998. 143:1461–1476.
Article
62. McCullough KC, De Simone F, Brocchi E, Capucci L, Crowther JR, Kihm U. Protective immune response against foot-and-mouth disease. J Virol. 1992. 66:1835–1840.
Article
63. Black L, Francis MJ, Rweyemamu MM, Umebara O, Boge A. The relationship between serum antibody titres and protection from foot and mouth disease in pigs after oil emulsion vaccination. J Biol Stand. 1984. 12:379–389.
Article
64. OIE World Organisation for Animal Health. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. 2012. Paris: OIE World Organisation for Animal Health.
65. Parida S, Oh Y, Reid SM, et al. Interferon-gamma production in vitro from whole blood of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) vaccinated and infected cattle after incubation with inactivated FMDV. Vaccine. 2006. 24:964–969.
Article
66. Sanz-Parra A, Jimenez-Clavero MA, Garcia-Briones MM, Blanco E, Sobrino F, Ley V. Recombinant viruses expressing the foot-and-mouth disease virus capsid precursor polypeptide (P1) induce cellular but not humoral antiviral immunity and partial protection in pigs. Virology. 1999. 259:129–134.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEVR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr