Cancer Res Treat.  2017 Jul;49(3):727-738. 10.4143/crt.2016.243.

Why Do Some People Choose Opportunistic Rather Than Organized Cancer Screening? The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010-2012

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Korea. hmi@sch.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  • 3Department of Social Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Although the Korean government has implemented a universal screening program for common cancers, some individuals choose to participate in opportunistic screening programs. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify factors contributing to the selection of organized versus opportunistic screening by the Korean general population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Data from 11,189 participants aged ≥ 40 yearswho participated in the fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2010-2012) were analyzed in this study.
RESULTS
A total of 6,843 of the participants (58.6%) underwent cancer screening, of which 6,019 (51.1%) participated in organized and 824 (7.5%) participated in opportunistic screening programs. Being female, older, highly educated, in the upper quartile of income, an ex-smoker, and a light drinker as well as having supplementary private health insurance and more comorbid conditions and engaging in moderate physical activity 1-4 days per week were related to participation in both types of screening programs. Being at least a high school graduate, in the upper quartile for income, and a light drinker, as well as having more comorbid conditions and engaging in moderate physical activities 1-4 days per week had a stronger effect on those undergoing opportunistic than organized screening.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that socioeconomic factors such as education and income, as well as health status factors such as health-related quality of life and number of comorbid conditions and health behaviors such as drinking and engaging in moderate physical activity 1-4 days per week had a stronger influence on participation in an opportunistic than in an organized screening program for cancer.

Keyword

Early detection of cancer; Socioeconomic factors; Quality of life; Health behavior

MeSH Terms

Drinking
Early Detection of Cancer*
Education
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Insurance, Health
Mass Screening
Motor Activity
Nutrition Surveys*
Quality of Life
Socioeconomic Factors

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow chart of study subjects. KNHANES, Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.


Cited by  1 articles

Disparities in the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Occult Blood Test among People with Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea
Dong Wook Shin, Dongkyung Chang, Jin Hyung Jung, Kyungdo Han, So Young Kim, Kui Son Choi, Won Chul Lee, Jong Heon Park, Jong Hyock Park
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(1):60-73.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.660.


Reference

References

1. Korean National Statistical Office. Annual report on the cause of death statistics in 2014. Daejeon: Korean National Statistical Office;2015.
2. Hahm MI, Choi KS, Park EC, Kwak MS, Lee HY, Hwang SS. Personal background and cognitive factors as predictors of the intention to be screened for stomach cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17:2473–9.
Article
3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. A guide for National Cancer Screening Program in 2015. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2015.
4. Lee HY, Park EC, Jun JK, Hahm MI, Jung KW, Kim Y, et al. Trends in socioeconomic disparities in organized and opportunistic gastric cancer screening in Korea (2005-2009). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19:1919–26.
Article
5. Kim MH, Kim CY, Park YK, Park YY, Cho HJ. How did health examination including screening developed to a industry? Seoul: People's Health Institute;2015.
6. Kim KH, Park EC, Hahm MI. The gap between physicians and the public in satisfaction with the National Health Insurance system in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27:579–85.
Article
7. Yeo JY, Jeong HS. Determinants of health screening and its effects on health behaviors. Health Policy Manag. 2012; 22:49–64.
Article
8. Hahm MI, Choi KS, Lee HY, Jun JK, Oh D, Park EC. Who participates in the gastric cancer screening and on-time rescreening in the National Cancer Screening Program? A population-based study in Korea. Cancer Sci. 2011; 102:2241–7.
Article
9. Mahabaleshwarkar R, Khanna R, West-Strum D, Yang Y. Association between health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer screening. Popul Health Manag. 2013; 16:178–89.
Article
10. Kang M, Yoo KB, Park EC, Kwon K, Kim G, Kim DR, et al. Factors associated with organized and opportunistic cancer screening: results of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2007-2011. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15:3279–86.
Article
11. Park K, Park JH, Park JH, Kim HJ, Park BY. Does health status influence intention regarding screening mammography? Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40:227–33.
Article
12. Deshpande AD, McQueen A, Coups EJ. Different effects of multiple health status indicators on breast and colorectal cancer screening in a nationally representative US sample. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012; 36:270–5.
Article
13. Suzuki R, Wallace PM, Small E. Race, health-related quality of life and colorectal cancer screening rates in the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Health Behav. 2015; 39:132–9.
Article
14. Gandhi PK, Gentry WM, Kibert JL 2nd, Lee EY, Jordan W, Bottorff MB, et al. The relationship between four health-related quality-of-life indicators and use of mammography and Pap test screening in US women. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24:2113–28.
Article
15. Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Analytic Guideline (2010-2012). Osong: Korean Centes for Disease Control and Prevention;2014.
16. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47:127–41.
Article
17. Lee WC. Evidence-based National Cancer Screening Program of Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011; 54:1028–35.
Article
18. Suh M, Choi KS, Park B, Lee YY, Jun JK, Lee DH, et al. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2013. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:1–10.
Article
19. Hong JY, Kim SY, Chung KS, Kim EY, Jung JY, Park MS, et al. Factors associated with the quality of life of Korean COPD patients as measured by the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24:2549–58.
Article
20. EuroQol. EQ-5D-3L user guide: basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQol;2013.
21. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee HY, Hahm MI, Lee YY, Jun JK, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e1368.
22. Myong JP, Shin JY, Kim SJ. Factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening in Korea: the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012; 27:1061–9.
Article
23. Cho J, Guallar E, Hsu YJ, Shin DW, Lee WC. A comparison of cancer screening practices in cancer survivors and in the general population: the Korean national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES) 2001-2007. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 21:2203–12.
Article
24. Kwon YM, Lim HT, Lee K, Cho BL, Park MS, Son KY, et al. Factors associated with use of gastric cancer screening services in Korea. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15:3653–9.
Article
25. Pizzo E, Pezzoli A, Stockbrugger R, Bracci E, Vagnoni E, Gullini S. Screenee perception and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer screening: a review. Value Health. 2011; 14:152–9.
Article
26. Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000; 92:492–500.
27. Abolfotouh MA, BaniMustafa AA, Mahfouz AA, Al-Assiri MH, Al-Juhani AF, Alaskar AS. Using the health belief model to predict breast self examination among Saudi women. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:1163.
Article
28. Walker MJ, Mirea L, Glendon G, Ritvo P, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, et al. Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry. Breast. 2014; 23:482–8.
Article
29. Kim JH, Park EC, Yoo KB. Impact of perceived cancer risk on the cancer screening rate in the general Korean population: results from the Korean health panel survey data. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15:10525–9.
Article
30. Li J, Hart TL, Aronson M, Crangle C, Govindarajan A. Cancer worry, perceived risk and cancer screening in first-degree relatives of patients with familial gastric cancer. J Genet Couns. 2016; 25:520–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr