J Dent Hyg Sci.  2017 Jun;17(3):267-274. 10.17135/jdhs.2017.17.3.267.

Comparing Chewable and Manual Toothbrushes for Reducing Dental Plaque: A Pilot Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral Histology and Biology, School of Dentistry, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea.
  • 2Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University, Seongnam 13135, Korea. idsun@eulji.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Youngsan University, Yangsan 50510, Korea.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chewable toothbrush and manual toothbrush and provide basic data for recommendation of the chewable toothbrush in specific groups and situations. A total of 20 subjects participated in this study (rolling method, 10; non-rolling method, 10). After professional prophylaxis, participants used the manual toothbrush to brush their teeth for 3 minutes. After a 7-day wash-out period, participants used the chewable toothbrush according to the manufacturer's instructions. Pre- and post-plaque indexing of the teeth was performed. The dental plaque index was assessed using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) for amount of plaque and Silness-Löe Plaque Index (SLPI) for plaque thickness. The difference between pre- and post-dental plaque index was analyzed using a paired t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test was also used to compare the dental plaque index reduction rates. The dental plaque index differed significantly between the chewable toothbrush and the manual toothbrush. The TMQHPI reduction rate was significantly different between the rolling and non-rolling method groups for the manual toothbrush but not the chewable toothbrush. The difference in SLPI reduction rate between the rolling and non-rolling method groups was significant for the manual toothbrush but not for the chewable toothbrush. Differences in the dental plaque index reduction rates between the chewable and manual toothbrushes were not significant in the non-rolling method group. The results of this study showed higher reduction rates in dental plaque with manual toothbrush use than with chewable toothbrush use. However, the non-rolling method group did not show statistically significant differences according to toothbrush type. The present study showed that a chewable toothbrush can be an alternative to a manual toothbrush for individuals who have difficulty using the generally recommended rolling method.

Keyword

Chewable toothbrush; Dental care device; Dental plaque index

MeSH Terms

Abstracting and Indexing as Topic
Dental Plaque Index
Dental Plaque*
Methods
Pilot Projects*
Tooth
Full Text Links
  • JDHS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr