Endocrinol Metab.  2014 Dec;29(4):561-566. 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.4.561.

Partial Hepatectomy in Acetylation-Deficient BubR1 Mice Corroborates that Chromosome Missegregation Initiates Tumorigenesis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biological Sciences and Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. HL212@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Aneuploidy has been suggested as one of the major causes of cancer from the time of Boveri. In support of this notion, many studies have shown that cancer cells exhibit aneuploidy. However, there are evidences that do not support the aneuploidy hypothesis. We have previously reported that the spindle assembly checkpoint protein BubR1 is acetylated in mitosis and that the acetylation of BubR1 is crucial for checkpoint maintenance and chromosome-spindle attachment. Mice heterozygous for acetylation-deficient BubR1 (K243R/+) spontaneously develop cancer with chromosome instability. As K243R/+ mice develop hepatocellular carcinoma, we set out to test if chromosome mis-segregation was the cause of their liver cancer.
METHODS
Primary hepatocytes in the regenerating liver after partial hepatectomy (PH) were analyzed and compared for various mitotic parameters.
RESULTS
Primary hepatocytes isolated from K243R/+ mice after PH displayed a marked increase of chromosome misalignment, accompanied by an increase of micronuclei. In comparison, the number of nuclei per cell and the centrosome numbers were not different between wild-type and K243R/+ mice. Taken together, chromosome mis-segregation provokes tumorigenesis in mouse liver.
CONCLUSION
Our results corroborate that PH provides a reliable tool for assessing mitotic infidelity and cancer in mice.

Keyword

Partial hepatectomy; Neoplasms; Mitosis; Hepatocytes; Liver neoplasms; Aneuploidy

MeSH Terms

Acetylation
Aneuploidy
Animals
Carcinogenesis*
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Centrosome
Chromosomal Instability
Hepatectomy*
Hepatocytes
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Liver
Liver Neoplasms
M Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints
Mice*
Mitosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Proliferation capacity in regenerating hepatocytes measured by counting the mitotic cells (mitotic index) or Ki-67-positive cells (B) at the indicated time points after partial hepatectomy (PH). The values in the graph are the mean of three independent experiments (mean±SEM). (C) The regenerating liver sections were stained with H&E (upper panel) and an antibody directed against Ki-67 (lower panel). Mitotic cells are marked in the brackets. Scale bar, 50 µm.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Chromosome misalignments (left) and lagging chromosomes (right) in regenerating K243R/+ hepatocytes. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) The incidence of congression defects and lagging chromosomes compared with that of wild type (independent-samples t test) are represented as bar graphs.

  • Fig. 3 Number of centrosomes in liver sections analyzed by anti-γ-tubulin, phalloidin, and diamidino-2-phenylindole immunostaining.

  • Fig. 4 (A) Comparison of the number of nuclei in the regenerating hepatocytes of WT and K243R/+ mice. The graph represents the analysis of hepatocytes from three of each WT and K243R/+ mice, subjected to partial hepatectomy (PH). The exact number of hepatocytes counted in each group is shown in the table. (B) Model showing how the PH experiment contributed to the understanding of the mouse hepatocellular carcinoma development with chromosome instability in K243R/+ mice.


Reference

1. Boveri T. Ueber mehrpolige mitosen als mittel zur analyse des zellkerns. Vehr d phys med Ges zu Wurzburg N. 1902; 35:67–90.
2. Boveri T. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri: translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J Cell Sci. 2008; 121:Suppl 1. 1–84.
3. Harris H. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri: translated and annotated by Henry Harris: preface. J Cell Sci. 2008; 121:Suppl 1. v–vi.
4. Tang YC, Amon A. Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis. Cell. 2013; 152:394–405.
5. Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev. 2012; 26:2696–2708.
6. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10:478–487.
7. Weaver BA, Silk AD, Montagna C, Verdier-Pinard P, Cleveland DW. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell. 2007; 11:25–36.
8. Funabiki H, Wynne DJ. Making an effective switch at the kinetochore by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Chromosoma. 2013; 122:135–158.
9. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions "in check" by Bub1, Bub3 and BubR1: The dual task of attaching and signalling. Cell Cycle. 2008; 7:1763–1768.
10. Yu H. Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002; 14:706–714.
11. Park I, Lee HO, Choi E, Lee YK, Kwon MS, Min J, Park PG, Lee S, Kong YY, Gong G, Lee H. Loss of BubR1 acetylation causes defects in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling and promotes tumor formation. J Cell Biol. 2013; 202:295–309.
12. Xu P, Raetz EA, Kitagawa M, Virshup DM, Lee SH. BUBR1 recruits PP2A via the B56 family of targeting subunits to promote chromosome congression. Biol Open. 2013; 2:479–486.
13. Kruse T, Zhang G, Larsen MS, Lischetti T, Streicher W, Kragh Nielsen T, Bjorn SP, Nilsson J. Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression. J Cell Sci. 2013; 126(Pt 5):1086–1092.
14. Suijkerbuijk SJ, Vleugel M, Teixeira A, Kops GJ. Integration of kinase and phosphatase activities by BUBR1 ensures formation of stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Dev Cell. 2012; 23:745–755.
15. Choi E, Choe H, Min J, Choi JY, Kim J, Lee H. BubR1 acetylation at prometaphase is required for modulating APC/C activity and timing of mitosis. EMBO J. 2009; 28:2077–2089.
16. Choi E, Park PG, Lee HO, Lee YK, Kang GH, Lee JW, Han W, Lee HC, Noh DY, Lekomtsev S, Lee H. BRCA2 fine-tunes the spindle assembly checkpoint through reinforcement of BubR1 acetylation. Dev Cell. 2012; 22:295–308.
17. Guidotti JE, Bregerie O, Robert A, Debey P, Brechot C, Desdouets C. Liver cell polyploidization: a pivotal role for binuclear hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:19095–19101.
18. Mitchell C, Willenbring H. A reproducible and well-tolerated method for 2/3 partial hepatectomy in mice. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3:1167–1170.
19. Lee YK, Choi E, Kim MA, Park PG, Park NH, Lee H. BubR1 as a prognostic marker for recurrence-free survival rates in epithelial ovarian ca ncers. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101:504–510.
20. Thompson SL, Compton DA. Chromosome missegregation in human cells arises through specific types of kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:17974–17978.
21. Cimini D, Howell B, Maddox P, Khodjakov A, Degrassi F, Salmon ED. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J Cell Biol. 2001; 153:517–527.
22. Ganem NJ, Storchova Z, Pellman D. Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007; 17:157–162.
23. Storchova Z, Pellman D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 5:45–54.
Full Text Links
  • ENM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr