Asian Spine J.  2017 Jun;11(3):427-436. 10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.427.

Polymicrobial and Monomicrobial Infections after Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Study to Determine which Infection is more Severe

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. qiqiang_puth@sohu.com
  • 2Department of Spine Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University, Fuzhou, China.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective clinical review. PURPOSE: To investigate the difference in clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections after spinal surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal surgery are a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for spinal surgeons. Polymicrobial infections after spinal surgery seem to result in poorer outcomes than monomicrobial infections because of complementary resistance to antibiotics. However, comparison of the clinical manifestations and severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections are limited.
METHODS
Sixty-seven patients with SSIs after spinal surgery were studied: 20 patients with polymicrobial infections and 47 with monomicrobial infections. Pathogenic bacteria identified were counted and classified. Age, sex, and body mass index were compared between the two groups to identify homogeneity. The groups were compared for clinical manifestations by surgical site, postoperative time to infection, infection site, incisional drainage, incisional swelling, incisional pain, neurological signs, temperature, white blood cell count, and the percentage of neutrophils. Finally, the groups were compared for severity by hospital stay, number of rehospitalizations, number of debridements, duration of antibiotics administration, number of antibiotics administered, and implant removal.
RESULTS
Polymicrobial infections comprised 29.9% of SSIs after spinal surgery, and most polymicrobial infections (70.0%) were caused by two species of bacteria only. There was no difference between the groups in terms of clinical manifestations and severity. In total, 96 bacterial strains were isolated from the spinal wounds: 60 strains were gram-positive and 36 were gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter cloacae were cultured in order of the frequency of appearance.
CONCLUSIONS
Most polymicrobial infections were caused by two bacterial species after spinal surgery. There was no difference in clinical manifestations or severity between polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections.

Keyword

Spine; Postoperative complications; Surgical wound infection; Coinfecion

MeSH Terms

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteria
Body Mass Index
Coinfection
Debridement
Drainage
Enterobacter cloacae
Escherichia coli
Humans
Length of Stay
Leukocyte Count
Neutrophils
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies*
Spine
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Surgeons
Surgical Wound Infection
Wounds and Injuries
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Full Text Links
  • ASJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr