Korean J Sports Med.  2016 Dec;34(2):120-126. 10.5763/kjsm.2016.34.2.120.

Comparison of the Result of the Intramedullary Nail Fixation and Plate Fixation in Humeral Shaft Fracture with Butterfly Fragments

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Chungju Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Chungju, Korea. stompower@hanmail.net

Abstract

First aim of this study was to compare the results of the intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation for the management of humeral shaft fracture with butterfly fragments. Second aim of this study was to appraise the necessity of anatomical reduction and fixation for butterfly fragment in humeral shaft fracture. Thirty-one patients with comminuted humeral shaft fracture were treated by reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary nail or plate. The criteria for inclusion were AO classification type B, follow-up period more than 12 months, diaphyseal fracture without involvement of joints. Eighteen patients underwent intramedullary nail fixation and 13 by plate fixation. The outcome was assessed in terms of the union rate, union time, incidence of complications, and functional outcome of shoulder joint. The union rate was 94.4% in intramedullary nail group and 100% in plate group. The average union time was found to be no significant difference between two groups (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score and range of motion of shoulder and elbow joint between the two groups in last follow-up (p>0.05). The union rate and average union time and functional outcome of shoulder joint was no significant difference between the intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation for the management of humeral shaft fracture with butterfly fragments. It is recommended to select skillful technique to avoid technical errors rather than technique to fix of butterfly fragments.

Keyword

Humerus; Comminuted fracture; Fracture fixation; Intramedullary; Bone plate

MeSH Terms

Bone Plates
Butterflies*
Classification
Elbow
Elbow Joint
Follow-Up Studies
Fracture Fixation
Fractures, Comminuted
Humans
Humerus
Incidence
Joints
Range of Motion, Articular
Shoulder
Shoulder Joint

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Method of measurement. Proximal displacement distance (a) and distal displacement distance (b) are largest perpendicular distance of the proximal end of fragments to outer margin of cortex measured from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Length of fragments (c) is longest length of cortex of fragments measured from anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

  • Fig. 2 A 46-year-old woman sustained right humeral shaft fracture after closed intramedullary nailing. A long and displaced fragment presenting 14.9 mm between the fragment and reduced shaft was demonstrated (A) anteroposterior view, (B) lateral view. After 12 months, (C) anteroposterior, and (D) lateral radiographs showed nonunion.


Reference

1. Brinker MR, O'Connor DP. The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:290–297.
2. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J, Hansson K, Tornkvist H, Ponzer S. Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:1469–1473.
3. Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ. Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20:423–433.
4. Pidhorz L. Acute and chronic humeral shaft fractures in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101:S41–S49.
5. Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T. Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: a randomised controlled study. Int Orthop. 2007; 31:391–395.
6. Ouyang H, Xiong J, Xiang P, Cui Z, Chen L, Yu B. Plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an updated meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22:387–395.
7. Wali MG, Baba AN, Latoo IA, Bhat NA, Baba OK, Sharma S. Internal fixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate or interlocking intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014; 9:133–140.
8. Sahu RL, Ranjan R, Lal A. Fracture union in closed interlocking nail in humeral shaft fractures. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015; 128:1428–1432.
9. Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB. Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17:139–141.
10. Singisetti K, Ambedkar M. Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. 2010; 34:571–576.
11. McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82:336–339.
12. Heineman DJ, Poolman RW, Nork SE, Ponsen KJ, Bhandari M. Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81:216–223.
13. Chen AL, Joseph TN, Wolinksy PR, et al. Fixation stability of comminuted humeral shaft fractures: locked intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation. J Trauma. 2002; 53:733–737.
14. Lin SJ, Chen CL, Peng KT, Hsu WH. Effect of fragmentary displacement and morphology in the treatment of comminuted femoral shaft fractures with an intramedullary nail. Injury. 2014; 45:752–756.
15. An KC, Kim YJ, Choi JS, et al. The fate of butterfly fragments in extremity shaft comminuted fractures treated with closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Korean Fract Soc. 2012; 25:46–51.
16. Choo SK, Kim BJ, Ko HS, et al. Studies on unreduced fragments in closed interlocking nailing of comminuted femoral fracture. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1999; 34:579–586.
17. Yum JK, Lim DJ, Jung EY, Sohn SE. Clinical and radiographical follow-up for residual displacement of fracture fragments after interlocking intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Clin Should Elbow. 2013; 16:107–114.
18. Denies E, Nijs S, Sermon A, Broos P. Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010; 76:735–742.
19. Robinson CM, Bell KM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures: experience in Edinburgh over a two-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:558–562.
20. Park JY, Chun JY, Kim MH. Shoulder function after antegrade intramedullary interlocking nailing for humeral shaft fracture. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc. 2003; 6:27–36.
21. Lin J, Hou SM, Inoue N, Chao EY, Hang YS. Anatomic considerations of locked humeral nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (368):247–254.
22. Park SR, Lee TJ, Kim RS, Moon KH, You DS. Result of interlocking intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture evaluation of post-operative shoulder function. J Korean Fract Soc. 2007; 20:166–171.
23. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ. Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14:162–166.
24. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77:279–284.
25. Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG. Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (6):CD005959.
26. Lin J, Hou SM. Antegrade locked nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (365):201–210.
Full Text Links
  • KJSM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr