J Breast Cancer.  2017 Mar;20(1):12-19. 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.1.12.

Detection of Methylated Circulating DNA as Noninvasive Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Breast Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. akwong@asiabreastregistry.com
  • 2Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
  • 3Cancer Genetics Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Abstract

Internationally, breast cancer is the most common female cancer, and is induced by a combination of environmental, genetic, and epigenetic risk factors. Despite the advancement of imaging techniques, invasive sampling of breast epithelial cells is the only definitive diagnostic procedure for patients with breast cancer. To date, molecular biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity for the screening and early detection of breast cancer are lacking. Recent evidence suggests that the detection of methylated circulating cell-free DNA in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer may be a promising quantitative and noninvasive method for cancer diagnosis. Methylation detection based on a multi-gene panel, rather than on the methylation status of a single gene, may be used to increase the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening. In this review, the results of 14 relevant studies, investigating the efficacy of cell-free DNA methylation screening for breast cancer diagnosis, have been summarized. The genetic risk factors for breast cancer, the methods used for breast cancer detection, and the techniques and limitations related to the detection of cell-free DNA methylation status, have also been reviewed and discussed. From this review, we conclude that the analysis of peripheral blood or other samples to detect differentially methylated cell-free DNA is a promising technique for use in clinical settings, and may improve the sensitivity of screening for both, early detection and disease relapse, and thus improve the future prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Complementary DNA; Early detection of cancer

MeSH Terms

Biomarkers*
Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Diagnosis*
DNA Methylation
DNA*
DNA, Complementary
Early Detection of Cancer
Epigenomics
Epithelial Cells
Female
Humans
Mass Screening
Methods
Methylation
Prognosis
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Biomarkers
DNA
DNA, Complementary

Figure

  • Figure 1 Hypomethylation and hypermethylation of human genome. (A) In normal cells, cytosine and guanine dinucleotides (CpG) islands in the promoter region are unmethylated. (B) In cancer cells, promoter hypomethylation of oncogenic genes lead to transcription initiation. (C) Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes lead to gene silencing. (D) Global hypomethylation affects gene integrity and stability.


Cited by  1 articles

Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Harboring Somatic PIK3CA or KRAS Mutations
Aiko Ogasawara, Taro Hihara, Daisuke Shintani, Akira Yabuno, Yuji Ikeda, Kenji Tai, Keiichi Fujiwara, Keisuke Watanabe, Kosei Hasegawa
Cancer Res Treat. 2020;52(4):1219-1228.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.688.


Reference

1. United States Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S.: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute;2014.
2. Maughan KL, Lutterbie MA, Ham PS. Treatment of breast cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2010; 81:1339–1346.
3. Brouckaert O, Wildiers H, Floris G, Neven P. Update on triple-negative breast cancer: prognosis and management strategies. Int J Womens Health. 2012; 4:511–520.
4. Schmadeka R, Harmon BE, Singh M. Triple-negative breast carcinoma: current and emerging concepts. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014; 141:462–477.
5. Schnitt SJ. Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol. 2010; 23:Suppl 2. S60–S64.
Article
6. Jones KL, Buzdar AU. Evolving novel anti-HER2 strategies. Lancet Oncol. 2009; 10:1179–1187.
Article
7. Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N, Pusztai L, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Triple-negative breast cancer: current status and future directions. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20:1913–1927.
8. Cameron D, Brown J, Dent R, Jackisch C, Mackey J, Pivot X, et al. Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14:933–942.
Article
9. Lucci A, Hall CS, Lodhi AK, Bhattacharyya A, Anderson AE, Xiao L, et al. Circulating tumour cells in non-metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13:688–695.
Article
10. Fanale D, Amodeo V, Corsini LR, Rizzo S, Bazan V, Russo A. Breast cancer genome-wide association studies: there is strength in numbers. Oncogene. 2012; 31:2121–2128.
Article
11. Yoshida K, Miki Y. Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 as regulators of DNA repair, transcription, and cell cycle in response to DNA damage. Cancer Sci. 2004; 95:866–871.
Article
12. Ripperger T, Gadzicki D, Meindl A, Schlegelberger B. Breast cancer susceptibility: current knowledge and implications for genetic counselling. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 17:722–731.
Article
13. Mavaddat N, Barrowdale D, Andrulis IL, Domchek SM, Eccles D, Nevanlinna H, et al. Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21:134–147.
14. Nichols KE, Malkin D, Garber JE, Fraumeni JF Jr, Li FP. Germ-line p53 mutations predispose to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10:83–87.
15. Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Tischkowitz M, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL, et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:2243–2257.
Article
16. Turnbull C, Seal S, Renwick A, Warren-Perry M, Hughes D, Elliott A, et al. Gene-gene interactions in breast cancer susceptibility. Hum Mol Genet. 2012; 21:958–962.
Article
17. Cybulski C, Carrot-Zhang J, Kluźniak W, Rivera B, Kashyap A, Wokołorczyk D, et al. Germline RECQL mutations are associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2015; 47:643–646.
Article
18. Sun J, Wang Y, Xia Y, Xu Y, Ouyang T, Li J, et al. Mutations in RECQL gene are associated with predisposition to breast cancer. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11:e1005228.
Article
19. Kwong A, Shin VY, Cheuk IW, Chen J, Au CH, Ho DN, et al. Germline RECQL mutations in high risk Chinese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 157:211–215.
Article
20. Akbari MR, Cybulski C. RECQL: a DNA helicase in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:26558–26559.
Article
21. Stevens KN, Vachon CM, Couch FJ. Genetic susceptibility to triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2013; 73:2025–2030.
Article
22. Wang W, Srivastava S. Strategic approach to validating methylated genes as biomarkers for breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010; 3:16–24.
Article
23. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, Evans P, Monsees B, Monticciolo D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7:18–27.
Article
24. Morrow M, Waters J, Morris E. MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet. 2011; 378:1804–1811.
Article
25. Shetty MK. Screening for breast cancer with mammography: current status and an overview. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010; 1:218–223.
Article
26. Lieske B, Ravichandran D, Wright D. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95:62–66.
Article
27. Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, et al. Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013; 15:R92.
28. Duffy MJ. Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value? Clin Chem. 2006; 52:345–351.
Article
29. Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R, Norton L, Ravdin P, Taube S, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:5287–5312.
Article
30. Sidransky D. Emerging molecular markers of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2:210–219.
Article
31. Dahl C, Guldberg P. DNA methylation analysis techniques. Biogerontology. 2003; 4:233–250.
32. Deaton AM, Bird A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 2011; 25:1010–1022.
Article
33. Ehrlich M. DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little. Oncogene. 2002; 21:5400–5413.
Article
34. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002; 16:6–21.
Article
35. Bock C. Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13:705–719.
Article
36. Feinberg AP, Koldobskiy MA, Göndör A. Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat Rev Genet. 2016; 17:284–299.
Article
37. Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93:9821–9826.
Article
38. Clark SJ, Statham A, Stirzaker C, Molloy PL, Frommer M. DNA methylation: bisulphite modification and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1:2353–2364.
Article
39. Ng EK, Leung CP, Shin VY, Wong CL, Ma ES, Jin HC, et al. Quantitative analysis and diagnostic significance of methylated SLC19A3 DNA in the plasma of breast and gastric cancer patients. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e22233.
Article
40. Laird PW. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11:191–203.
Article
41. Tost J, Gut IG. DNA methylation analysis by pyrosequencing. Nat Protoc. 2007; 2:2265–2275.
Article
42. Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM. Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: practical considerations. Nat Rev Genet. 2002; 3:391–397.
Article
43. Rakyan VK, Down TA, Balding DJ, Beck S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12:529–541.
Article
44. Schwarzenbach H, Pantel K. Circulating DNA as biomarker in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2015; 17:136.
Article
45. Swarup V, Rajeswari MR. Circulating (cell-free) nucleic acids: a promising, non-invasive tool for early detection of several human diseases. FEBS Lett. 2007; 581:795–799.
Article
46. Chimonidou M, Strati A, Malamos N, Georgoulias V, Lianidou ES. SOX17 promoter methylation in circulating tumor cells and matched cell-free DNA isolated from plasma of patients with breast cancer. Clin Chem. 2013; 59:270–279.
Article
47. Chimonidou M, Tzitzira A, Strati A, Sotiropoulou G, Sfikas C, Malamos N, et al. CST6 promoter methylation in circulating cell-free DNA of breast cancer patients. Clin Biochem. 2013; 46:235–240.
Article
48. Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, Ibanez de Caceres I, Al-Saleem T, Cairns P. Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(18 Pt 1):6189–6193.
Article
49. Fu D, Ren C, Tan H, Wei J, Zhu Y, He C, et al. Sox17 promoter methylation in plasma DNA is associated with poor survival and can be used as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e637.
Article
50. Guerrero-Preston R, Hadar T, Ostrow KL, Soudry E, Echenique M, Ili-Gangas C, et al. Differential promoter methylation of kinesin family member 1a in plasma is associated with breast cancer and DNA repair capacity. Oncol Rep. 2014; 32:505–512.
Article
51. Hagrass HA, Pasha HF, Ali AM. Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) promoter methylation status in tumor and serum DNA in Egyptian breast cancer patients. Gene. 2014; 552:81–86.
Article
52. Hoque MO, Feng Q, Toure P, Dem A, Critchlow CW, Hawes SE, et al. Detection of aberrant methylation of four genes in plasma DNA for the detection of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:4262–4269.
Article
53. Martínez-Galán J, Torres B, Del Moral R, Muñoz-Gámez JA, Martín-Oliva D, Villalobos M, et al. Quantitative detection of methylated ESR1 and 14-3-3-sigma gene promoters in serum as candidate biomarkers for diagnosis of breast cancer and evaluation of treatment efficacy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008; 7:958–965.
Article
54. Radpour R, Barekati Z, Kohler C, Lv Q, Bürki N, Diesch C, et al. Hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes involved in critical regulatory pathways for developing a blood-based test in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e16080.
Article
55. Sharma G, Mirza S, Parshad R, Srivastava A, Gupta SD, Pandya P, et al. Clinical significance of Maspin promoter methylation and loss of its protein expression in invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlation with VEGF-A and MTA1 expression. Tumour Biol. 2011; 32:23–32.
Article
56. Silva JM, Dominguez G, Villanueva MJ, Gonzalez R, Garcia JM, Corbacho C, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of the p16INK4a gene in plasma DNA of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 1999; 80:1262–1264.
Article
57. Skvortsova TE, Rykova EY, Tamkovich SN, Bryzgunova OE, Starikov AV, Kuznetsova NP, et al. Cell-free and cell-bound circulating DNA in breast tumours: DNA quantification and analysis of tumour-related gene methylation. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94:1492–1495.
Article
58. Yamamoto N, Nakayama T, Kajita M, Miyake T, Iwamoto T, Kim SJ, et al. Detection of aberrant promoter methylation of GSTP1, RASSF1A, and RARbeta2 in serum DNA of patients with breast cancer by a newly established one-step methylation-specific PCR assay. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 132:165–173.
Article
59. Donninger H, Vos MD, Clark GJ. The RASSF1A tumor suppressor. J Cell Sci. 2007; 120(Pt 18):3163–3172.
Article
60. Xu Z, Bolick SC, DeRoo LA, Weinberg CR, Sandler DP, Taylor JA. Epigenome-wide association study of breast cancer using prospectively collected sister study samples. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105:694–700.
Article
61. Tsai PC, Bell JT. Power and sample size estimation for epigenome-wide association scans to detect differential DNA methylation. Int J Epidemiol. 2015; 44:pii: dyv041.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr