Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2016 Nov;59(6):454-462. 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.6.454.

Uterine rupture in pregnancies following myomectomy: A multicenter case series

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hwanghs@kuh.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Dankook University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eulji Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this case series was to retrospectively examine records of cases with uterine rupture in pregnancies following myomectomy and to describe the clinical features and pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS
This study was conducted as a multicenter case series. The patient databases at 7 tertiary hospitals were queried. Records of patients with a diagnosis of uterine rupture in the pregnancy following myomectomy between January 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively collected. The uterine rupture cases enrolled in this study were defined as follows: through-and-through uterine rupture or tear of the uterine muscle and serosa, occurrence from 24+0 to 41+6 weeks' gestation, singleton pregnancy, and previous laparoscopic myomectomy (LSM) or laparotomic myomectomy (LTM) status.
RESULTS
Fourteen pregnant women experienced uterine rupture during their pregnancy after LSM or LTM. Preterm delivery of less than 34 weeks' gestation occurred in 5 cases, while intrauterine fetal death occurred in 3, and 3 cases had fetal distress. Of the 14 uterine rupture cases, none occurred during labor. All mothers survived and had no sequelae, unlike the perinatal outcomes, although they were receiving blood transfusion or treatment for uterine artery embolization because of uterine atony or massive hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION
In women of childbearing age who are scheduled to undergo LTM or LSM, the potential risk of uterine rupture on subsequent pregnancy should be explained before surgery. Pregnancy in women after myomectomy should be carefully observed, and they should be adequately counseled during this period.

Keyword

Myomectomy; Pregnancy outcome; Uterine rupture

MeSH Terms

Animals
Blood Transfusion
Diagnosis
Female
Fetal Death
Fetal Distress
Hemorrhage
Humans
Mice
Mothers
Myometrium
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy*
Pregnant Women
Retrospective Studies
Serous Membrane
Tears
Tertiary Care Centers
Uterine Artery Embolization
Uterine Inertia
Uterine Rupture*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cases unsuspected of uterine rupture after myomectomy. Uterine rupture of the ‘hole’ type can be seen at the posterior uterine wall after placental delivery (case 8; A, B), and the myometrium defect (black arrow) is enclosed with the serosal membrane at the fundus of uterus (case 12; C, D). After peritoneal incision, the serosal and myometrial defects of uterus were noted incidentally and the intact fetal membranes remained and protruded forward (case 13; E, F).

  • Fig. 2 Serious uterine rupture cases after myomectomy with adverse pregnancy outcomes. (A) An approximately 6-cm-sized longitudinal tear can be seen at the right posterior uterine wall, with massive bleeding (case 6). (B) Longitudinal uterine rupture can be noted at right posterior lateral wall (case 9). (C) The uterus is torn longitudinally and ruptured throughout the right posterior wall of the uterus (case 3). (D) Before emergency cesarean section, the fetus was stillborn. Uterine rupture with protrusion of amniotic cavity and placenta, massive hemoperitoneum, and the uterine wall defect (white arrow) are found on abdominal computerized tomography (case 1).


Cited by  4 articles

Clinical experience of robotic myomectomy for fertility preservation using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predictor
So Yun Park, Juhui Kim, Kyungah Jeong, Sung Il Jung, Young Min Hur, Eun Hye Cho, Hye-Sung Moon, Hye Won Chung
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(6):726-734.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.20145.

Repetitive Spontaneous Uterine Rupture in the First Trimester after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Case Report and Review of Literature
Seungho Kim, Hye Jung Cho, Hyun Soo Park, Chae Hyeong Lee, Sang Ho Yoon, Ju-won Roh, Hayan Kwon
Perinatology. 2019;30(3):171-174.    doi: 10.14734/PN.2019.30.3.171.

A Fast 3-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reconstruction for Surgical Planning of Uterine Myomectomy
Sa Ra Lee, Young Jae Kim, Kwang Gi Kim
J Korean Med Sci. 2017;33(2):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e12.

The Effects of Myoma and Uterine Preserving Procedures for Myoma on Pregnancy Outcomes
Gi Soo Um, Hyun Sun Ko
J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2022;26(2):45-51.    doi: 10.21896/jksmch.2022.26.2.45.


Reference

1. Buttram VC Jr, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril. 1981; 36:433–445.
2. Carlson KJ, Miller BA, Fowler FJ Jr. The maine women’s health study: I. outcomes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 83:556–565.
3. Eldar-Geva T, Meagher S, Healy DL, MacLachlan V, Breheny S, Wood C. Effect of intramural, subserosal, and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70:687–691.
4. Brady PC, Stanic AK, Styer AK. Uterine fibroids and subfertility: an update on the role of myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 25:255–259.
5. Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 34:74–84.
6. Klatsky PC, Tran ND, Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198:357–366.
7. Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine rupture: a seven year review at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Community Med. 2016; 41:45–49.
8. Koo YJ, Lee JK, Lee YK, Kwak DW, Lee IH, Lim KT, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy: a single-center experience and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22:1022–1028.
9. Claeys J, Hellendoorn I, Hamerlynck T, Bosteels J, Weyers S. The risk of uterine rupture after myomectomy: a systemic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Gynecol Surg. 2014; 11:197–206.
10. Parker WH, Einarsson J, Istre O, Dubuisson JB. Risk factors for uterine rupture after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17:551–554.
11. Hackethal A, Westermann A, Tchartchian G, Oehmke F, Tinneberg HR, Muenstedt K, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy in patients with uterine myomas associated with infertility. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011; 20:338–345.
12. Trivedi P, Abreo M. Predisposing factors for fibroids and outcome of laparoscopic myomectomy in infertility. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009; 1:47–56.
13. Bernardi TS, Radosa MP, Weisheit A, Diebolder H, Schneider U, Schleussner E, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a 6-year follow-up single-center cohort analysis of fertility and obstetric outcome measures. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 290:87–91.
14. Iemura A, Kondoh E, Kawasaki K, Fujita K, Ueda A, Mogami H, et al. Expectant management of a herniated amniotic sac presenting as silent uterine rupture: a case report and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015; 28:106–112.
15. Gambacorti-Passerini Z, Gimovsky AC, Locatelli A, Berghella V. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95:724–734.
16. Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110:801–807.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr