J Adv Prosthodont.  2017 Apr;9(2):130-137. 10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.130.

Influence of nano-structured alumina coating on shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Chonbuk National University Hospita

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano-structured alumina surface coating on shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 90 disk-shaped zirconia specimens (HASS CO., Gangneung, Korea) were divided into three groups by surface treatment method: (1) airborne particle abrasion, (2) tribochemicalsilica coating, and (3) nano-structured alumina coating. Each group was categorized into three subgroups of ten specimens and bonded with three different types of dual-cured resin cements. After thermocycling, shear bond strength was measured and failure modes were observed through FE-SEM. Two-way ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test were performed to determine the effects of surface treatment method and type of cement on bond strength (P<.05). To confirm the correlation of surface treatment and failure mode, the Chi-square test was used.
RESULTS
Groups treated with the nanostructured alumina coating showed significantly higher shear bond strength compared to other groups treated with airborne particle abrasion or tribochemical silica coating. Clearfil SA Luting showed a significantly higher shear bond strength compared to RelyX ARC and RelyX Unicem. The cohesive failure mode was observed to be dominant in the groups treated with nano-structured alumina coating, while the adhesive failure mode was prevalent in the groups treated with either airborne particle abrasion or tribochemical silica coating.
CONCLUSION
Nano-structured alumina coating is an effective zirconia surface treatment method for enhancing the bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and various dual-cured resin cements.

Keyword

Airborne particles abrasion; Shear bond strength; Zirconia; Alumina coating; Resin cement

MeSH Terms

Adhesives
Aluminum Oxide*
Ceramics*
Gangwon-do
Methods
Resin Cements*
Silicon Dioxide
Adhesives
Aluminum Oxide
Resin Cements
Silicon Dioxide

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Diagram of bonded specimen.

  • Fig. 2 Mean shear bond strength values for each experimental group (P < .05). Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences.

  • Fig. 3 (A) FE-SEM image showing the airborne particle abraded Y-TZP ceramic surface, (B) FE-SEM image showing the surface of Y-TZP ceramic after tribochemical silica coating.

  • Fig. 4 (A) FE-SEM image showing the nano-structured alumina coating, (B) higher magnification FE-SEM image showing the nano-structured alumina coating.

  • Fig. 5 FE-SEM image showing a section of nano-structured alumina coated Y-TZP ceramic.

  • Fig. 6 FE-SEM images and dominant failure modes of specimens after measuring shear bond strength. Failure mode is described below the figures.

  • Fig. 7 Alumina coating covered by resin cement is shown more clearly in ×50,000 magnified image.


Reference

1. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33:415–426. PMID: 12073722.
2. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:725–731. PMID: 14511730.
3. Zidan O, Ferguson GC. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:565–571. PMID: 12815350.
Article
4. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75:18–32. PMID: 9005250.
Article
5. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35:819–826. PMID: 17825465.
Article
6. Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:1158–1162. PMID: 16005508.
Article
7. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71:381–386. PMID: 15386395.
Article
8. Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ. Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:633–638. PMID: 17765301.
Article
9. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 2005; 18:60–65. PMID: 15754894.
Article
10. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2000; 2:139–147. PMID: 11317401.
11. Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H. Innovations in bonding to zirconia-based materials: Part I. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1268–1272. PMID: 18417204.
Article
12. Aboushelib MN, Mirmohamadi H, Matinlinna JP, Kukk E, Ounsi HF, Salameh Z. Innovations in bonding to zirconiabased materials. Part II: Focusing on chemical interactions. Dent Mater. 2009; 25:989–993. PMID: 19324404.
Article
13. Mirmohammadi H, Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Innovations in bonding to zirconia based ceramics: Part III. Phosphate monomer resin cements. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:786–792. PMID: 20494433.
Article
14. Özcan M, Kerkdijk S, Valandro LF. Comparison of resin cement adhesion to Y-TZP ceramic following manufacturers' instructions of the cements only. Clin Oral Investig. 2008; 12:279–282.
Article
15. Jevnikar P, Krnel K, Kocjan A, Funduk N, Kosmac T. The effect of nano-structured alumina coating on resin-bond strength to zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:688–696. PMID: 20381854.
Article
16. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:283–290. PMID: 16039705.
Article
17. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014; 93:329–334. PMID: 24563487.
Article
18. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater. 1998; 14:64–71. PMID: 9972153.
Article
19. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LV, User A, Vallittu PK. Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent. 2006; 31:248–255. PMID: 16827029.
Article
20. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38:745–753. PMID: 17873981.
21. Blixt M, Adamczak E, Lindén LA, Odén A, Arvidson K. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13:221–226. PMID: 11203636.
22. Matinlinna JP, Heikkinen T, Ozcan M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:824–831. PMID: 16388846.
Article
23. Lüthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:195–200. PMID: 16143382.
24. Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96:104–114. PMID: 16911887.
Article
25. de Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater. 2009; 25:172–179. PMID: 18620746.
Article
26. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:267–272. PMID: 12066490.
27. Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A, Goto M, Watari F, Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25:626–631. PMID: 17076338.
Article
28. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Malament KA, Van Thompson P, Rekow ED. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19:442–448. PMID: 17323721.
29. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evalua-tion of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101:29–38. PMID: 19105989.
Article
30. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 91:930–937. PMID: 19637376.
Article
31. Gomes AL, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Lynch CD, Montero J, Albaladejo A. Influence of sandblasting granulometry and resin cement composition on microtensile bond strength to zirconia ceramic for dental prosthetic frameworks. J Dent. 2013; 41:31–41. PMID: 23022106.
Full Text Links
  • JAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr