Yonsei Med J.  2017 Jan;58(1):105-113. 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.105.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Urapidil for Older Hypertensive Patients with Acute Heart Failure: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • 2Department of Cardiology, An Zhen Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • 3Fu Yan Emergency Department, Tong Ren Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. huaqi5371@medmail.com.cn
  • 5Department of Cardiology, First Hospital affiliated with Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
  • 6Department of Cardiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
  • 7Department of Cardiology, Luhe Hospital of Beijing Tongzhou District, Beijing, China.
  • 8Department of Cardiology, Mentougou District Hospital of Beijing City, Beijing, China.
  • 9Emergency Department, First Hospital affiliated with Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • 10Emergency Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Urapidil is putatively effective for patients with hypertension and acute heart failure, although randomized controlled trials thereon are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of intravenous urapidil relative to that of nitroglycerin in older patients with hypertension and heart failure in a randomized controlled trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients (>60 y) with hypertension and heart failure were randomly assigned to receive intravenous urapidil (n=89) or nitroglycerin (n=91) for 7 days. Hemodynamic parameters, cardiac function, and safety outcomes were compared.
RESULTS
Patients in the urapidil group had significantly lower mean systolic blood pressure (110.1±6.5 mm Hg) than those given nitroglycerin (126.4±8.1 mm Hg, p=0.022), without changes in heart rate. Urapidil was associated with improved cardiac function as reflected by lower N terminal-pro B type natriuretic peptide after 7 days (3311.4±546.1 ng/mL vs. 4879.1±325.7 ng/mL, p=0.027) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (62.2±3.4% vs. 51.0±2.4%, p=0.032). Patients given urapidil had fewer associated adverse events, specifically headache (p=0.025) and tachycardia (p=0.004). The one-month rehospitalization and all-cause mortality rates were similar.
CONCLUSION
Intravenous administration of urapidil, compared with nitroglycerin, was associated with better control of blood pressure and preserved cardiac function, as well as fewer adverse events, for elderly patients with hypertension and acute heart failure.

Keyword

Urapidil; hypertension; acute heart failure; randomized controlled trial

MeSH Terms

Acute Disease
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents/*administration & dosage
Blood Pressure/drug effects
Cause of Death
Female
Heart Failure/*drug therapy/physiopathology
Heart Rate/drug effects/physiology
Hemodynamics
Humans
Hypertension/*drug therapy/physiopathology
Injections, Intravenous
Male
Middle Aged
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood
Nitroglycerin/administration & dosage
Peptide Fragments/blood
Piperazines/*administration & dosage
Ventricular Function, Left/drug effects/physiology
Antihypertensive Agents
Peptide Fragments
Piperazines
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Nitroglycerin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Effects of intravenous urapidil and nitroglycerin on SBP (A), DBP (B), and heart rate (HR) (C) within 7 days after start of treatment for older patients with hypertension and AHF. *p<0.05 between the treatment groups at the indicated time point. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; AHF, acute heart failure.

  • Fig. 2 Effects of intravenous urapidil and nitroglycerin on serum NT-proBNP (A), LVEF (B), and LVEDV (C) within 7 days after start of treatment for older patients with hypertension and AHF. *p<0.05 between the treatment groups at the indicated timepoint. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; NT-proBNP, N-terminal B type natriuretic peptide.


Reference

1. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M, Dickstein K, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 of the european society of cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:1787–1847.
2. Writing committee members, Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013; 128:e240–e327.
3. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015; 131:e29–e322.
4. Alexander P, Alkhawam L, Curry J, Levy P, Pang PS, Storrow AB, et al. Lack of evidence for intravenous vasodilators in ED patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33:133–141.
Article
5. Cicci JD, Reed BN, McNeely EB, Oni-Orisan A, Patterson JH, Rodgers JE. Acute decompensated heart failure: evolving literature and implications for future practice. Pharmacotherapy. 2014; 34:373–388.
Article
6. Felker GM, Adams KF Jr, Konstam MA, O’Connor CM, Gheorghiade M. The problem of decompensated heart failure: nomenclature, classification, and risk stratification. Am Heart J. 2003; 145:2 Suppl. S18–S25.
Article
7. Adams KF Jr, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, LeJemtel TH, Costanzo MR, Abraham WT, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am Heart J. 2005; 149:209–216.
Article
8. Zannad F, Mebazaa A, Juillière Y, Cohen-Solal A, Guize L, Alla F, et al. Clinical profile, contemporary management and one-year mortality in patients with severe acute heart failure syndromes: the EFICA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006; 8:697–705.
Article
9. Piper S, McDonagh T. The role of intravenous vasodilators in acute heart failure management. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014; 16:827–834.
Article
10. Levy PD, Laribi S, Mebazaa A. Vasodilators in acute heart failure: review of the latest studies. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2014; 2:126–132.
Article
11. Cherney D, Straus S. Management of patients with hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17:937–945.
Article
12. Elkayam U, Bitar F, Akhter MW, Khan S, Patrus S, Derakhshani M. Intravenous nitroglycerin in the treatment of decompensated heart failure: potential benefits and limitations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 9:227–241.
Article
13. den Uil CA, Brugts JJ. Impact of intravenous nitroglycerin in the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2015; 12:87–93.
Article
14. Alijotas-Reig J, Bove-Farre I, de Cabo-Frances F, Angles-Coll R. Effectiveness and safety of prehospital urapidil for hypertensive emergencies. Am J Emerg Med. 2001; 19:130–133.
Article
15. Buch J. Urapidil, a dual-acting antihypertensive agent: current usage considerations. Adv Ther. 2010; 27:426–443.
Article
16. Yang W, Zhou YJ, Fu Y, Qin J, Qin S, Chen XM, et al. A multicenter, randomized, trial comparing urapidil and nitroglycerin in multifactor heart failure in the elderly. Am J Med Sci. 2015; 350:109–115.
Article
17. Liu LS. Writing Group of 2010 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. [2010 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2011; 39:579–615.
18. Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. [Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2014]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2014; 42:98–122.
19. Carlson MD, Eckman PM. Review of vasodilators in acute decompensated heart failure: the old and the new. J Card Fail. 2013; 19:478–493.
Article
20. Mebazaa A, Longrois D, Metra M, Mueller C, Richards AM, Roessig L, et al. Agents with vasodilator properties in acute heart failure: how to design successful trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17:652–664.
Article
21. Wang RY, Chow JS, Chan KH, Pan HY, Wong RP. Acute haemodynamic and myocardial metabolic effects of intravenous urapidil in severe heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1984; 5:745–751.
Article
22. Carlyle PF, Cohn JN. Systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of alpha-adrenoceptor blockade in chronic left ventricular dysfunction in the conscious dog. Am Heart J. 1990; 120:619–624.
Article
23. Tebbe U, Wurst W, Neuhaus KL. Acute haemodynamic effects of urapidil in patients with chronic left ventricular failure. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 35:305–308.
Article
24. Zink M, Gombotz H, Wasler A, Grasser B, Rehak P, Metzler H. Urapidil reduces elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in patients before heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002; 21:347–353.
Article
25. Kozàkovà M, Marco J, Heusch G, Bernies M, Bossi IM, Palombo C, et al. The alpha1-adrenergic blocker urapidil improves contractile function in patients 3 months after coronary stenting: a randomized, double-blinded study. Am Heart J. 2004; 147:E6.
26. Yao DK, Jia SQ, Wang L, Li HW, Zhang YC, Wang YL, et al. Therapeutic effect of urapidil on myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Intern Med. 2009; 20:152–157.
Article
27. van Veldhuisen DJ, Linssen GC, Jaarsma T, van Gilst WH, Hoes AW, Tijssen JG, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:1498–1506.
Article
28. Jhund PS, Anand IS, Komajda M, Claggett BL, McKelvie RS, Zile MR, et al. Changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the I-Preserve study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17:809–817.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr