Korean J Ophthalmol.  2017 Apr;31(2):165-171. 10.3341/kjo.2017.31.2.165.

A Prospective Study of Anterior Segment Ocular Parameters in Anisometropia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India. nhsngh.89@gmail.com
  • 2Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in anterior segment ocular parameters in anisometropia >1 D.
METHODS
This study included 202 eyes of 101 subjects ranging from 10 to 40 years of age with anisometropia of 1 D or more. The subjects were divided into groups according to anisomyopia, anisoastigmatism, and anisohypermetropia. After providing informed consent, each patient underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination including cycloplegic refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, cover test, axial length (AL) measurement using A-scan ultrasound biometer, keratometry, anterior chamber depth, and central corneal thickness measurement. For each participant, the eye with greater refractive error was compared to the fellow eye via paired t-tests. Correlations between parameters were studied using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
The average age of subjects was 21.7 ± 9.3 years. Of 101 subjects, 31 had anisomyopia; 42 had anisohypermetropia; and 28 had anisoastigmatism. A predisposition toward greater myopia in right eyes was noted in anisomyopia (24 of 31 subjects, 77%). The inter-ocular acuity difference was significant in all three groups (p < 0.01). As the degree of anisometropia increased, there was significant positive correlation in the difference in AL in myopes (r = 0.863, p < 0.01) and hypermetropes (r = 0.669, p < 0.01) and the difference in corneal curvature in anisoastigmatism (r = 0.564, p = 0.002) and hypermetropes (r = 0.376, p = 0.014). A significant positive correlation was also present between the anterior chamber depth difference and refractive difference in hypermetropes (r = 0.359, p = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that anisomyopia is correlated only with anterior chamber differences. Anisohypermetropia is correlated with AL differences as well as corneal curvature difference and anterior chamber depth difference. The amount of anisoastigmatism correlates only with corneal curvature difference.

Keyword

Anisometropia; Anterior chamber depth; Axial length; Corneal curvature

MeSH Terms

Anisometropia*
Anterior Chamber
Cimetidine
Corneal Pachymetry
Humans
Informed Consent
Myopia
Prospective Studies*
Refractive Errors
Ultrasonography
Visual Acuity
Cimetidine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) The correlation between the degree of anisomyopia and inter-ocular acuity difference (IAD). (B) The correlation between anisoastigmatism and IAD. (C) The correlation between anisohypermetropia and IAD. logMAR = logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution; D = diopter.

  • Fig. 2 The linear correlation between the difference in axial length and degree of anisometropia between fellow eyes anisomyopia (A) and anisohypermetropia (B).

  • Fig. 3 The correlation between corneal curvature (K) difference and refractive difference between fellow eyes in anisoastigmatism.


Reference

1. Gawecki M, Adamski J. Anisometropia and stereopsis. Klin Oczna. 2004; 106:561–563. PMID: 15646468.
2. Weakley DR Jr. The association between nonstrabismic anisometropia, amblyopia, and subnormal binocularity. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:163–171. PMID: 11150283.
Article
3. Weakley DR Jr, Birch E, Kip K. The role of anisometropia in the development of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS. 2001; 5:153–157. PMID: 11404741.
Article
4. O'Donoghue L, McClelland JF, Logan NS, et al. Profile of anisometropia and aniso-astigmatism in children: prevalence and association with age, ocular biometric measures, and refractive status. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:602–608. PMID: 23233258.
5. Huynh SC, Wang XY, Ip J, et al. Prevalence and associations of anisometropia and aniso-astigmatism in a population based sample of 6 year old children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:597–601. PMID: 16622090.
Article
6. Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Read SA, Carney LG. Myopic anisometropia: ocular characteristics and aetiological considerations. Clin Exp Optom. 2014; 97:291–307. PMID: 24939167.
Article
7. Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006; 17:406–412. PMID: 16900036.
Article
8. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:257–263. PMID: 10676792.
Article
9. Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quigley H, et al. Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1489–1495. PMID: 9307646.
Article
10. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992; 18:125–129. PMID: 1564648.
Article
11. Holladay JT. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:1356–1370. PMID: 9423908.
Article
12. Benjamin WJ, Borish IM, editors. Borish's clinical refraction. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders;1998. p. 2–17.
13. Troilo D. Neonatal eye growth and emmetropisation: a literature review. Eye (Lond). 1992; 6(Pt 2):154–160. PMID: 1624037.
14. Olsen T, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, et al. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85:361–366. PMID: 17286626.
Article
15. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Ng TP, et al. Variations in ocular biometry in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42:73–80. PMID: 11133850.
16. Goldschmidt E, Lyhne N, Lam CS. Ocular anisometropia and laterality. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004; 82:175–178. PMID: 15043536.
Article
17. Linke SJ, Druchkiv V, Steinberg J, et al. Eye laterality: a comprehensive analysis in refractive surgery candidates. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013; 91:e363–e368. PMID: 23387503.
Article
18. Weakley DR. The association between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity in the absence of strabismus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1999; 97:987–1021. PMID: 10703148.
19. Dobson V, Miller JM, Clifford-Donaldson CE, Harvey EM. Associations between anisometropia, amblyopia, and reduced stereoacuity in a school-aged population with a high prevalence of astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49:4427–4436. PMID: 18539935.
Article
20. Levi DM, McKee SP, Movshon JA. Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vision Res. 2011; 51:48–57. PMID: 20932989.
Article
21. Chen BB, Song FW, Sun ZH, Yang Y. Anisometropia magnitude and visual deficits in previously untreated anisometropic amblyopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013; 6:606–610. PMID: 24195034.
22. Tian Y, Tarrant J, Wildsoet CF. Optical and biometric characteristics of anisomyopia in human adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011; 31:540–549. PMID: 21797915.
Article
23. Curtin BJ, editor. The myopias: basic science and clinical management. Philadelphia: Harper and Row;1985. p. 277–385.
24. Tekin K, Cankurtaran V, Inanc M, et al. Effect of myopic anisometropia on anterior and posterior ocular segment parameters. Int Ophthalmol. 2017; 37:377–384. PMID: 27262559.
Article
25. Kim SY, Cho SY, Yang JW, et al. The correlation of differences in the ocular component values with the degree of myopic anisometropia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2013; 27:44–47. PMID: 23372379.
Article
26. Logan NS, Gilmartin B, Wildsoet CF, Dunne MC. Posterior retinal contour in adult human anisomyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:2152–2162. PMID: 15223789.
Article
27. Goss DA, Erickson P. Meridional corneal components of myopia progression in young adults and children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987; 64:475–481. PMID: 3631204.
Article
28. Shih YF, Chiang TH, Lin LL. Lens thickness changes among schoolchildren in Taiwan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:2637–2644. PMID: 19234352.
Article
29. Strang NC, Schmid KL, Carney LG. Hyperopia is predominantly axial in nature. Curr Eye Res. 1998; 17:380–383. PMID: 9561829.
Article
30. Demircan S, Gokce G, Yuvaci I, et al. The assessment of anterior and posterior ocular structures in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 21:1181–1188. PMID: 25910432.
Article
31. Yuksel N, Yuksel E, Ozer MD. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters using the Pentacam in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic and normal eyes. J AAPOS. 2014; 18:248–250. PMID: 24924277.
Article
32. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. The clinical profile of moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:281–287. PMID: 11879130.
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr