J Korean Med Assoc.  2016 Dec;59(12):969-976. 10.5124/jkma.2016.59.12.969.

Fellows' perception of fellowship training and overarching issues

• Yang EB
• Kim SW
• Kim JJ
• Eun BL
• Oh ST
• Cha BS
• Lee SK
• Chung HS
• Kim DI

• KMID: 2364062
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2016.59.12.969

Abstract

Patient expectations for specialized medical care have spawned fellowship programs that require additional subspecialty training after residency training completion. The present study assessed the curricula and training environment adequacy of fellowship programs as perceived by current trainees and identified improvement areas for South Korea's overall fellowship program. A questionnaire was distributed to 1,764 fellows training at 6 university hospitals in Seoul, Korea during October 2014. From a return rate of 33.1%, 26.2% (403 responses) of all questionnaires distributed were compete enough to include in the analysis. Fellows participating in the survey were enrolled in fellowship programs with occupational aspirations of professorship and academic aspirations of subspecialty exploration. Nevertheless, more than half of the participating fellows did not have a clear understanding of their program's objectives. Many hoped for reduced clinical hours, increased research time allowance, and higher pay compared to current training environment and salary. The fellows' satisfaction with their program's curriculum and training environment was above 3 points on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Receiving a training objective and financial support for academic activities by the training institution were factors influencing fellows' satisfaction level regarding both the curriculum and training environment. Clearly defined program objectives, a specialized curriculum for fellows, improved working conditions, and reflection on medical workforce policies are imperative for the advancement of Korean fellowship programs.

Keyword

Fellow; Curriculum; Training environment; Personal satisfaction

MeSH Terms

Aspirations (Psychology)
Curriculum
Fellowships and Scholarships*
Financial Support
Hope
Hospitals, University
Humans
Internship and Residency
Korea
Personal Satisfaction
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Seoul

Reference

1. Kim DI, Kim JJ, Yang EB, Kim SW, Lee SK, Chung HS, Oh ST, Eun BL, Cha BS. A study on the current status and future direction of medical sub-specialty training system in Korea. Seoul: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences;2014.

2. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Third report. Improving access to health care through physician workforce reform: directions for the 21st century. Rockville: US Department of Health and Human Services;1992.

3. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. Survey on the current status of sub-specialty program. Seoul: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences;2000.

4. Parshuram CS, Dhanani S, Kirsh JA, Cox PN. Fellowship training, workload, fatigue and physical stress: a prospective observational study. CMAJ. 2004; 170:965–970.

5. Wax PM, Donovan JW. Fellowship training in medical toxicology: characteristics, perceptions, and career impact. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2000; 38:637–642.

6. Rinder HM, Wagner J. ASCP fellowship & job market survey. Chicago: American Society for Clinical Pathology;2012.

7. Lagwinski N, Hunt JL. Fellowship trends of pathology residents. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009; 133:1431–1436.

8. Rosenberg ME. Adult nephrology fellowship training in the United States: trends and issues. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18:1027–1033.

9. Whitcomb ME, Walter DL. Research training in six selected internal medicine fellowship programs. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133:800–807.

10. Kim SW, Kwon WI, Kang MJ. Study for settlement of sub-specialty training program in South Korea. Seoul: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences;2013.

11. In : Shin JY, editor. A study on activating of sub-specialty training program. Proceedings of the 65th the Korean Academy of Family Medicine Conference; 2013 April 4-7; Daegu, Korea. Daegu: Inter-Burgo;2013.

12. Shin YS, Lee SH, Shin IS. Evaluation and policy recommendation of the accreditation program for medical subspecialty board certification. Seoul: Research Institute for Healthcare Policy;2011.

13. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;1949.

14. Gruppen LD, Simpson D, Searle N, Robins L, Irby DM, Mullan PB. Educational fellowship programs: common themes and overarching issues. Acad Med. 2006; 81:990–994.

15. Langdon LO, Toskes PP, Kimball HR. Future roles and training of internal medicine subspecialists: American Board of Internal Medicine Task force on Subspecialty Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124:686–691.

16. American Board of Internal Medicine. Policies procedures for certification [Internet]. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine;2016. cited 2016 Jan 1. Available from:http://www.abim.org/~/media/ABIM%20Public/Files/pdf/publications/certification-guides/policies-and-procedures.pdf.

17. Prashker MJ, Meenan RF. Subspecialty training: is it financially worthwhile? Ann Intern Med. 1991; 115:715–719.