J Korean Med Sci.  2016 Dec;31(12):1976-1982. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.1976.

Impact of Young Age at Diagnosis on Survival in Patients with Surgically Treated Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Multicenter Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea. urokyj@cbnu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.
  • 3Department of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Urology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 6Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 7Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

The prognostic significance of age in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a subject of debate. The aim of the present multi-institutional study was to evaluate the impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival in a large cohort of patients with RCC. A total of 5,178 patients who underwent surgery for RCC at eight institutions in Korea between 1999 and 2011 were categorized into three groups according to age at diagnosis as follows: young age (< 40 years, n = 541), middle-age (≥ 40 and < 60 years, n = 2,551), and old age (≥ 60 years, n = 2,096) groups. Clinicopathological variables and survival rates were compared between the three groups. Young patients had lower stage tumors with a low Fuhrman grade, a lower rate of lymphovascular invasion than patients in the other age groups. Regarding histologic type, the young age group had a lower percentage of clear cell histology and a greater incidence of Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that cancer-specific survival was significantly better in the young age group than in the other groups (log rank test, P = 0.008). However, age at diagnosis was not an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, young age at diagnosis was associated with favorable pathologic features, although it was not an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with surgically-treated RCC. Age itself should not be regarded as a crucial determinant for the treatment of RCC.

Keyword

Renal Cell Carcinoma; Nephrectomy; Age; Recurrence; Survival

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Renal Cell*
Cohort Studies
Diagnosis*
Humans
Incidence
Korea
Multivariate Analysis
Nephrectomy
Recurrence
Survival Rate

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves. (A) Recurrence-free survival, (B) Cancer-specific survival according to age categories in patients with surgically-treated renal cell carcinoma.


Cited by  1 articles

Trends in clinical, operative, and pathologic characteristics of surgically treated renal mass in a Korean center: A surgical series from 1988 through 2015
Ho Won Kang, Sung Pil Seo, Won Tae Kim, Seok Joong Yun, Sang-Cheol Lee, Wun-Jae Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Seok Ho Kang, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jinsoo Chung, Tae Gyun Kwon, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Cheol Kwak, Seok-Soo Byun, Yong-June Kim,
Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60(3):184-194.    doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.3.184.


Reference

1. Verhoest G, Veillard D, Guillé F, De La Taille A, Salomon L, Abbou CC, Valéri A, Lechevallier E, Descotes JL, Lang H, et al. Relationship between age at diagnosis and clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:1298–1304.
2. Lee HW, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Choi HY, Lee HM. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of radiologic node-positive renal cell carcinoma in the absence of distant metastases: a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing nephrectomy and lymph node dissection. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1321–1327.
3. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S, Dabestani S, Hofmann F, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Lam T, Marconi L, Merseburger AS, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015; 67:913–924.
4. Fujioka T, Obara W; Committee for Establishment of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma and the Japanese Urological Association. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for renal cell carcinoma: the Japanese Urological Association 2011 update. Int J Urol. 2012; 19:496–503.
5. Donat SM, Diaz M, Bishoff JT, Coleman JA, Dahm P, Derweesh IH, Herrell SD 3rd, Hilton S, Jonasch E, Lin DW, et al. Follow-up for clinically localized renal neoplasms: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190:407–416.
6. Xiong Q, Valero V, Kau V, Kau SW, Taylor S, Smith TL, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL. Female patients with breast carcinoma age 30 years and younger have a poor prognosis: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2001; 92:2523–2528.
7. Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, Kang D, Kim SW, Youn YK, Oh SK, Choe KJ, Noh DY. Young age: an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2004; 4:82.
8. Delaloye JF, Pampallona S, Coucke PA, De Grandi P. Younger age as a bad prognostic factor in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 64:201–205.
9. Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Aravantinos G, Bamias A, Kalofonos HP, Skarlos D, Briasoulis E, Konstantara A, Economopoulos T, Dimopoulos MA. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs older women: is age an independent prognostic factor? The Hellenic Oncology Cooperative Group experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17:1003–1010.
10. Ries LA. Ovarian cancer. Survival and treatment differences by age. Cancer. 1993; 71:524–529.
11. Voutilainen PE, Multanen MM, Leppäniemi AK, Haglund CH, Haapiainen RK, Franssila KO. Prognosis after lymph node recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma depends on age. Thyroid. 2001; 11:953–957.
12. Sánchez-Ortiz RF, Rosser CJ, Madsen LT, Swanson DA, Wood CG. Young age is an independent prognostic factor for survival of sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004; 171:2160–2165.
13. Denzinger S, Otto W, Burger M, Hammerschmied C, Junker K, Hartmann A, Wieland WF, Walter B. Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates? World J Surg Oncol. 2007; 5:16.
14. Taccoen X, Valeri A, Descotes JL, Morin V, Stindel E, Doucet L, Joulin V, Bocqueraz F, Coulange C, Rambeaud JJ, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in adults 40 years old or less: young age is an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:980–987.
15. Jung EJ, Lee HJ, Kwak C, Ku JH, Moon KC. Young age is independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival of low-stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2009; 73:137–141.
16. Abou El Fettouh HI, Cherullo EE, El-Jack M, Al Maslamani Y, Novick AC. Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young adults: presentation, treatment, and outcome. Urology. 2002; 60:806–810.
17. Goetzl MA, Desai M, Mansukhani M, Goluboff ET, Katz AE, Sawczuk IS, Benson MC, Olsson CA, McKiernan JM. Natural history and clinical outcome of sporadic renal cortical tumors diagnosed in the young adult. Urology. 2004; 63:41–45.
18. Thompson RH, Ordonez MA, Iasonos A, Secin FP, Guillonneau B, Russo P, Touijer K. Renal cell carcinoma in young and old patients--is there a difference? J Urol. 2008; 180:1262–1266.
19. Hupe MC, Merseburger AS, Lokeshwar VB, Eggers H, Rott H, Wegener G, Abbas M, Kuczyk MA, Herrmann TR. Age--an independent prognostic factor of clinical outcome in renal malignancies: results of a large study over two decades. World J Urol. 2014; 32:115–121.
20. Byun SS, Hong SK, Lee S, Kook HR, Lee E, Kim HH, Kwak C, Ku JH, Jeong CW, Lee JY, et al. The establishment of KORCC (KOrean Renal Cell Carcinoma) database. Investig Clin Urol. 2016; 57:50–57.
21. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:1471–1474.
22. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982; 6:655–663.
23. Gillett MD, Cheville JC, Karnes RJ, Lohse CM, Kwon ED, Leibovich BC, Zincke H, Blute ML. Comparison of presentation and outcome for patients 18 to 40 and 60 to 70 years old with solid renal masses. J Urol. 2005; 173:1893–1896.
24. Komai Y, Fujii Y, Iimura Y, Tatokoro M, Saito K, Otsuka Y, Koga F, Arisawa C, Kawakami S, Okuno T, et al. Young age as favorable prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival in localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2011; 77:842–847.
25. Jeong IG, Yoo CH, Song K, Park J, Cho YM, Song C, Hong JH, Ahn H, Kim CS. Age at diagnosis is an independent predictor of small renal cell carcinoma recurrence-free survival. J Urol. 2009; 182:445–450.
26. Karakiewicz PI, Jeldres C, Suardi N, Hutterer GC, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, Ficarra V, Cindolo L, de La Taille A, Tostain J, et al. Age at diagnosis is a determinant factor of renal cell carcinoma-specific survival in patients treated with nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008; 2:610–617.
27. Hakim FT, Flomerfelt FA, Boyiadzis M, Gress RE. Aging, immunity and cancer. Curr Opin Immunol. 2004; 16:151–156.
28. Armah HB, Parwani AV. Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134:124–129.
29. Winarti NW, Argani P, De Marzo AM, Hicks J, Mulyadi K. Pediatric renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008; 16:66–72.
30. Argani P, Olgac S, Tickoo SK, Goldfischer M, Moch H, Chan DY, Eble JN, Bonsib SM, Jimeno M, Lloreta J, et al. Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma in adults: expanded clinical, pathologic, and genetic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007; 31:1149–1160.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr