Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2016 Sep;22(3):170-181. 10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.170.

Identification of Nursing Diagnosis-Outcome-Intervention Linkages for Inpatients in Gynecology Department Nursing Units

• Yang MJ
• Kim HY

• KMID: 2353891
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.170

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to identify the nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkages for gynecology inpatients shown in their electronic nursing records.
METHODS
This retrospective and descriptive research was conducted in two steps and based on the 287 electronic nursing records for 253 patients. First, nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions were collected. To identify major nursing diagnoses, a comparison was done with the top 10 nursing diagnoses from this research and with previous research selected using a content validity index developed by a team of professionals. Second, nursing outcomes and interventions that were associated with major nursing diagnoses were identified.
RESULTS
Nineteen nursing diagnoses, 12 nursing outcomes, and 40 nursing interventions were collected. The top 5 major nursing diagnoses were identified and 7 nursing outcomes and 18 nursing interventions associated with these diagnoses were checked.
CONCLUSION
The identified NANDA-NOC-NIC linkages can contribute to improving nursing practice and will help in the establishment of standardized nursing care.

Keyword

Nursing process; Gynecology department; Inpatient

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Gynecology*
Humans
Inpatients*
Nursing Care
Nursing Diagnosis
Nursing Process
Nursing Records
Nursing*
Retrospective Studies

Reference

1. Choi SH, Kim YJ, Moon H, Park MJ, Sun JJ. Nursing process. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2010. p. 12–20.

2. Lundberg CB, Warren JJ, Brokel J, Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, et al. Selecting a standardized terminology for the electronic health record that reveals the impact of nursing on patient care. Online J Nurs Inform. 2008; 12(2):1–19.

3. Park HJ, Lee EJ. Incorporating standardized nursing languages into an electronic nursing documentation system in Korea: A pilot study. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015; 26(1):35–42.

4. Saranto K, Kinnunen UM, Kivekäs E, Lappalainen AM, Liljamo P, Rajalahti E, et al. Impacts of structuring nursing records: A systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014; 28(4):629–647.

5. NANDA-International. Nursing diagnoses: Definition and classification 2012-2014. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Blackwell;2012.

6. Johnson M, Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Maas ML, Moorhead S, Swanson E. NOC and NIC linkages to NANDA-I and clinical conditions. 3rd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elserver;2011.

7. Kim YJ, Jo KH. Effects of nurse presence program on anxiety and physiological indicators in patients with gynecological surgery. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2014; 16(4):326–333.

8. Ko E, So HS. Construction and application of nursing information system using NANDA-NOC-NIC linkage in medicalsurgical nursing units. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2013; 25(4):365–376.

9. Chi MK, Chi SA. Linkages of nursing diagnosis, nursing intervention and nursing outcome classification of breast cancer patients using nursing database. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2003; 9(4):651–661.

10. Hughes R, Sheerin F, McCourt F. Identifying and defining the problems, interventions, and outcomes of spinal cord injured patients in the Irish Spinal Cord Injury Service using standardized nursing language: A delphi study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006; 17(1):36–37.

11. Park IS, Yoo CS, Lee SH, Woo KS, Joo YH, Choi WH, et al. Evaluation on the record completeness of the nursing process in electronic nursing record for patients undertaken gastrectomy. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2009; 15(3):107–116.

12. Yoo HS, Chi SA. Construction of linkage database on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes in abdominal surgery patients. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2001; 7(3):425–437.

13. Minthorn C, Lunney M. Participant action research with bedside nurses to identify NANDA-International, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification categories for hospitalized persons with diabetes. Appl Nurs Res. 2012; 25(2):75–80.

14. Song SM, So HS, An MJ. Identification of major nursing diagnosis, nursing outcomes, and nursing interventions (NNN) linkage for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2014; 26(4):413–423.

15. Azzolin K, Mussi CM, Ruschel KB, de Souza EN, de Fátima Lucena A, Rabelo-Silva ER. Effectiveness of nursing interventions in heart failure patients in home care using NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC. Appl Nurs Res. 2013; 26(4):239–244.

16. Park HJ. Identifying Core NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses, NIC interventions, NOC outcomes, and NNN linkages for heart failure. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2014; 25(1):30–38.

17. Moon MK. Relationship of nursing diagnoses, nursing outcomes, and nursing interventions for patient care in intensive care units [dissertation]. Iowa: University of Iowa;2011.

18. Barreto LN, Swanson EA, de Abreu Almeida M. Nursing outcomes for the diagnosis impaired tissue integrity (00044) in adults with pressure ulcer. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016; 27(2):104–110.

19. Cho EJ, Kim NC. Validation of major nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkage for adult surgery patients of post anesthetic care unit. J Korean Clin Nurs Res. 2008; 14(3):141–151.

20. Kim MJ. Analysis on military hospital nursing records by NANDA, NIC, NOC system. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010; 16(1):73–85.

21. Lee EJ, Choi SH. Identification of nursing diagnosis-outcomeintervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkages in surgical nursing unit. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2011; 23(2):180–188.

22. Noh HK, Lee EJ. Relationships among NANDA-I diagnoses, nursing outcomes classification, and nursing interventions classification by nursing students for patients in medical-surgical units in Korea. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2015; 26(1):43–51.

23. Kim JK. A study on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes frequently used and linkage to NANDA-NOC-NIC in major nursing departments. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010; 16(2):121–142.

24. Hong SJ, Lee SH, Kim HS. Analysis of nursing interventions performed by gynecological nursing unit nurses using the nursing interventions classification. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2011; 17(3):275–284.

25. Lampe S. Focus charting: Documentation for patient-centered care. Minneapolis: Creative Nursing Management;1994. p. 193–197.

26. Moorhead S, Johnson M, Mass ML, Swanson E. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). 5th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elsevier;2013.

27. Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, Wagner C. Nursing interventions classification (NIC). 6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elsevier;2013.

28. Choi SH, Cho BH, Chi HR, Lee EJ, Kim HS, Park MJ. Standardized NANDA, NOC, NIC linkage. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2004.

29. Fehring RJ. Method to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung. 1987; 16(6 Pt 1):625–629.

30. Park JE, Chung KA, Cho H, Kim HS. Construction of the nursing diagnosis ontology in obstetric and gynecologic nursing unit using nursing process and SNOMED CT. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013; 19(1):1–12.