Clin Endosc.  2016 Jul;49(4):355-358. 10.5946/ce.2016.063.

Resection of Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: What Is the Optimal Technique?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Chosun University School of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea. leejun@chosun.ac.kr

Abstract

Colorectal polyps are classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic on the basis of malignant potential. All neoplastic polyps should be completely removed because both the incidence of colorectal cancer and the mortality of colorectal cancer patients have been found to be strongly correlated with incomplete polypectomy. The majority of colorectal polyps discovered on diagnostic colonoscopy are diminutive and small polyps; therefore, complete resection of these polyps is very important. However, there is no consensus on a method to remove diminutive and small polyps, and various techniques have been adopted based on physician preference. The aim of this article was to review the diverse techniques used to remove diminutive and small polyps and to suggest which technique will be the most effective.

Keyword

Polyps; Colorectal; Technique; Resection

MeSH Terms

Colonoscopy
Colorectal Neoplasms
Consensus
Humans
Incidence
Methods
Mortality
Polyps*

Reference

1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47:127–141.
Article
2. Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1095–1105.
Article
3. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Rickert A, Hoffmeister M. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154:22–30.
4. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 31:210–217.
Article
5. Shin SJ, Lee SH, Park DI, et al. A Korean National Survey for treatment modality in colon polypectomy. Intest Res. 2011; 9:196–205.
Article
6. Matsuda T, Kawano H, Hisabe T, et al. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Dig Endosc. 2014; 26 Suppl 2:104–108.
Article
7. Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60:414–418.
Article
8. Jung YS, Park JH, Kim HJ, et al. Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2013; 45:1024–1029.
Article
9. Efthymiou M, Taylor AC, Desmond PV, Allen PB, Chen RY. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:312–316.
Article
10. Woods A, Sanowski RA, Wadas DD, Manne RK, Friess SW. Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989; 35:536–540.
Article
11. Liu S, Ho SB, Krinsky ML. Quality of polyp resection during colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance? Dig Dis Sci. 2012; 57:1786–1791.
Article
12. Draganov PV, Chang MN, Alkhasawneh A, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:118–126.
Article
13. Park SK, Ko BM, Han JP, Hong SJ, Lee MS. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83:527–532. e1.
14. Vanagunas A, Jacob P, Vakil N. Adequacy of “hot biopsy” for the treatment of diminutive polyps: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84:383–385.
15. Peluso F, Goldner F. Follow-up of hot biopsy forceps treatment of diminutive colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:604–606.
Article
16. Tsai CJ, Lu DK. Small colorectal polyps: histopathology and clinical significance. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995; 90:988–994.
17. Lee SH, Shin SJ, Park DI, et al. Korean guidelines for colonoscopic polypectomy. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012; 59:85–98.
Article
18. Hewett DG. Cold snare polypectomy: optimizing technique and technology (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:693–696.
Article
19. Horiuchi A, Hosoi K, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:686–692.
Article
20. Gostout CJ. Ode to the submucosal fluid cushion. Endoscopy. 2004; 36:638–639.
Article
21. Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut. 2014; 63:949–956.
Article
22. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB, Lederle FA, Bond JH. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4:1259–1264.
Article
23. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary polyp prevention trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61:385–391.
Article
24. Raad D, Tripathi P, Cooper G, Falck-Ytter Y. Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83:508–515.
Article
25. Lee CK, Shim JJ, Jang JY. Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108:1593–1600.
Article
26. Gomez V, Badillo RJ, Crook JE, Krishna M, Diehl NN, Wallace MB. Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos). Endosc Int Open. 2015; 3:E76–E80.
27. Kim JS, Lee BI, Choi H, et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:741–747.
Article
28. Wadas DD, Sanowski RA. Complications of the hot biopsy forceps technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34:32–37.
Article
29. Yasar B, Kayadibi H, Abut E, Benek D, Kochan K, Gonen C. The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:217–225.
Article
30. Aslan F, Camci M, Alper E, et al. Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014; 25:279–283.
Article
31. Horiuchi A, Makino T, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Kato N, Tanaka N. Comparison of newly found polyps after removal of small colorectal polyps with cold or hot snare polypectomy. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2015; 78:406–410.
32. Ichise Y, Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Digestion. 2011; 84:78–81.
Article
33. Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Konstantinidis K, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps. Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13:e345–e348.
Article
34. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79:417–423.
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr