Korean J Urol.  2015 Sep;56(9):644-649. 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.644.

Can a dual-energy computed tomography predict unsuitable stone components for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

• Ahn SH
• Oh TH
• Seo IY

• KMID: 2344103
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.644

Abstract

PURPOSE
To assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to identify urinary stone components, particularly uric acid and calcium oxalate monohydrate, which are unsuitable for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This clinical study included 246 patients who underwent removal of urinary stones and an analysis of stone components between November 2009 and August 2013. All patients received preoperative DECT using two energy values (80 kVp and 140 kVp). Hounsfield units (HU) were measured and matched to the stone component.
RESULTS
Significant differences in HU values were observed between uric acid and nonuric acid stones at the 80 and 140 kVp energy values (p<0.001). All uric acid stones were red on color-coded DECT images, whereas 96.3% of the nonuric acid stones were blue. Patients with calcium oxalate stones were divided into two groups according to the amount of monohydrate (calcium oxalate monohydrate group: monohydrate> or =90%, calcium oxalate dihydrate group: monohydrate<90%). Significant differences in HU values were detected between the two groups at both energy values (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
DECT improved the characterization of urinary stone components and was a useful method for identifying uric acid and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones, which are unsuitable for ESWL.

Keyword

Calcium oxalate; Uric acid; Urinary calculi; X-ray computed tomography

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Calcium Oxalate/analysis
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi/*chemistry/*radiography/therapy
*Lithotripsy
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods
Ureteral Calculi/*chemistry/*radiography/therapy
Uric Acid/analysis
Calcium Oxalate
Uric Acid

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 (A) Uric acid and nonuric acid stones in color-coded images. Dual-energy computed tomography had excellent sensitivity and accuracy for differentiating uric acid from nonuric acid stones. Uric acid stones are red in the color-coded image (a), and nonuric acid stones are blue (b) (arrow). (B) Measuring Hounsfield unit (HU) values using the region of interest (ROI) method. One radiological specialist drew a circular ROI along the inner edge of the stone to measure the HU value. An HU value of 946.33 was determined for the left uretero-vesical junction stone.

• 

  Fig. 2 Mean Hounsfield unit (HU) values for stones based on the energy used. Different HU values were measured on 80 and 140 kVp images of each stone. CaOM, calcium oxalate monohydrate; CaOD, calcium oxalate monohydrate+dihydrate; Carbonate, carbonate apatite.

Reference

1. Sourtzis S, Thibeau JF, Damry N, Raslan A, Vandendris M, Bellemans M. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172:1491–1494.

2. Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998; 52:982–987.

3. Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, et al. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8:212–217.

4. Niall O, Russell J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1999; 161:534–537.

5. Wang JH, Shen SH, Huang SS, Chang CY. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008; 71:30–36.

6. Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34:409–419.

7. Miller NL, Lingeman JE. Management of kidney stones. BMJ. 2007; 334:468–472.

8. Galvin DJ, Pearle MS. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi. BJU Int. 2006; 98:1283–1288.

9. Dussol B. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Rev Prat. 2011; 61:389–392.

10. Gonzalez Enguita C, Rodriguez Minon-Cifuentes JL, Cabrera Perez J, Garcia de la Pena E, Calahorra Fernandez FJ, Garcia Cardoso J, et al. ESWL-resistant lithiasis. Actas Urol Esp. 1999; 23:247–255.

11. Karcaaltıncaba M, Aktas A. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011; 17:181–194.

12. Primak AN, Vrtiska TJ, Qu M, McCollough CH. Abdominal imaging: kidney stone differentiation. In : Johnson TR, Fink C, Schonberg SO, Reiser MF, editors. Dual energy CT in clinical practice. Heidelberg: Springer;2010. p. 177–192.

13. Ouzaid I, Al-qahtani S, Dominique S, Hupertan V, Fernandez P, Hermieu JF, et al. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study. BJU Int. 2012; 110(11 Pt B):E438–E442.

14. Nakasato T, Morita J, Ogawa Y. Evaluation of Hounsfield units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition. Urolithiasis. 2015; 43:69–75.

15. Sun XZ, Zhang ZW. Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones. Asian J Surg. 2006; 29:36–39.

16. Tomescu P, Panuş A, Mitroi G, Dragoescu O, Stoica L, Dena S, et al. Assessment of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Therapeutic Efficiency in Urolithiasis. Curr Health Sci J. 2009; 35:40–43.

17. Ferrandino MN, Pierre SA, Simmons WN, Paulson EK, Albala DM, Preminger GM. Dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing: improved determination of urinary stone composition. J Endourol. 2010; 24:347–354.

18. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Rentsch K, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation. Urol Res. 2008; 36:133–138.

19. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, Staehler M, Haseke N, Nikolaou K, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43:112–119.

20. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, et al. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 2007; 14:1441–1447.

21. Eliahou R, Hidas G, Duvdevani M, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010; 31:315–320.

22. Thomas C, Krauss B, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Werner M, et al. Differentiation of urinary calculi with dual energy CT: effect of spectral shaping by high energy tin filtration. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45:393–398.

23. Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E. Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. Urology. 2008; 72:1164–1168.

24. Wisenbaugh ES, Paden RG, Silva AC, Humphreys MR. Dual-energy vs conventional computed tomography in determining stone composition. Urology. 2014; 83:1243–1247.

25. Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T, Pfammatter T, Peter N, Scheffel H, Lachat M, et al. Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT. Radiology. 2008; 249:682–691.

26. Thomas C, Patschan O, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, et al. Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19:1553–1559.

27. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Rentsch K, Baumuller S, Desbiolles L, et al. Characterization of urinary stones with dual-energy CT: improved differentiation using a tin filter. Invest Radiol. 2010; 45:1–6.

28. Jepperson MA, Cernigliaro JG, Ibrahim el-SH, Morin RL, Haley WE, Thiel DD. In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol. 2015; 29:141–146.