J Korean Med Assoc.  2014 Feb;57(2):121-127.

Doctors' competency and empowerment measures desired by the state and society

• Heo YJ

Abstract

The foundation of medical practice is the doctor-patient relationship. Before the implementation of National Health Insurance in Korea, it was not easy for patients to access doctors, and the doctor-patient relationship was immature. This study aims to describe doctors' social competency and determine measures of its strength in Korea. The current status of research on doctors' social competency in Korea and other countries was reviewed. There is recognition that Korean doctors have confidence in their medical knowledge, but their leadership in the health care sector and society is insufficient. A survey of citizens' expectations regarding doctors' social competency shows that they are not satisfied with their doctors' communication, and feel their doctors have not fulfilled their leadership duties as influential members of society e main reason for respondents' dissatisfaction was the doctors' pursuit of profit. They expected that the quality of care would increase if doctors' social capabilities were strengthened and both the doctors themselves and the government were to participate in capacity building. The preferable approach to reinforcing the social ability of doctors is to include medical humanities and social science in the medical education curriculum. Then, medical students can grow as good doctors and effective leaders. Several reports from outside Korea have confirmed this. Doctors need to recognize that the concept of health is broad, encompassing societal factors as one of the determinants of health. In conclusion, the effort of the community as a whole is needed for strengthening the social competence of doctors in Korea.

Keyword

Social competency; Medical education

MeSH Terms

Capacity Building
Curriculum
Education, Medical
Health Care Sector
Humanities
Humans
Korea
Leadership
Mental Competency
National Health Programs
Power (Psychology)*
Social Sciences
Students, Medical

Reference

1. Navarro V. Medicine under capitalism. New York: Prodist;1976.

2. Jo BH. Medical reform and medical power. Seoul: Nanam Publishing House;2003.

3. So KH. "Competency" in the context of schooling: it's meaning and curricular implications. J Curriculum Stud. 2007; 25:1–21.

4. Heo YJ, Kwon I, Rhee OJ, Ahn DS. Physicians' perspectives on social competency education in academic medicine. Korean J Med Educ. 2013; 25:289–297.

5. Hwang JB. The human side of medicine. Paju: Korean Studies Information;2012.

6. Jeon WT, Yang EB. Medical humanities and future of the medical education. Seoul: Yonsei University Press;2003.

7. Korea University Research and Business Foundation. A study on research topics and supporting schemes for building social capacities for the medical profession. Cheongwon: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2013.

8. Rourke J. Social accountability in theory and practice. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4:Suppl 1. S45–S48.

9. Meili R, Buchman S. Social accountability: at the heart of family medicine. Can Fam Physician. 2013; 59:335–336.

10. Hennen B. Demonstrating social accountability in medical education. CMAJ. 1997; 156:365–367.

11. Savett LA. The human side of medicine: learning what it's like to be a patient and what it's like to be a physician. Westport: Auburn House;2002.

12. Gunderman RB. Achieving excellence in medical education. New York: Springer;2007.

13. Brandão C, Rego G, Duarte I, Nunes R. Social responsibility: a new paradigm of hospital governance? Health Care Anal. 2013; 21:390–402.

14. Francis CK. Medical ethos and social responsibility in clinical medicine. J Urban Health. 2001; 78:29–45.

15. Waugh D. US medical schools failing social responsibility test, MD says. CMAJ. 1990; 143:1238–1239.

16. World Health Organization. Doctors for health: a WHO global strategy for changing medical education and medical practice for health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization;1996.

17. Meng KH. Medical education plan for the twenty-first century in Korea: hopes and challenges. Korean J Med Educ. 2004; 16:1–11.

18. Ahn DS. A study on assessing current status of continuing education and establishing image of medical doctor in the future. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2013.

19. Jeon WT, Kim SH, Oh SM. Medical humanities and social science. Seoul: Cheongnyeonuisa;2010.

20. Han DS, Cho BH, Bae S, Kim CY, Lee SI, Lee YJ. Professional socialization of medical students. Korean J Prev Med. 1996; 29:265–276.

21. United Nations. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights: adopted and opend for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27 [Internet]. Geneva: United Nations;cited 2014 Feb 7. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx.

22. Kim CY. Theories of health security. Paju: Hanul Publishing Group;2009.

23. General Medical Council. Welcome to medicine 2013: find out what is expected of you as a future doctor [Internet]. Manchester: General Medical Council;2013. cited 2014 Jan 17. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Welcome_to_medicine_2013_0613_52230963.pdf.