J Korean Continence Soc.  2006 Dec;10(2):153-157.

The Efficacy of Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Patients with Large Prostate (over 100 g): Comparison with Open Prostatectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. drwonhee@inha.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Konkuk University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) patients with large prostate greater than 100 g and evaluated the efficacy of TURP compared with open prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From June 1998 to January 2006, all 26 patients with symptomatic BPH patients with large prostate greater than 100 g were entered into the study. 7 patients underwent open prostatectomy (open group) and the other 19 patients underwent TURP(TURP group). The pre-operative evaluation included International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), quality of life(QoL), peak urinary flow rate(Qmax), satisfaction index and transrectal ultrasonography, operation time, weight of resected tissue, postoperative hospital stay and complications were noted.
RESULTS
Between two groups there were no statistically significant differences in pre-operative data. In open group resected tissue was larger than TURP group, however, hospital stay and operation time were longer, and operation-related complications happened more frequently than TURP group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative IPSS, QoL, Qmax and satisfaction index between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Compared with open prostatectomy, TURP can be safely performed for treating symptomatic BPH greater than 100 g in size.

Keyword

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Transurethral resection of the prostate; Open prostatectomy

MeSH Terms

Humans
Length of Stay
Prostate*
Prostatectomy*
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Transurethral Resection of Prostate*
Ultrasonography
Full Text Links
  • JKCS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr