J Korean Surg Soc.  2013 Nov;85(5):236-239.

Comparison of Limberg flap and excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease, in terms of quality of life and complications

• Karaca AS
• Ali R
• Capar M
• Karaca S

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to compare two different treatment methods for pilonidal sinus with respect to complications, recurrence, and patient quality of life.
METHODS
Five hundred forty-nine patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus between January 2007 and August 2012 were included in this study. The patients were classified into group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap).
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the mean age and gender of the patients between groups I and II (P = 0.512 and P = 0.472). The duration of surgical operation was lower in group I (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time after surgery, minor complications, and recurrence between the groups (P = 0.674, P = 1.000, and P = 1.000, respectively). The time required for pain-free walking, urinating, and returning to work was significantly lower in group II (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The patients in group I stated that they were more satisfied in terms of aesthetics (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
According to the results of this study, Limberg flap method has better outcomes compared with excision and primary closure. Therefore, we recommend Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Keyword

Complication; Quality of life; Pilonidal sinus

MeSH Terms

Esthetics
Hospitalization
Humans
Oxalates
Pilonidal Sinus*
Quality of Life*
Recurrence
Surgical Procedures, Minor
Walking
Oxalates

Reference

1. McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 336:868–871.

2. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Bononi M, Fornasari V, Miccini M, Drumo A, et al. Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture. Am J Surg. 2008; 196:28–33.

3. Muzi MG, Milito G, Cadeddu F, Nigro C, Andreoli F, Amabile D, et al. Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010; 200:9–14.

4. Al-Khayat H, Al-Khayat H, Sadeq A, Groof A, Haider HH, Hayati H, et al. Risk factors for wound complication in pilonidal sinus procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205:439–444.

5. Polat C, Gungor B, Karagul S, Buyukakincak S, Topgul K, Erzurumlu K. Is oval flap reconstruction a good modification for treating pilonidal sinuses? Am J Surg. 2011; 201:192–196.

6. Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E, Nazli O, Onal MA. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50:1436–1444.

7. Holmebakk T, Nesbakken A. Surgery for pilonidal disease. Scand J Surg. 2005; 94:43–46.

8. Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg. 2005; 190:388–392.

9. Akca T, Colak T, Ustunsoy B, Kanik A, Aydin S. Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with the Limberg flap in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Br J Surg. 2005; 92:1081–1084.

10. Katsoulis IE, Hibberts F, Carapeti EA. Outcome of treatment of primary and recurrent pilonidal sinuses with the Limberg flap. Surgeon. 2006; 4:7–10.

11. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Alimoglu O, Dasiran F. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap. Surgery. 2003; 134:745–749.

12. Bendewald FP, Cima RR. Pilonidal disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2007; 20:86–95.

13. Nursal TZ, Ezer A, Caliskan K, Torer N, Belli S, Moray G. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010; 199:170–177.

14. Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010; 200:318–327.

15. Ersoy OF, Karaca S, Kayaoglu HA, Ozkan N, Celik A, Ozum T. Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007; 23:67–70.

16. Leventoglu S, Ozdemir S, Ozgay N, Ege B, Mentes B, Oguz M, et al. Comparison of primary closure with Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal disease. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg. 2008; 19:90–92.