J Korean Surg Soc.  2013 Jul;85(1):7-14.

Comparison of neoadjuvant adriamycin and docetaxel versus adriamycin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in patients with operable breast cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. ideakims@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 6Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is increasingly considered for patients with operable disease. Recently, as many clinical trials have demonstrated favorable outcomes of anthracycline-taxane based regimen, this approach has been widely used in the neoadjuvant setting.
METHODS
We compared women who received adriamycine and docetaxel (AD) with adriamycin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (AC-T) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The AD group was scheduled for six cycles of AD (50 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively) at a 3-week interval. The AC-T group was scheduled for four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2 and 500 mg/m2, respectively) followed by four cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) at a 3-week interval.
RESULTS
The responses of chemotherapy were equivalent (overall response rate [AD, 75.7% vs. AC-T, 80.9%; P = 0.566], pathologic complete response [pCR] rate [breast and axilla: AD, 10.8% vs. AC-T, 12.8%; P = 1.000; breast only: AD, 18.9% vs. AC-T, 14.9%, P = 0.623], breast conserving surgery rate [P = 0.487], and breast conserving surgery conversion rate [P = 0.562]). The pCR rate in the breast was higher in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive cases (HER2 positive 33.3% vs. negative 10%, P = 0.002). Although nonhematologic toxicities were comparable, hematologic toxicities were more severe in the AD group. Most women in the AD group suffered from grade 3/4 neutropenia (P < 0.001) and neutropenic fever (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Tumor responses were not different in various variables between the two groups. However, AC-T was a more tolerable regimen than AD in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Neoadjuvant therapy

MeSH Terms

Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Cyclophosphamide
Doxorubicin
Female
Fever
Humans
Mastectomy, Segmental
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neutropenia
Paclitaxel
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2
Taxoids
Cyclophosphamide
Doxorubicin
Paclitaxel
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2
Taxoids

Reference

1. von Minckwitz G, Kummel S, Vogel P, Hanusch C, Eidtmann H, Hilfrich J, et al. Intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-responding breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008. 100:552–562.
2. Bear HD, Anderson S, Smith RE, Geyer CE Jr, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2006. 24:2019–2027.
3. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:4165–4174.
4. Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J, Fisher B, Mamounas E, Wolmark N. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer. 2002. 95:681–695.
5. Cuppone F, Bria E, Carlini P, Milella M, Felici A, Sperduti I, et al. Taxanes as primary chemotherapy for early breast cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cancer. 2008. 113:238–246.
6. Kaufmann M, von Minckwitz G, Bear HD, Buzdar A, McGale P, Bonnefoi H, et al. Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: new perspectives 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007. 18:1927–1934.
7. Gwak G, Kim JY, Park K, Shin YJ, Cho H, Park SJ, et al. Comparison of Doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Doxorubicin plus vinorelbine in primary breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2011. 14:129–134.
8. Jones RL, Salter J, A'Hern R, Nerurkar A, Parton M, Reis-Filho JS, et al. Relationship between oestrogen receptor status and proliferation in predicting response and long-term outcome to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010. 119:315–323.
9. von Minckwitz G, Raab G, Caputo A, Schutte M, Hilfrich J, Blohmer JU, et al. Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:2676–2685.
10. Gradishar WJ, Wedam SB, Jahanzeb M, Erban J, Limentani SA, Tsai KT, et al. Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with stage III breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2005. 16:1297–1304.
11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009. 45:228–247.
12. Bria E, Nistico C, Cuppone F, Carlini P, Ciccarese M, Milella M, et al. Benefit of taxanes as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: pooled analysis of 15,500 patients. Cancer. 2006. 106:2337–2344.
13. Su J, Li MQ, Xu H, Hu D. Clinical comparative study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome in locally advanced breast cancer: docetaxel versus paclitaxel plus pirarubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011. 91:1837–1839.
14. Malhotra V, Dorr VJ, Lyss AP, Anderson CM, Westgate S, Reynolds M, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004. 5:377–384.
15. Espinosa E, Morales S, Borrega P, Casas A, Madroñal C, Machengs I, et al. Docetaxel and high-dose epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004. 54:546–552.
16. Schneeweiss A, Huober J, Sinn HP, von Fournier D, Rudlowski C, Beldermann F, et al. Gemcitabine, epirubicin and docetaxel as primary systemic therapy in patients with early breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase I/II study. Eur J Cancer. 2004. 40:2432–2438.
17. Conte PF, Donati S, Gennari A, Guarneri V, Orlandini C, Rondini M, et al. Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine, epirubicin and taxol (GET) in operable breast cancer: a phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2005. 93:406–411.
18. Mazouni C, Peintinger F, Wan-Kau S, Andre F, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Symmans WF, et al. Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2007. 25:2650–2655.
19. Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, Kuerer H, Sneige N, Buzdar AU, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:9304–9311.
20. Kim JW, Jung SK, Eum T, Koo BY, Kang HJ, Kim LS. Pathologic findings of residual tumor according to the response rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 2008. 75:1–8.
21. Andre F, Mazouni C, Liedtke C, Kau SW, Frye D, Green M, et al. HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. 108:183–190.
22. Wang L, Jiang Z, Sui M, Shen J, Xu C, Fan W. The potential biomarkers in predicting pathologic response of breast cancer to three different chemotherapy regimens: a case control study. BMC Cancer. 2009. 9:226.
23. Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2007. 94:1189–1200.
24. Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. 97:188–194.
25. Buchholz TA, Lehman CD, Harris JR, Pockaj BA, Khouri N, Hylton NF, et al. Statement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute conference. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26:791–797.
26. Han S, Kim SB, Kang SS, Noh WC, Paik NS, Chang ES, et al. A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus doxorubicin (KBCS-01) in stage II, III breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006. 98:57–61.
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr