Results of Surgical Correction in Patients with Vesicoureteral Reflux after Kidney Transplantation

Lee, Jan Dee; Huh, Kyu Ha; Kim, Soon Il; Kim, Yu Seun; Yang, Seung Chul; Park, Kiil

Abstract

PURPOSE
The prevalence and significance of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after kidney transplantation has been varies among authors. While these results suggested that VUR can be a source of repeated infections, which might be a prognostic factor impairing long-term graft function. We evaluated the prevalence, clinical manifestations and diagnostic methods of VUR after living donor kidney transplantation and their proper management with the results of each treatment.
METHODS
We reviewed thirty-four patients among five hundreds and thirteen living donor kidney transplant recipients, who developed VUR after the transplantations at our center from June 1998 to June 2003. Twenty-three patients underwent a corrective surgical procedure, ureteroneocystostomy, and we excluded 3 patients who underwent the procedure less than 1 year. The patients were divided into three groups: those with severe VUR underwent a corrective surgical procedure with more than 1 year follow-up (group I, n=20), those with mild VUR underwent a conservative management (group II, n=8) and control group of patients without VUR (group III, n=20). The incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and graft function were assessed for 1~7 years. Voiding cystoureterography (VCUG) was performed in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections and reflux was classified from Grade I to Grade IV.
RESULTS
We examined immunological and non-immunological risk factors such as age, sex, primary diseases, duration on dialysis, diuresis prior to the treatment, donor selection, the degree of HLA mismatches, cold ischemia time, the incidence of acute rejection. There was no significant demographic difference among study groups except sex (female). Analysis of patients and grafts survival rates revealed no statistical differences among three groups.
CONCLUSION
VUR dose not seem to negatively affect graft function if surgical correction were performed in proper period after the diagnosis. The indication of surgical correction of VUR is clinically significant UTIs, UTI sepsis, Grade III or IV VUR. Close attention, proper diagnosis and prompt surgical correction are necessary to minimize the adverse influence of VUR after kidney transplantation.