Restor Dent Endod.  2015 Feb;40(1):30-36. 10.5395/rde.2015.40.1.30.

A study on the compatibility between one-bottle dentin adhesives and composite resins using micro-shear bond strength

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea. OPERATYS16@yuhs.ac

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
This study was performed to determine whether the combined use of one-bottle self-etch adhesives and composite resins from same manufacturers have better bond strengths than combinations of adhesive and resins from different manufacturers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
25 experimental micro-shear bond test groups were made from combinations of five dentin adhesives and five composite resins with extracted human molars stored in saline for 24 hr. Testing was performed using the wire-loop method and a universal testing machine. Bond strength data was statistically analyzed using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test.
RESULTS
Two way ANOVA revealed significant differences for the factors of dentin adhesives and composite resins, and significant interaction effect (p < 0.001). All combinations with Xeno V (Dentsply De Trey) and Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray Dental) adhesives showed no significant differences in micro-shear bond strength, but other adhesives showed significant differences depending on the composite resin (p < 0.05). Contrary to the other adhesives, Xeno V and BondForce (Tokuyama Dental) had higher bond strengths with the same manufacturer's composite resin than other manufacturer's composite resin.
CONCLUSIONS
Not all combinations of adhesive and composite resin by same manufacturers failed to show significantly higher bond strengths than mixed manufacturer combinations.

Keyword

Compatibility; Micro-shear bone strength; One bottle self-etch adhesive; One-step self-etch adhesive; Resin composite

MeSH Terms

Adhesives*
Composite Resins*
Dentin*
Humans
Molar
Adhesives
Composite Resins

Figure

  • Figure 1 Preparation of specimens for Micro-Shear Bond Strength Tests. (a) Tooth slice; (b) Post-it note placement; (c) Tube; (d) Composite resin filled in the tube; (e) Specimen for micro-shear bond test; (f) Wire-Loop Method (EZ Test, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

  • Figure 2 Micro-shear bond strength plots for the experimental groups and Tukey test results for the interaction between dentin adhesives and composite resins. Horizontal bars indicate that there is no significant difference. (Black arrow) The material groups designated in the box were the combination of the adhesive and the composite resin supplied by the same manufacturer. XV, Xeno V; CD, Ceram X Duo; GB, G-Bond; CS, Clearfil S3 Bond; CH, Charisma; EQ, Estelite Quick; CM, Clearfil Majesty; IB, iBond; GD, Gradia Direct; BF, BondForce.


Reference

1. Asmussen E, Uno S. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentin: chemical and physicochemical aspects. Oper Dent. 1992; Suppl 5. 68–74.
2. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:183–188.
Article
3. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:Suppl. 20S–25S.
Article
4. Perdigao J. New concepts in dental adhesion. Northwest Dent. 2000; 79:29–33.
5. Freedman G, Leinfelder K. Seventh-generation adhesive systems. Dent Today. 2002; 21:106–111.
6. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004; 83:454–458.
Article
7. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res. 2008; 87:757–761.
Article
8. Perdigão J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 1997; 13:218–227.
Article
9. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding to Enamel and Dentin. In : Summitt James B., Robins J. William, Hilton Thomas J., Schwartz Richard S., editors. Fundamentals of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing co, Inc.;2006. p. 193–260.
10. Leirskar J, Oilo G, Nordbø H. In vitro shear bond strength of two resin composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29:787–792.
11. Roh BD, Chung JH. Micro-shear bond strength of five resin-based composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2005; 18:333–337.
12. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater. 1995; 11:117–125.
Article
13. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2000; 16:180–187.
Article
14. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004; 83:454–458.
Article
15. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24:1–13.
Article
16. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3:237–245.
17. Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51:333–357.
Article
18. Koshiro K, Sidhu SK, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H. New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 77:401–408.
Article
19. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28:215–235.
20. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:118–132.
Article
21. Poptani B, Gohil KS, Ganjiwale J, Shukla M. Microtensile dentin bond strength of fifth with five seventh-generation dentin bonding agents after thermocycling: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012; 3:S167–S171.
22. Hegde MN, Hegde P, Bhandary S, Deepika K. An evalution of compressive strength of newer nanocomposite: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14:36–39.
Article
23. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Composite resins in the 21st century. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24:641–658.
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr