Restor Dent Endod.  2013 Nov;38(4):248-252.

Washout resistance of fast-setting pozzolan cement under various root canal irrigants

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University School of Dentistry, Iksan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Periodontology, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry, Jeonju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry, Jeonju, Korea. endomin@gmail.com
  • 4Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Fast-setting pozzolan cement (Endocem, Maruchi) was recently developed. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of various root canal irrigants on the washout of Endocem in comparison to the previously marketed mineral trioxide aggregate (ProRoot; Dentsply) in a furcal perforation model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
ProRoot and Endocem were placed into acrylic molds on moist Oasis. Each mold was then immediately exposed to either physiologic saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), or 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) under gentle shaking for five minutes. Washout testing was performed by scoring scanning electron microscope (SEM) images.
RESULTS
Endocem exhibited higher washout resistance compared to ProRoot, especially in the NaOCl group.
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that Endocem can be considered a useful repair material for furcal perforation, especially in a single-visit scenario.

Keyword

Fast-setting; Furcal; Mineral trioxide aggregate; Perforation; Pozzolan; Washout

MeSH Terms

Acrylic Resins
Aluminum Compounds
Calcium Compounds
Chlorhexidine
Dental Pulp Cavity*
Drug Combinations
Fungi
Oxides
Pyrroles
Root Canal Irrigants*
Silicates
Sodium Hypochlorite
Vinyl Compounds
Acrylic Resins
Aluminum Compounds
Calcium Compounds
Chlorhexidine
Drug Combinations
Oxides
Pyrroles
Root Canal Irrigants
Silicates
Sodium Hypochlorite
Vinyl Compounds

Figure

  • Figure 1 (a) Schematic of the model used for the experiment; (b) Washout scores of ProRoot (PR) and Endocem (EC). Each point and bar represents the mean ± SD. The capital letters represent significant differences between ProRoot and Endocem for each root canal irrigant, and the lowercase letters represent significant differences between root canal irrigants for each repair material. SLN, physiologic saline; NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite; CHX, chlorhexidine.

  • Figure 2 SEM observation indicating the washout tendency of ProRoot (a - c) and Endocem (d - f) in the presence of various root canal irrigants (×30). SLN, physiologic saline (a and d); NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite (b and e); CHX, chlorhexidine (c and f). White arrowheads indicate the areas where wash-out happened.

  • Figure 3 SEM observation indicating the microstructure of ProRoot (a - c) and Endocem (d - f) in the presence of various root canal irrigants (×2,000). SLN, physiologic saline (a and d); NaOCl, sodium hypochlorite (b and e); CHX, chlorhexidine (c and f).


Reference

1. Pace R, Giuliani V, Pagavino G. Mineral trioxide aggregate as repair material for furcal perforation: case series. J Endod. 2008; 34:1130–1133.
Article
2. Ferris DM, Baumgartner JC. Perforation repair comparing two types of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2004; 30:422–424.
Article
3. Shahi S, Rahimi S, Hasan M, Shiezadeh V, Abdolrahimi M. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement for furcal perforation repair: a protein leakage study. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51:601–606.
Article
4. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010; 36:16–27.
Article
5. Choi Y, Park SJ, Lee SH, Hwang YC, Yu MK, Min KS. Biological effects and washout resistance of a newly developed fast-setting pozzolan cement. J Endod. 2013; 39:467–472.
Article
6. Hardy I, Liewehr FR, Joyce AP, Agee K, Pashley DH. Sealing ability of One-Up Bond and MTA with and without a secondary seal as furcation perforation repair materials. J Endod. 2004; 30:658–661.
Article
7. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review-Part III: Clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod. 2010; 36:400–413.
Article
8. Biswas M, Mazumdar D, Neyogi A. Non surgical perforation repair by mineral trioxide aggregate under dental operating microscope. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14:83–85.
Article
9. Unal GC, Maden M, Isidan T. Repair of furcal iatrogenic perforation with mineral trioxide aggregate: two years follow-up of two cases. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4:475–481.
Article
10. Guneser MB, Akbulut MB, Eldeniz AU. Effect of various endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond strength of biodentine and conventional root perforation repair materials. J Endod. 2013; 39:380–384.
Article
11. Wiltbank KB, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Effect of selected accelerants on the physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. J Endod. 2007; 33:1235–1238.
Article
12. Kogan P, He J, Glickman GN, Watanabe I. The effects of various additives on setting properties of MTA. J Endod. 2006; 32:569–572.
Article
13. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM. The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endod. 2009; 35:550–554.
Article
14. AlAnezi AZ, Zhu Q, Wang YH, Safavi KE, Jiang J. Effect of selected accelerants on setting time and biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 111:122–127.
Article
15. Lee BN, Hwang YC, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang IN, Yang SY, Park YJ, Son HH, Oh WM. Improvement of the properties of mineral trioxide aggregate by mixing with hydration accelerators. J Endod. 2011; 37:1433–1436.
Article
16. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Di Silvio L, Pitt Ford TR. The chemical constitution and biocompatibility of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endod J. 2005; 38:834–842.
Article
17. Uyanik MO, Nagas E, Sahin C, Dagli F, Cehreli ZC. Effects of different irrigation regimens on the sealing properties of repaired furcal perforations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:e91–e95.
Article
18. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Sener B, Waltimo T. Tissue-dissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 94:756–762.
Article
19. Saghiri MA, Shokouhinejad N, Lotfi M, Aminsobhani M, Saghiri AM. Push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of alkaline pH. J Endod. 2010; 36:1856–1859.
Article
20. Shokouhinejad N, Nekoofar MH, Iravani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Dummer PM. Effect of acidic environment on the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010; 36:871–874.
Article
21. Chang SW. Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction. Restor Dent Endod. 2012; 37:188–193.
Article
22. Hong ST, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Shon WJ, Lee W. Effects of root canal irrigants on the push-out strength and hydration behavior of accelerated mineral trioxide aggregate in its early setting phase. J Endod. 2010; 36:1995–1999.
Article
Full Text Links
  • RDE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr