Korean J Urol.  2013 Apr;54(4):249-251.

Homogeneity Among the Korean International Prostate Symptom Score Questionnaires Used in Real Practice

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. wonjya@schmc.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
We analyzed whether any problems existed in terms of the homogeneity of the Korean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire used in real practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between July 2012 and August 2012, 48 Korean IPSS questionnaires used in real practice were collected. All the items on the questionnaire, including the quality of life (QoL) questions, were compared and we then determined the homogeneity of each question in comparison with the originally validated Korean version of the IPSS from 1996.
RESULTS
Only 5 of 48 sources (10.4%) of the Korean IPSS totally corresponded with the original Korean version of the IPSS questionnaire. The consistency rate with the originally validated version was generally low for the answer choice items for each question, ranging from 16.6% for "less than half the time" to 35.4% for "almost always," with the exception of the item "not at all" (100.0%). The consistency rate was 60.4% for question 3 (intermittency) and 18.8% for question 6 (straining). No homogeneity was found in any of the QoL-related questions. The average consistency rate with the originally validated version was 42.2% and ranged from 22.9% for "unhappy" to the highest rate of 95.8% for "mostly satisfied."
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with the originally validated Korean version of the IPSS, various Korean IPSS questionnaires used in real practice had significant problems in terms of homogeneity for both the questions and the answer choice items. Efforts are needed to ensure the uniform use of the validated Korean version of the IPSS questionnaire.

Keyword

Questionnaires; Reproducibility of results

MeSH Terms

Dietary Sucrose
Prostate
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Dietary Sucrose

Reference

1. Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, et al. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 1992. 148:1549–1557.
2. Choi HR, Chung WS, Shim BS, Kwon SW, Hong SJ, Chung BH, et al. Translation validity and reliability of I-PSS Korean version. Korean J Urol. 1996. 37:659–665.
3. Helsing KJ, Comstock GW. Response variation and location of questions within a questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol. 1976. 5:125–130.
4. Kim SJ, Kim WJ, Kim CI, Kim CS, Kim HJ, Lee ES, et al. Korean Urological Association. Urologic neoplasm. Textbook of urology. 2007. 4th ed. Seoul: Iljogak;314.
5. Lee HM. Korean Prostate Society. Benign prostate hyperplasia. Textbook of benign prostatic hyperplasia. 2004. Seoul: Iljogak;132–135.
6. Son HC. Korean Continence Society. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Textbook of voiding dysfunction and female urology. 2009. 2nd ed. Seoul: Iljogak;217.
7. Park HY. Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology. Prostatic disease. Textbook of andrology. 2010. 2nd ed. Seoul: Gunja;613.
8. Leung WC. Conducting a survey: explains how to conduct a good survey. Stud BMJ. 2001. 9:129–170.
9. Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singapore Med J. 2001. 42:131–135.
10. Schuman H, Presser S. The open and closed question. Am Sociol Rev. 1979. 44:692–712.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr