Korean J Urol.  2012 Aug;53(8):519-523.

Cost Aspects of Radical Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Korea: Open, Laparoscopic, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic, and Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy Surgeries

• Park JW
• Choi KH
• Yang SC
• Han WK

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four different types of radical nephrectomy (RN) techniques: open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted laparoscopic, and video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among patients who were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma and underwent RN, 20 patients were selected who received open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted laparoscopic, or VAMS RN between January 2008 and December 2010. Their medical fees were divided into four categories: procedure and operation, anesthesia, laboratory test, and medical supply fees. The medical costs of the patients were also divided into insured and uninsured costs.
RESULTS
The total direct cost of VAMS, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic RN were 2,023,791+/-240,757, 2,024,246+/-674,859 (p=0.998), 3,603,557+/-870,333 (p<0.01), and 8,021,902+/-330,157 (p<0.01) Korean Won (KRW, the currency of South Koea), respectively. The total insured cost of VAMS, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic RN was 1,904,627+/-231,957, 1,798,127+/-645,602 (p=0.634), 3,039,769+/-711,792 (p<0.01), and 899,668+/-323,508 (p<0.01) KRW, respectively. The total uninsured cost of VAMS, open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic RN was 119,163+/-24,581, 226,119+/-215,009, 563,788+/-487,798 (p<0.01), and 7,122,234+/-56,117 (p<0.01) KRW, respectively. Medical supply fees accounted for the largest portion of the costs and amounted to 33.43% of the VAMS cost.
CONCLUSIONS
VAMS RN is as cost-effective as open surgery. Furthermore, it is comparatively more cost-effective than laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic RN.

Keyword

Cost analysis; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Nephrectomy; Operative surgical procedures

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Costs and Cost Analysis
Fees and Charges
Fees, Medical
Humans
Laparotomy
Medically Uninsured
Nephrectomy
Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive
Surgical Procedures, Operative

Figure

• 

  FIG. 1 Percentage of total cost by category.

Reference

1. Wickham JE. The new surgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987. 295:1581–1582.

2. Yang SC, Park DS, Lee DH, Lee JM, Park K. Retroperitoneal endoscopic live donor nephrectomy: report of 3 cases. J Urol. 1995. 153:1884–1886.

3. Choi KH, Yang SC, Lee SR, Jeon HG, Kim DS, Joo DJ, et al. Standardized video-assisted retroperitoneal minilaparotomy surgery for 615 living donor nephrectomies. Transpl Int. 2011. 24:973–983.

4. Kim DJ, Rha KH, Yang SC. Clinical experience of video-assisted minilaparotomy radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 2003. 44:959–963.

5. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010. 57:453–458.

6. Hamidi V, Andersen MH, Oyen O, Mathisen L, Fosse E, Kristiansen IS. Cost effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2009. 87:831–838.

7. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging manual. 2010. 7th ed. New York: Springer.

8. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 1991. 324:1370–1371.

9. Mues AC, Haramis G, Rothberg MB, Okhunov Z, Casazza C, Landman J. Contemporary experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011. 21:15–18.

10. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, Vallancien G. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol. 2001. 166:200–201.

11. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Porter JR, Buffi NM, Figenshau RS, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol. 2010. 57:815–820.

12. Yang SC, Lee DH, Rha KH, Park K. Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: two cases. Transplant Proc. 1994. 26:2409.

13. Berger A, Kamoi K, Gill IS, Aron M. Cryoablation for renal tumors: current status. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. 19:138–142.

14. Yang SC, Han WK, Rha KH, Lee SR, Jeon HG. Video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery. 2009. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.

15. Han WK, Lee HY, Jeon HG, Joo DJ, Rha KH, Yang SC. Quality of life comparison between open and retroperitoneal video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery for kidney donors. Transplant Proc. 2010. 42:1479–1483.

16. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008. 72:1068–1072.

17. Hwang HH, Park RJ, Cheon SH. The early experience of video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS). Korean J Urol. 2007. 48:158–162.

18. Berger A, Crouzet S, Canes D, Haber GP, Gill IS. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. 18:462–466.

19. Lee SY, Choi JD, Seo SI. Current status of partial nephrectomy for renal mass. Korean J Urol. 2011. 52:301–309.