Korean J Urol.  2011 Jun;52(6):384-389.

Renal Function and Oncologic Outcomes after Cryoablation or Partial Nephrectomy for Tumors in Solitary Kidneys

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. rrodrig@jhmi.edu
  • 2Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Preservation of renal function is of paramount importance in patients with tumors in solitary kidneys. We compared the renal function and oncologic outcomes of patients treated by partial nephrectomy with those of patients treated by cryoablation for solitary kidney tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients with solitary kidneys who were treated for renal tumors at our institution between 1997 and 2007 were included in the screen. We retrospectively identified 23 patients who underwent cryoablation and 15 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy.
RESULTS
The two groups were similar with regard to age, gender, and tumor laterality. Patients in the partial nephrectomy group had a larger tumor size (3.4 cm vs. 2.5 cm, p=0.01), higher mean estimated blood loss (316 cc vs. 87 cc, p<0.001), longer duration of hospital stay (5.8 vs. 1.8 days, p<0.001), and a higher rate of perioperative complications (53.3% vs. 8.7% patients, p=0.03). Percentage changes in the glomerular filtration rate postoperatively and on follow-up were found to be similar in the two groups. Both the cryoablation and the partial nephrectomy groups with mean follow-ups of 31.2 months and 30.8 months, respectively, had evidence of local or distant recurrence in 3 patients each (13% and 20% respectively, p=0.7). Both groups had a similar mean overall survival (88.9 and 86.9 months in the cryoablation and partial nephrectomy groups, respectively, p=0.8).
CONCLUSIONS
For tumors in solitary kidneys, renal functional and clinical outcomes for cryoablation were not significantly different from those for partial nephrectomy. However, cryoablation has the distinct advantage of a lower morbidity rate and can be preferentially offered to selected cases.

Keyword

Cryosurgery; Kidney; Nephrectomy

MeSH Terms

Cryosurgery
Follow-Up Studies
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Imidazoles
Kidney
Length of Stay
Nephrectomy
Nitro Compounds
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Imidazoles
Nitro Compounds

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Kaplan-Meier estimated mean overall survival curves after cryoablation and partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors in solitary kidneys (log rank test p=0.8).


Reference

1. Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H, Blute ML. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol. 2002. 168:454–459.
2. Saranchuk JW, Touijer AK, Hakimian P, Snyder ME, Russo P. Partial nephrectomy for patients with a solitary kidney: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. BJU Int. 2004. 94:1323–1328.
3. Fergany AF, Saad IR, Woo L, Novick AC. Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases. J Urol. 2006. 175:1630–1633.
4. Davol PE, Fulmer BR, Rukstalis DB. Long-term results of cryoablation for renal cancer and complex renal masses. Urology. 2006. 68:1 Suppl. 2–6.
5. Aron M, Kamoi K, Remer E, Berger A, Desai M, Gill I. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol. 2010. 183:889–895.
6. Mues AC, Landman J. Results of kidney tumor cryoablation: renal function preservation and oncologic efficacy. World J Urol. 2010. 28:565–570.
7. Shingleton WB, Sewell PE Jr. Cryoablation of renal tumours in patients with solitary kidneys. BJU Int. 2003. 92:237–239.
8. Gill IS, Novick AC, Soble JJ, Sung GT, Remer EM, Hale J, et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: initial clinical series. Urology. 1998. 52:543–551.
9. Uchida M, Imaide Y, Sugimoto K, Uehara H, Watanabe H. Percutaneous cryosurgery for renal tumours. Br J Urol. 1995. 75:132–136.
10. Delworth MG, Pisters LL, Fornage BD, von Eschenbach AC. Cryotherapy for renal cell carcinoma and angiomyolipoma. J Urol. 1996. 155:252–254.
11. Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Annu Rev Med. 2002. 53:393–407.
12. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002. 167:469–467.
13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987. 40:373–383.
14. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate Glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. A new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999. 130:461–470.
15. Park H, Byun SS, Kim HH, Lee SB, Kwon TG, Jeon SH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a Korean multicenter experience. Korean J Urol. 2010. 51:467–471.
16. Lane BR, Babineau DC, Poggio ED, Weight CJ, Larson BT, Gill IS, et al. Factors predicting renal functional outcome after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008. 180:2363–2368.
17. Beri A, Lattouf JB, Deambros O, Grüll M, Gschwendtner M, Ziegerhofer J, et al. Partial nephrectomy using renal artery perfusion for cold ischemia: functional and oncologic outcomes. J Endourol. 2008. 22:1285–1290.
18. Inoue Y, Kurimoto S, Kameyama S, Ohta N, Akahane M, Yoshikawa K, et al. Prolonged renal parenchymal retention of 99mTc mercaptoacetyltriglycine after nephron-sparing surgery. Nucl Med Commun. 2004. 25:509–513.
19. Janetschek G, Daffner P, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1998. 159:1152–1155.
20. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Fergany A, Frank I, et al. Comparison of warm ischemia vs. no ischemia during partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney. Eur Urol. 2010. 58:331–336.
21. Ham BK, Kang SG, Choi H, Ko YH, Kang SH, Cheon J. The impact of renal tumor size on the efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Korean J Urol. 2010. 51:171–177.
22. Campbell SC, Novick AC. Surgical technique and morbidity of elective partial nephrectomy. Semin Urol Oncol. 1995. 13:281–287.
23. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004. 351:1296–1305.
24. Poggio ED, Nef PC, Wang X, Greene T, Van Lente F, Dennis VW, et al. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease equations in estimating GFR in ill-hospitalized patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005. 46:242–252.
25. Levey AS, Lesley AS, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009. 150:604–612.
26. Matsushita K, Selvin E, Bash LD, Astor BC, Coresh J. Risk implications of the new CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation compared with the MDRD Study equation for estimated GFR: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010. 55:648–659.
27. Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology. 2005. 66:5 Suppl. 23–28.
28. O'Malley RL, Berger AD, Kanofsky JA, Phillips CK, Stifelman M, Taneja SS. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses. BJU Int. 2007. 99:395–398.
29. Turna B, Kaouk JH, Frota R, Stein RJ, Kamoi K, Gill IS, et al. Minimally invasive nephron sparing management for renal tumors in solitary kidneys. J Urol. 2009. 182:2150–2157.
30. Sidana A, Agarwal P, Feng Z, Georgiades CS, Trock BJ, Rodriguez R. Complications of renal cryoablation: a single center experience. J Urol. 2010. 184:42–47.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr