Nutr Res Pract.  2013 Feb;7(1):49-58.

Development of a Korean Diet Score (KDS) and its application assessing adherence to Korean healthy diet based on the Korean Food Guide Wheels

• Lee M
• Chae SW
• Cha YS
• Cho MS
• Oh HY
• Kim MK

Abstract

The most critical point in the assessment of adherence to dietary guidelines is the development of a practical definition for adherence, such as a dietary pattern score. The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean Diet Score (KDS) based on the Korean Food Balance Wheel and to examine the association of KDS with various lifestyle characteristics and biochemical factors. The dietary data of 5,320 subjects from the 4th Korean National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey were used for the final analysis. The food guide was composed of six food group categories; 'grain dishes', 'fish and meat dishes', 'vegetable dishes', 'fruits', 'milk' and 'oils and sugars'. Based on the recommended serving numbers for each group, the scores measuring adherence to this food guide were calculated from the dietary information from the 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire, and then its correlation with various characteristics was assessed. KDS was significantly associated with several clinical, lifestyle and socioeconomic factors as well as diagnosed disease history. The higher quintile group of KDS showed a significantly lower level in fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, current smoking and drinking as well as higher leisure time activity, house income and education. Furthermore, the KDS quintile group of women was inversely associated with hypertension, osteoporosis and diabetes. A higher KDS quintile was characterized with a higher intake of several critical nutrients, such as Ca, Fe and vitamins as well as a desirable nutrition balance such as the ratio of macronutrients. Our results demonstrate that KDS is a beneficial tool in assessing the adherence to a healthy diet based on the Korean dietary guidelines. We suggest that KDS could be a useful indicator for evaluating the dietary balance of the Korean population.

Keyword

KDS; KNHANES; dietary guidelines; dietary patterns; Korea

MeSH Terms

Blood Glucose
Blood Pressure
Diet
Drinking
Fasting
Female
Humans
Hypertension
Korea
Leisure Activities
Life Style
Meat
Osteoporosis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Smoke
Smoking
Socioeconomic Factors
Triglycerides
Vitamins
Blood Glucose
Smoke
Triglycerides
Vitamins

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 The Korean Food Balance Wheels (Source: Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. First Revision, 2010. The Korean Nutrition Society)

Reference

1. Jacobs DR Jr, Tapsell LC. Food, not nutrients, is the fundamental unit in nutrition. Nutr Rev. 2007. 65:439–450.

2. Moeller SM, Reedy J, Millen AE, Dixon LB, Newby PK, Tucker KL, Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM. Dietary patterns: challenges and opportunities in dietary patterns research an Experimental Biology workshop, April 1, 2006. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007. 107:1233–1239.

3. Wirt A, Collins CE. Diet quality--what is it and does it matter? Public Health Nutr. 2009. 12:2473–2492.

4. Kant AK. Indexes of overall diet quality: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996. 96:785–791.

5. Arvaniti F, Panagiotakos DB. Healthy indexes in public health practice and research: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008. 48:317–327.

6. Waijers PM, Feskens EJ, Ocké MC. A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr. 2007. 97:219–231.

7. Kourlaba G, Panagiotakos DB. Dietary quality indices and human health: a review. Maturitas. 2009. 62:1–8.

8. Weinstein SJ, Vogt TM, Gerrior SA. Healthy Eating Index scores are associated with blood nutrient concentrations in the third National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004. 104:576–584.

9. Boynton A, Neuhouser ML, Wener MH, Wood B, Sorensen B, Chen-Levy Z, Kirk EA, Yasui Y, Lacroix K, McTiernan A, Ulrich CM. Associations between healthy eating patterns and immune function or inflammation in overweight or obese postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007. 86:1445–1455.

10. Kant AK, Graubard BI. A comparison of three dietary pattern indexes for predicting biomarkers of diet and disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2005. 24:294–303.

11. Alberti A, Fruttini D, Fidanza F. The Mediterranean Adequacy Index: further confirming results of validity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009. 19:61–66.

12. Reedy J, Mitrou PN, Krebs-Smith SM, Wirfält E, Flood A, Kipnis V, Leitzmann M, Mouw T, Hollenbeck A, Schatzkin A, Subar AF. Index-based dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008. 168:38–48.

13. Fung TT, Hu FB, McCullough ML, Newby PK, Willett WC, Holmes MD. Diet quality is associated with the risk of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Nutr. 2006. 136:466–472.

14. Basiotis PP, Carlson A, Gerrior SA, Juan WY, Lino M. The Healthy Eating Index: 1999-2000. 2002. Alexandria: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.

15. Drewnowski A. Concept of a nutritious food: toward a nutrient density score. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005. 82:721–732.

16. Ludwig DS. The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2002. 287:2414–2423.

17. Kim YO, Kim MK, Lee SA, Yoon YM, Sasaki S. A study testing the usefulness of a dish-based food-frequency questionnaire developed for epidemiological studies in Korea. Br J Nutr. 2009. 101:1218–1227.

18. The Korean Nutrition Society. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. 2010. 1st revision. Seoul: The Korean Nutrition Society.

19. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002. 76:1261–1271.

20. Kim S, Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) provides an effective tool for cross-national comparison of diet quality as illustrated by China and the United States. J Nutr. 2003. 133:3476–3484.

21. Hann CS, Rock CL, King I, Drewnowski A. Validation of the Healthy Eating Index with use of plasma biomarkers in a clinical sample of women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001. 74:479–486.

22. Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994. 94:57–64.

23. Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. The Diet Quality Index revised: a measurement instrument for populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999. 99:697–704.

24. Kennedy ET, Ohls J, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995. 95:1103–1108.

25. Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:2599–2608.

26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 2005. 6th edition. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

27. Kant AK. Dietary patterns: biomarkers and chronic disease risk. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010. 35:199–206.