Nutr Res Pract.  2012 Jun;6(3):263-269.

Educational attainment and differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among middle-aged adults in the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 137-791, Korea. kmkkim@hanyang.ac.kr
  • 2Institute for Community Health, Hanyang University, Haengdang 1-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 137-791, Korea.

Abstract

We investigated whether socioeconomic differences affect fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption with respect to total intake and intake of various FV subgroups. Our study included 6667 adults aged 40-64 years who completed a dietary survey in the fourth Korean NHANES (2007-2009). FV intake was estimated from 24-hour recalls and food frequency questionnaires. Differences in FV consumption related to educational attainment were analyzed according to different nutritional categories of FV. Both men and women in the low-education group had the lowest intake of total FV and total fruits, and women also had the lowest intake of total vegetables. Also lowest in this group was consumption of mushrooms and vegetables (excluding kimchi) among men, and cruciferous and allium vegetables (excluding Chinese cabbage and radish) among women, while kimchi consumption was the highest in this group. Additionally, an association between educational level and intake of citrus fruits was evident among men. Adults in the low-education group consumed less carotene-rich FV, red fruit and/or vegetables, and dark-green leafy vegetables, fewer total vegetable dishes, and fewer types of fruit than in other groups. Men in this group had the lowest intake of yellow/orange fruit and/or vegetables, and women consumed the least folate-rich FV. There is a clear association between educational attainment and FV intake with regard to total intake, and to specific nutrients, bioactive compounds, colors, and variety.

Keyword

Fruit and vegetables (FV); educational level

MeSH Terms

Adult
Agaricales
Aged
Allium
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Brassica
Citrus
Female
Fruit
Humans
Male
Nutrition Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vegetables

Reference

1. Borrell C, Rue M, Pasarín MI, Rohlfs I, Ferrando J, Fernandez E. Trends in social class inequalities in health status, health-related behaviors, and health services utilization in a Southern European urban area (1983-1994). Prev Med. 2000. 31:691–701.
Article
2. James WP, Nelson M, Ralph A, Leather S. Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ. 1997. 314:1545–1549.
Article
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint of WHO and FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series . 2003. Geneva: WHO.
4. Smith GD, Brunner E. Socio-economic differentials in health: the role of nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc. 1997. 56:75–90.
Article
5. Satheannoppakao W, Aekplakorn W, Pradipasen M. Fruit and vegetable consumption and its recommended intake associated with sociodemographic factors: Thailand National Health Examination Survey III. Public Health Nutr. 2009. 12:2192–2198.
Article
6. Kwon JH, Shim JE, Park MK, Paik HY. Evaluation of fruits and vegetables intake for prevention of chronic disease in Korean adults aged 30 years and over: using the third Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III), 2005. Korean J Nutr. 2009. 42:146–157.
Article
7. Kanungsukkasem U, Ng N, Van Minh H, Razzaque A, Ashraf A, Juvekar S, Masud Ahmed S, Huu Bich T. Fruit and vegetable consumption in rural adults population in INDEPTH HDSS sites in Asia. Glob Health Action. 2009. 2:doi: 10.3402/gha.v2i0.1988.
Article
8. Estaquio C, Druesne-Pecollo N, Latino-Martel P, Dauchet L, Hercberg S, Bertrais S. Socioeconomic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among middle-aged French adults: adherence to the 5 A Day recommendation. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008. 108:2021–2030.
Article
9. Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R, Hu FB, Hunter D, Smith-Warner SA, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. 96:1577–1584.
Article
10. Takachi R, Inoue M, Ishihara J, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Iso H, Tsubono Y, Tsugane S. JPHC Study Group. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of total cancer and cardiovascular disease: Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008. 167:59–70.
Article
11. Pennington JA, Fisher RA. Classification of fruits and vegetables. J Food Compost Anal. 2009. 22:Suppl. S23–S31.
Article
12. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Vainio H, Bianchini F, editors. Fruits and vegetables. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. 2003. Vol 8. Lyon: IARC Press.
13. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B. Socioeconomic differences among Australian adults in consumption of fruit and vegetables and intakes of vitamins A, C and folate. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2002. 15:375–385.
Article
14. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B. Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutr. 2002. 5:663–669.
Article
15. Joshipura KJ, Hung HC, Li TY, Hu FB, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Willett WC. Intakes of fruits, vegetables and carbohydrate and the risk of CVD. Public Health Nutr. 2009. 12:115–121.
Article
16. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996. 96:1027–1039.
17. Bhupathiraju SN, Tucker KL. Greater variety in fruit and vegetable intake is associated with lower inflammation in Puerto Rican adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011. 93:37–46.
Article
18. Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988. 10:87–121.
Article
19. Turrell G, Kavanagh AM. Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour. Public Health Nutr. 2006. 9:375–383.
Article
20. Hong SA, Kim K, Nam SJ, Kong G, Kim MK. A case-control study on the dietary intake of mushrooms and breast cancer risk among Korean women. Int J Cancer. 2008. 122:919–923.
Article
21. Teas J, Baldeón ME, Chiriboga DE, Davis JR, Sarriés AJ, Braverman LE. Could dietary seaweed reverse the metabolic syndrome? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2009. 18:145–154.
22. Yang YJ, Nam SJ, Kong G, Kim MK. A case-control study on seaweed consumption and the risk of breast cancer. Br J Nutr. 2010. 103:1345–1353.
Article
23. Van Duyn MA, Pivonka E. Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000. 100:1511–1521.
Article
24. Rahman K. Historical perspective on garlic and cardiovascular disease. J Nutr. 2001. 131:977S–979S.
Article
25. Zhang X, Shu XO, Xiang YB, Yang G, Li H, Gao J, Cai H, Gao YT, Zheng W. Cruciferous vegetable consumption is associated with a reduced risk of total and cardiovascular disease mortality. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011. 94:240–246.
Article
26. Mizrahi A, Knekt P, Montonen J, Laaksonen MA, Heliövaara M, Järvinen R. Plant foods and the risk of cerebrovascular diseases: a potential protection of fruit consumption. Br J Nutr. 2009. 102:1075–1083.
Article
27. National Rural Resources Development Institute. Food Composition Table. 2006. Suwon: National Rural Resources Development Institute.
28. Billson H, Pryer JA, Nichols R. Variation in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in Britain. An analysis from the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999. 53:946–952.
Article
29. Bhupathiraju SN, Tucker KL. Greater variety in fruit and vegetable intake is associated with lower inflammation in Puerto Rican adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011. 93:37–46.
Article
30. Ness AR, Powles JW. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int J Epidemiol. 1997. 26:1–13.
Article
31. Darmon N, Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. 87:1107–1117.
Article
32. Turrell G, Hewitt B, Patterson C, Oldenburg B, Gould T. Socioeconomic differences in food purchasing behaviour and suggested implications for diet-related health promotion. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2002. 15:355–364.
Article
33. Turrell G, Hewitt B, Patterson C, Oldenburg B. Measuring socioeconomic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? Public Health Nutr. 2003. 6:191–200.
Article
34. Kang KJ, Chung MS. A survey on housewives' consumption pattern and nutrition knowledge about vegetables. Korean J Diet Cult. 1995. 10:377–390.
35. Kim HK. Influence of age and education on food consumption and nutrient intakes of older women living alone. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2001. 11:82–88.
36. Worsley A. Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour? Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002. 11:Suppl 3. S579–S585.
Article
37. Leganger A, Kraft P. Control constructs: Do they mediate the relation between educational attainment and health behaviour? J Health Psychol. 2003. 8:361–372.
Article
38. Inglis V, Ball K, Crawford D. Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration. Appetite. 2005. 45:334–343.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr