Korean J Urol.  2008 Sep;49(9):781-785.

Pathologic Features of Renal Masses, 4cm or Less in Diameter: The Prevalence of Benign Tumors

• Choo SH
• Chung JW
• Kim JY
• Kwak KW
• Seo SI
• Jeon SS
• Choi HY
• Lee HM

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the clinical and pathologic findings of small renal masses that were suspected to be malignant. We investigated the prevalence and the predictors of benign tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent surgeries for renal lesions between September 1994 and June 2007. We analyzed the pathologic reports and medical records of 586 patients who had a renal mass that was 4cm or less. The mean patient age was 53 years(age range: 15-82). There were 418 male patients(71.3%) and 168 females(28.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to determine the clinical factors associated with benign renal masses, including the radiological tumor size, a cystic versus solid appearance, gender, age and the presenting symptoms.
RESULTS
Of the 586 renal masses, 62(10.6%) were benign, 520(88.7%) were renal cell carcinoma and 4(0.7%) were other malignancies. The proportion of benign lesions was significantly higher in the females than that in the males(21.4% vs. 6.2%, respectively, p<001) and the proportion of benign lesions was significantly higher for the smaller masses(0-2cm) than for the 2.1-4cm sized tumors(14.7% vs. 9.1%, respectively, p=0.048). On multivariate analysis, gender and tumor size were significantly associated with malignant histology with the males having an odds ratio(OR) of 4.16 (95% CI 2.41-7.19, p<0.001) and the tumor size more than 2cm having an OR of 1.93(95% CI 1.08-3.44, p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
A considerable number(10.6%) of benign lesions 4cm or less in the radiological diameter were operated on based on suspicious preoperative imaging. The results of this study seem to help not only for counseling the patients, but also for deciding on a therapeutic modality preoperatively.

Keyword

Kidney neoplasms; Nephrectomy; Pathology

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Counseling
Female
Humans
Kidney Neoplasms
Logistic Models
Male
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Nephrectomy
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies

Reference

1. Lee HW, Cho KS, Jeong H, Yoon SJ, Jo MK, Lee ES, et al. Clinical analysis of incidentally found renal cell carcinoma: experiences of recent 8 years. Korean J Urol. 1998. 39:982–987.

2. Seong BM, Kim DS, Yoon DK. Clinical characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 1997. 38:245–249.

3. Rhew HY, Kang JS, Jo SS, Lee CK. Clinical characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: incidentaloma. Korean J Urol. 2000. 41:1195–1201.

4. Shintaku I, Suzuki Y, Uchi K, Morita M, Terasawa Y. Characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma by ultrasonography at health check-up. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2000. 91:43–48.

5. Jayson M, Sanders H. Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 1998. 51:203–205.

6. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C. Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982-1997). Urology. 2000. 56:58–62.

7. Silver DA, Morash C, Brenner P, Campbell S, Russo P. Pathologic findings at the time of nephrectomy for renal mass. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997. 4:570–574.

8. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol. 2003. 170:2217–2220.

9. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, Tuncali K, Cibas ES. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology. 2006. 240:6–22.

10. Eggener SE, Rubenstein JN, Smith ND, Nadler RB, Kontak J, Flanigan RC, et al. Renal tumors in young adults. J Urol. 2004. 171:106–110.

11. Snyder ME, Bach A, Kattan MW, Raj GV, Reuter VE, Russo P. Incidence of benign lesions for clinically localized renal masses smaller than 7cm in radiological diameter: influence of sex. J Urol. 2006. 176:2391–2395.

12. Storkel S, Eble JN, Adlakha K, Amin M, Blute ML, Bostwick DG, et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup No. 1. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer. 1997. 80:987–989.

13. Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ, Bugert P, Cooper CS, Delahunt B, et al. The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol. 1997. 183:131–133.

14. Cooperberg MR, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Villalta JD, Carroll PR, Kane CJ. Decreasing size at diagnosis of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma: analysis from the National Cancer Data Base, 1993 to 2004. J Urol. 2008. 179:2131–2135.

15. Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB. Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol. 2006. 176:1317–1320.

16. Duchene DA, Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Sagalowsky AI, Koeneman KS. Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series. Urology. 2003. 62:827–830.

17. Glassman D, Chawla SN, Waldman I, Johannes J, Byrne DS, Trabulsi EJ, et al. Correlation of pathology with tumor size of renal masses. Can J Urol. 2007. 14:3616–3620.

18. Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000. 75:1236–1242.

19. McKiernan J, Simmons R, Katz J, Russo P. Natural history of chronic renal insufficiency after partial and radical nephrectomy. Urology. 2002. 59:816–820.