J Clin Neurol.  2009 Dec;5(4):173-177. 10.3988/jcn.2009.5.4.173.

Validity and Reliability of the Greek Version of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality-of-Life Questionnaire

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. nik.triantaf@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Neurology, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • 3Department of Neurology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
There are no data regarding psychometrically validated, health-related quality-of-life instruments designed specifically for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Greece. Recently, the MS International Quality-of-Life questionnaire (MusiQoL), a multidimensional, self-administered questionnaire, which is available in 14 languages (including Greek), has been validated using a large international sample. We investigated the validity and reliability of the Greek version of the MusiQoL. METHODS: Consecutive patients with different types and severities of MS were recruited from two tertiary-care centers in Greece. All patients completed the MusiQoL, the Short-Form-36 quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36), and a symptom checklist at baseline and 21+/-7 days (mean+/-SD) later. Data regarding sociodemographic status, MS history, and functional outcome were also collected prospectively. Construct validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, and external consistency were tested. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients was evaluated. The construct validity was confirmed in terms of satisfactory item-internal consistency correlations and scaling success (87.5-100%) of item-discriminant validity. The dimensions of the MusiQoL exhibited high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.63-0.96), and reproducibility was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.69-0.99). External validity testing indicated that the MusiQoL correlated significantly with all SF-36 dimension scores (Spearman's correlation: 0.43-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of the MusiQoL appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring quality of life in Greek MS patients.

Keyword

epilepsy; quality of life; questionnaire; Greece

MeSH Terms

Checklist
Epilepsy
Greece
Humans
Multiple Sclerosis
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cited by  1 articles

Validity of Korean Versions of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life Questionnaire
So-Young Huh, Jungnam Joo, Su-Hyun Kim, Ae-Ran Joung, Kibyung Park, Woojun Kim, Min Su Park, Ho Jin Kim
J Clin Neurol. 2014;10(2):148-156.    doi: 10.3988/jcn.2014.10.2.148.


Reference

1. McCrone P, Heslin M, Knapp M, Bull P, Thompson A. Multiple sclerosis in the UK: service use, costs, quality of life and disability. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008. 26:847–860.
2. Miller DM, Kinkel RP. Health-related quality of life assessment in multiple sclerosis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008. 5:56–64.
Article
3. Motl RW, Snook EM. Physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Behav Med. 2008. 35:111–115.
Article
4. Whalley D, McKenna SP. Measuring quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995. 8:305–315.
Article
5. Solari A. Role of health-related quality of life measures in the routine care of people with multiple sclerosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005. 3:16.
Article
6. Simeoni M, Auquier P, Fernandez O, Flachenecker P, Stecchi S, Constantinescu C, et al. Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire. Mult Scler. 2008. 14:219–230.
Article
7. Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983. 13:227–231.
Article
8. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001. 50:121–127.
Article
9. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992. 30:473–483.
10. Tsivgoulis G, Triantafyllou N, Papageorgiou C, Evangelopoulos ME, Kararizou E, Sfagos C, et al. Associations of the Expanded Disability Status Scale with anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis outpatients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007. 115:67–72.
Article
11. Rentzos M, Cambouri C, Rombos A, Nikolaou C, Anagnostouli M, Tsoutsou A, et al. IL-15 is elevated in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2006. 241:25–29.
Article
12. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983. 33:1444–1452.
Article
13. Kurtzke JF. On the evaluation of disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1961. 11:686–694.
Article
14. Hauser SL, Dawson DM, Lehrich JR, Beal MF, Kevy SV, Propper RD, et al. Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. A randomized, three-arm study of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and ACTH. N Engl J Med. 1983. 308:173–180.
Article
15. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983. 40:812.
Article
16. Guy W. ECDEU Assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised. 1976. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;218–222.
17. Piperidou H, Terzoudi A, Vorvolakos T, Davis E, Heliopoulos I, Vadikolias K, et al. The Greek version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31). Qual Life Res. 2006. 15:833–839.
Article
18. Piperidou C, Karlovasitou A, Triantafyllou N, Dimitrakoudi E, Terzoudi A, Mavraki E, et al. Association of demographic, clinical and treatment variables with quality of life of patients with epilepsy in Greece. Qual Life Res. 2008. 17:987–996.
Article
19. Courts NF, Buchanan EM, Werstlein PO. Focus groups: the lived experience of participants with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2004. 36:42–47.
20. Somerset M, Peters TJ, Sharp DJ, Campbell R. Factors that contribute to quality of life outcomes prioritised by people with multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res. 2003. 12:21–29.
21. Kaul P, Lytle BL, Spertus JA, DeLong ER, Peterson ED. Influence of racial disparities in procedure use on functional status outcomes among patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2005. 111:1284–1290.
Article
22. Chavers LS, Gilbert GH, Shelton BJ. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in oral disadvantage, a measure of oral health-related quality of life: 24-month incidence. J Public Health Dent. 2002. 62:140–147.
Article
23. Cella DF, Dineen K, Arnason B, Reder A, Webster KA, Karabatsos G, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology. 1996. 47:129–139.
Article
24. Vickrey BG, Hays RD, Harooni R, Myers LW, Ellison GW. A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res. 1995. 4:187–206.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr