Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2011 Dec;15(6):437-443. 10.4196/kjpp.2011.15.6.437.

c-Fos Expression in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract in Response to Salt Stimulation in Rats

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea. bhlee@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
  • 3BK 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
  • 4Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
  • 5Functional Food Technology Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Sungnam 463-746, Korea.

Abstract

Salt signals in tongue are relayed to the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). This signaling is very important to determine whether to swallow salt-related nutrition or not and suggests some implications in discrimination of salt concentration. Salt concentration-dependent electrical responses in the chorda tympani and the NST were well reported. But salt concentration-dependency and spatial distribution of c-Fos in the NST were not well established. In the present study, NaCl signaling in the NST was studied in urethane-anesthetized rats. The c-Fos immunoreactivity in the six different NST areas along the rostral-caudal axis and six subregions in each of bilateral NST were compared between applications of distilled water and different concentrations of NaCl to the tongue of experimental animals. From this study, salt stimulation with high concentration (1.0 M NaCl) induced significantly higher c-Fos expression in intermediate NST and dorsal-medial and dorsal-middle subregions of the NST compared to distilled water stimulation. The result represents the specific spatial distribution of salt taste perception in the NST.

Keyword

c-Fos; Chorda tympani nerve; Nucleus of the solitary tract; Salt

MeSH Terms

Animals
Axis, Cervical Vertebra
Chorda Tympani Nerve
Discrimination (Psychology)
Rats
Solitary Nucleus
Taste Perception
Tongue
Water
Water

Figure

  • Fig. 1 FLI expression images and subregions of the NST. (A) Typical FLI coronal section along the rostral-caudal axis is compared. The arrow in the bottom indicates the direction of anterior-posterior axis. The middle image clearly shows that the left and right NST meet the 4th ventricles (4V). This section was designated as "0" to calculate other section's position along rostral-caudal axis and named i1 area (middle). The other sections were show typical r1 (left) and i3 (right) areas. (B) This image shows how the right NST was divided to six subregions. The horizontal line a lateral-medial axis divides the NST to dorsal and ventral regions. The two vertical lines equally divide the NST to medial, middle, and lateral regions. Scale bar: 1 mm in (A) and 500 µm in (B).

  • Fig. 2 Typical left NST images for r1, i1 and i3 areas of the NST from control (CNT) and NaCl-treated (0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 M) rats. The black dots in each NST are c-Fos expressed neurons. Scale bar: 250 µm.

  • Fig. 3 The number of FLI cells in the NST. (A) Left NST, (B) right NST. The position along the rostral-caudal axis is marked as r1, r2, i1, i2, i3, and i4. Here, i1 is position "0" section. The animal numbers are marked in parenthesis: Control (n=6), 0.1 M (n=5), 0.3 M (n=6), 0.6 M (n=6) and 1.0 M (n=4) NaCl. Error bars indicate SEM. *p<0.05.

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of FLI cell numbers in the subregions of the left NST. (A) dorsal-lateral, (B) dorsal-middle, (C) dorsal-medial, (D) ventral-lateral, (E) ventral-middle, (F) ventral-medial. The animal numbers are marked in parenthesis: Control (n=6), 0.1 M (n=5), 0.3 M (n=6), 0.6 M (n=6) and 1.0 M (n=4) NaCl. Error bars indicate SEM. *p<0.05.

  • Fig. 5 Comparison of FLI cell numbers in the each subregions in the right NST. (A) dorsal lateral, (B) dorsal middle, (C) dorsal medial, (D) ventral lateral, (E) ventral middle, (F) ventral medial. The animal numbers are marked in parenthesis; Control (n=6), 0.1 M (n=6), 0.3 M (n=5), 0.6 M (n=6) and 1.0 M (n=4) NaCl concentration. Error bar is SEM. *p<0.05.


Cited by  1 articles

Effects of Acupuncture Stimulation at Different Acupoints on Formalin-Induced Pain in Rats
Kyung Ha Chang, Sun Joon Bai, Hyejung Lee, Bae Hwan Lee
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;18(2):121-127.    doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.2.121.


Reference

1. Paxinos G. The Rat Nervous System. 2004. 3rd ed. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
2. Hamilton RB, Norgren R. Central projections of gustatory nerves in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1984; 222:560–577. PMID: 6199385.
Article
3. Morton GJ, Cummings DE, Baskin DG, Barsh GS, Schwartz MW. Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight. Nature. 2006; 443:289–295. PMID: 16988703.
Article
4. Herrera DG, Robertson HA. Activation of c-fos in the brain. Prog Neurobiol. 1996; 50:83–107. PMID: 8971979.
5. Chen JY, Victor JD, Di Lorenzo PM. Temporal coding of intensity of NaCl and HCl in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 105:697–711. PMID: 21106899.
Article
6. Carstens E, Sudo S, Jinks S, Simons C, Dressier JM, Carstens MI. Activation of neurons in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) by irritant chemical stimulation. Methods in Chemosensory Research. 2002. CRC Press.
Article
7. Chan CY, Yoo JE, Travers SP. Diverse bitter stimuli elicit highly similar patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the nucleus of the solitary tract. Chem Senses. 2004; 29:573–581. PMID: 15337683.
Article
8. Yamamoto T, Sawa K. c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in the brainstem following gastric loads of various chemical solutions in rats. Brain Res. 2000; 866:135–143. PMID: 10825489.
Article
9. Harrer MI, Travers SP. Topographic organization of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract evoked by gustatory stimulation with sucrose and quinine. Brain Res. 1996; 711:125–137. PMID: 8680855.
Article
10. Travers SP. Quinine and citric acid elicit distinctive Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat nucleus of the solitary tract. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002; 282:R1798–R1810. PMID: 12010763.
11. Contreras RJ. Cagan RH, editor. Gustatory mechanisms of a specific appetite. Neural mechanisms of taste. 1989. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press;p. 119–145.
Article
12. Lindemann B. Receptors and transduction in taste. Nature. 2001; 413:219–225. PMID: 11557991.
Article
13. Duncan CJ. Salt preferences of birds and mammals. Physiol Zoology. 1962; 35:120–132.
Article
14. Schafe GE, Fitts DA, Thiele TE, LeDoux JE, Bernstein IL. The induction of c-Fos in the NTS after taste aversion learning is not correlated with measures of conditioned fear. Behav Neurosci. 2000; 114:99–106. PMID: 10718265.
Article
15. Houpt TA, Smith GP, Joh TH, Frankmann SP. c-fos-like immunoreactivity in the subfornical organ and nucleus of the solitary tract following salt intake by sodium-depleted rats. Physiol Behav. 1998; 63:505–510. PMID: 9523891.
Article
16. Grancha ML, Navarro M, Cubero I, Thiele TE, Bernstein IL. Induction of a brainstem correlate of conditioned taste aversion expression: role of the pontine parabrachial nucleus. Behav Brain Res. 2002; 131:205–209. PMID: 11844587.
Article
17. Travers SP, Hu H. Extranuclear projections of rNST neurons expressing gustatory-elicited Fos. J Comp Neurol. 2000; 427:124–138. PMID: 11042595.
Article
18. Stratford JM, Finger TE. Central representation of postingestive chemosensory cues in mice that lack the ability to taste. J Neurosci. 2011; 31:9101–9110. PMID: 21697361.
Article
19. King CT, Garcea M, Spector AC. Glossopharyngeal nerve regeneration is essential for the complete recovery of quinine-stimulated oromotor rejection behaviors and central patterns of neuronal activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat. J Neurosci. 2000; 20:8426–8434. PMID: 11069950.
Article
20. Scott TR, Giza BK. Coding channels in the taste system of the rat. Science. 1990; 249:1585–1587. PMID: 2171145.
Article
21. Corson SL, Hill DL. Chorda tympani nerve terminal field maturation and maintenance is severely altered following changes to gustatory nerve input to the nucleus of the solitary tract. J Neurosci. 2011; 31:7591–7603. PMID: 21613473.
Article
22. Takayama K, Suzuki T, Miura M. The comparison of effects of various anesthetics on expression of Fos protein in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett. 1994; 176:59–62. PMID: 7970238.
Article
23. Rosen AM, Roussin AT, Di Lorenzo PM. Water as an independent taste modality. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4:175. PMID: 21048894.
Article
24. Voorhies AC, Bernstein IL. Induction and expression of salt appetite: effects on Fos expression in nucleus accumbens. Behav Brain Res. 2006; 172:90–96. PMID: 16712968.
Article
25. Navarro M, Spray KJ, Cubero I, Thiele TE, Bernstein IL. cFos induction during conditioned taste aversion expression varies with aversion strength. Brain Res. 2000; 887:450–453. PMID: 11134640.
Article
26. Houpt TA, Philopena JM, Wessel TC, Joh TH, Smith GP. Increased c-fos expression in nucleus of the solitary tract correlated with conditioned taste aversion to sucrose in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1994; 172:1–5. PMID: 8084508.
Article
27. Chen X, Gabitto M, Peng Y, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS. A gustotopic map of taste qualities in the mammalian brain. Science. 2011; 333:1262–1266. PMID: 21885776.
Article
28. Accolla R, Bathellier B, Petersen CC, Carleton A. Differential spatial representation of taste modalities in the rat gustatory cortex. J Neurosci. 2007; 27:1396–1404. PMID: 17287514.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr