Infect Chemother.  2011 Oct;43(5):396-405. 10.3947/ic.2011.43.5.396.

Application of Infrequent-Restriction-Site Polymerase Reaction (IRS-PCR) to the Molecular Epidemiologic Analysis of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Biomedical Science, The Catholic University of Korea, Graduate School, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. jhyoo@catholic.ac.kr
  • 3Catholic Research Institutes of Medical Science, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
We investigated the usefulness of infrequent-restriction-site polymerase chain reaction (IRS-PCR) compared with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on the molecular epidemiologic analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We used fifty clinical isolates of MRSA collected from 10 university hospitals located in Seoul. We performed three procedures on these isolates: PFGE using SmaI, IRS-PCR using XbaI-Hha I or EagI-Hha I, and MLST using seven house-keeping genes. We determined the clusters of molecular types by dendrogram using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and Dice coefficients.
RESULTS
MLST analysis showed that isolates exhibited ST1, ST5, ST72, ST89, and ST239. In PFGE, the isolates clustered into 5 major groups with 80% similarity, which subsequently became classified into 18 subgroups with 95% similarity. In IRS-PCR using EagI-HhaI restriction enzymes, there was little resolution among the patterns of isolates. However, XbaI-HhaI IRS-PCR showed 5 groups with a 90% similarity. These groups were then classified into 9 subgroups with a 95% similarity. There were no significant differences among the isolates from different hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS
The XbaI-HhaI IRS-PCR method could be a useful tool in the molecular epidemiology of MRSA. Its resolution power was good enough to analyze isolates, because the patterns of IRS-PCR were closely correlated with those of MLST and showed diverse groups.

Keyword

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis; Infrequent restriction site PCR; Multilocus sequence typing

MeSH Terms

Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
Genes, Essential
Hospitals, University
Methicillin
Methicillin Resistance
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Molecular Epidemiology
Multilocus Sequence Typing
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Staphylococcus
Staphylococcus aureus
Methicillin

Figure

  • Figure 1 Schematic presentation of IRS-PCR.

  • Figure 2 IRS-PCR electrophoretic patterns of MRSA produced by amplification of restricted-ligated XbaI-HhaI fragments. (A) Lane 1 and 10 contained 25-bp ladders; lane 2 through 9 contained clinically isolated strains using adaptor (AH1&AH2, AX1 & AX2, AE1 & AE2) and primer PX-C. (B) Lane 1, 8, and 15 contained 25-bp ladders; lane 2 through 7 and 9 through 14 contained clinically-isolated strains using new adaptor (AH1 & AH2-new, AX1 & AX2-new, AE1 & AE2-new) and primer PX-C. (C) Lane 1 and 10 contained 25-bp ladders; lane 2 through 9 contained clinically-isolated strains using new adaptor (AH1 & AH2-new, AX1 & AX2-new, AE1 & AE2-new) and primer PX-CG.

  • Figure 3 Representative products of PFGE. Lane 1, 7, 13, and 20 contained DNA marker (NCTC8325 S. aureus); lane 2 through 6, 8 through 12, and 14 through 19 contained clinically-isolated strains.

  • Figure 4 IRS-PCR electrophoretic patterns of MRSA produced by amplification of restricted-ligated XbaI-HhaI DNA using primer PX-CG in MRSA. The lane 1 in each gel contained 25-bp ladders; (A) ST239 isolates. (B) lane 2 to 5 contained ST89 isolates; lanes 6 to 9 contained ST72 isolates. (C) ST1 isolates. (D) ST5 isolates.

  • Figure 5 Dendrogram of MRSA in PFGE.

  • Figure 6 Dendrogram of MRSA in IRS-PCR.


Reference

1. Williams REO, Jevons MP, Shoote RA, Thom BT, Noble WC, Lidwell OM, White RG, Taylor GW. Isolation for the control of staphylococcal infection in surgical wards. Br Med J. 1962. 2:275–282.
Article
2. Saravolatz LD, Markowitz N, Arking L, Pohlod D, Fisher E. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Epidemiologic observation during a community-acquired outbreak. Ann Intern Med. 1982. 96:11–16.
3. Klein E, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R. Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999-2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007. 13:1840–1846.
Article
4. Hussain FM, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in healthy children attending an outpatient pediatric clinic. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001. 20:763–767.
5. Suggs AH, Maranan MC, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. Methicillin-resistant and borderline methicillin-resistant asymptomatic Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children without identifiable risk factors. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999. 18:410–414.
Article
6. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS, Tang AW, Phung TO, Spellberg B. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005. 352:1445–1453.
Article
7. Chong Y, Lee K. Present situation of antimicrobial resistance in Korea. J Infect Chemother. 2000. 6:189–195.
Article
8. Kim JM, Park ES, Jeong JS, Kim KM, Kim JM, Oh HS, Yoon SW, Chang HS, Chang KH, Lee SI, Lee MS, Song JH, Kang MW, Park SC, Choe KW, Pai CH. Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Committee of the Korean Society for Nosocomial Infection Control. Multicenter surveillance study for nosocomial infections in major hospitals in Korea. Am J Infect Control. 2000. 28:454–458.
Article
9. Kim HB, Sa CM, Yoo J, Kim BS, Yun OJ, Yoon HR, Lee YS. Antibiotic resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the patients admitted to non-teriary hospitals. Korean J Infect Dis. 2000. 32:259–263.
10. Kim SM, Lee DC, Park SD, Kim BS, Kim JK, Choi MR, Park SY, Hwang SM, Shin NY, Shim ES, Kwon PS, Kwon DY, Hur SH, Kim HJ, Lim HB, Chong Y. Genotype, coagulase type and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dermatology patients and healthy individuals in Korea. J Bacteriol Virol. 2009. 39:307–316.
Article
11. McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:5113–5120.
Article
12. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. 38:1008–1015.
Article
13. Mazurek GH, Reddy V, Maston BJ, Haas WH, Crawford JT. DNA fingerprinting by infrequent-restriction-site amplification. J Clin Microbiol. 1996. 34:2386–2390.
Article
14. Lally RT, Ederer MN, Woolfrey BF. Evaluation of mannitol salt agar with oxacillin as a screening medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1985. 22:501–504.
Article
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI document M100-S19. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing nineteenth informational supplement. 2009. Wayne PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
16. Schwartz DC, Cantor CR. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 1984. 37:67–75.
Article
17. Murchan S, Kaufmann ME, Deplano A, deRyck R, Struelens M, Zinn CE, Fussing V, Salmenlinna S, Vuopio-Varkila J, El Solh N, Cuny C, Witte W, Tassios PT, Legakis N, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Vindel A, Laconcha I, Garaizar J, Haeggman S, Olsson-Liljequist B, Ransjo U, Coombes G, Cookson B. Harmonization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for epidemiological typing of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a single approach developed by consensus in 10 European laboratories and its application for tracing the spread of related strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2003. 41:1574–1585.
Article
18. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995. 33:2233–2239.
Article
19. Cha HY, Moon DC, Choi CH, Oh JY, Jeong YS, Lee YC, Seol SY, Cho DT, Chang HH, Kim SW, Lee JC. Prevalence of the ST239 clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and differences in antimicrobial susceptibilities of ST239 and ST5 clones identified in a Korean hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. 43:3610–3614.
Article
20. Handley SA, Regnery RL. Differentiation of pathogenic Bartonella species by infrequent.restriction-site PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000. 38:3010–3015.
Article
21. Dyer DW, Iandolo JJ. Rapid isolation of DNA from Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983. 46:283–295.
22. Riffard S, Lo Presti F, Vandenesch F, Forey F, Reyrolle M, Etienne J. Comparative analysis of infrequent-restriction-site PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for epidemiological typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1998. 36:161–167.
Article
23. Kim SI, Yoo JH, Cho YK, Lee DG, Wie SH, Choi JH, Kim YR, Shin WS, Kang MW. Comparison of Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism, and Infrequent Restriction Site-Polymerase Chain Reaction for Molecular Typing of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Strains. Korean J Infect Dis. 1999. 31:474–480.
24. Yoo JH, Choi JH, Shin WS, Huh DH, Cho YK, Kim KM, Kim MY, Kang MW. Application of infrequent-restriction-site PCR to clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Serratia marcescens. J Clin Microbiol. 1999. 37:3108–3112.
Article
25. Peacock SJ, de Silva I, Lowy FD. What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? Trends Microbiol. 2001. 9:605–610.
26. Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, Harriman K, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Farley MM. Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Program of the Emerging Infections Program Network. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med. 2005. 352:1436–1444.
Article
27. Hisata K, Kuwahara-Arai K, Yamanoto M, Ito T, Nakatomi Y, Cui L, Baba T, Terasawa M, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Yamashiro Y, Hiramatsu K. Dissemination of methicillin-resistant staphylococci among healthy Japanese children. J Clin Microbiol. 2005. 43:3364–3372.
Article
28. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988. 16:128–140.
Article
29. Lee WG. Resistance mechanism and epidermiology of vancomycin resistant enterococci. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2008. 11:71–77.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr